CHRISTCHURCH, New Zealand — Brenton Tarrant, the man accused of killing dozens of worshipers at two New Zealand mosques, reversed his earlier not-guilty plea and was convicted Thursday on all charges stemming from the country’s worst peacetime atrocity.
Tarrant used a range of weapons to carry out the massacre in Christchurch on March 15 last year, leaving 51 dead and dozens more injured. The first of the attacks was live-streamed on the Internet. The Australian national was charged with the highest number of murder counts ever brought against an individual in New Zealand, to which a terrorism offense was added along with 40 counts of attempted murder.
The reasons behind the gunman’s surprise move to switch his plea to guilty remain unclear; he had previously denied culpability, and a trial had been scheduled to begin in June. The news broke as New Zealand began a nationwide lockdown to curb the spread of the novel coronavirus.
Appearing in Christchurch High Court on Thursday by video link from an Auckland prison, Tarrant appeared gaunt and emotionless as he listened to the court registrar read out the charges and the names of the dead. Two senior members of Christchurch’s Muslim community were present, although victims’ families and other survivors did not attend.
Tarrant, who could face life in prison, was remanded into custody by presiding judge Justice Cameron Mander until May 1, by which time a date for the sentencing would be set. Lawyers for the 29-year-old, now New Zealand’s first convicted terrorist, did not respond to a request for comment.
[A year after New Zealand mosque shootings, secrecy shrouds search for answers]
The mosque attacks prompted New Zealand’s government to ban assault weapons, implement a buyback of existing firearms and ramp up surveillance. The massacre also fueled questions about whether intelligence and security agencies had been sufficiently rigorous in monitoring far-right or white-supremacist networks.
Jamal Green, spokesman for Al Noor Mosque, which was targeted in the attacks, said he did not know in advance about Tarrant’s sudden decision to plead guilty. The reaction from the community was “one of relief and great surprise; tears of joy, even,” he said.
“It should be acknowledged, however, that there will be a mix of emotions,” he added. “This is no easy joy or satisfaction. Every community that has been a victim of hate and loss will recognize a kind of emptiness when their world has suffered in this way.”
Vincent Thian
AP
Mourners lay flowers on a wall at the Botanical Gardens in Christchurch, New Zealand, on March 16, 2019.
Graeme Edgeler, a Wellington-based lawyer and legal commentator, noted that a guilty plea, however belated, might open the possibility of a sentence with parole.
“In New Zealand, a person pleading guilty is usually entitled to a reduction in their sentence for the guilty plea, so there may be a hope that a guilty plea will mean there will only be a life sentence with a very long nonparole period, instead of a sentence of life without parole,” he said.
The offense is so serious “that even with a guilty plea, a life-without-parole sentence must still be likely,” Edgeler added.
Police said arrangements for Thursday’s hearing were made hastily after Tarrant indicated through his lawyer on Tuesday that he wished to be brought before the court. “Police appreciate this news will come as a surprise to the victims and the public, some of whom may have wished to be present in the courtroom,” they said in a statement.
[After mosque shootings, New Zealand’s weapons buyback runs into an obstacle: Gun owners]
Omar Nabi, whose father, Haji Daoud Nabi, died in the attacks, said he felt relief on hearing the news but added that “to be there, to see it unfold would have been a lot better” than finding out through the media. Still, he understood that this would not have been possible due to the pandemic lockdown. He said he plans to attend the sentencing.
Anjum Rahman, a spokeswoman for New Zealand’s Islamic Women’s Council, said that while the guilty plea did not deliver closure, “the main thing is that we do not have to sit through a whole court case and hear a defense of atrocious acts.”
New Zealand has been conducting an official inquiry into the massacre, with agencies such as police and intelligence services questioned about the circumstances leading to the atrocity. But much evidence had been subject to suppression orders to avoid jeopardizing Tarrant’s right to a fair trial.
With Tarrant’s guilty plea, Rahman called Thursday for the inquiry evidence to be made public.
“Now that there isn’t a [trial], there isn’t a reason to suppress any evidence,” Rahman said.
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said the guilty plea would “provide some relief to the many people whose lives were shattered by what happened on March 15.”
Read more
A year after New Zealand mosque shootings, secrecy shrouds search for answers
After mosque shootings, New Zealand’s weapons buyback runs into an obstacle: gun owners
Among New Zealand mosque attack victims: Parents, children, refugees
Today’s coverage from Post correspondents around the world
Like Washington Post World on Facebook and stay updated on foreign news
https://news.google.com/__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_b3V0cHV0VHlwZT1hbXA?oc=5
2020-03-26 12:52:46Z
52780689178410
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar