Jumat, 29 Mei 2020

White House dares Twitter in war over Trump tweets - Yahoo Singapore News

View photos
US President Donald Trump (pictured May 28, 2020) has more than 80 million followers and uses tweets daily to announce policies, attack opponents and comment on breaking news

The White House thumbed its nose at Twitter on Friday by reposting a President Donald Trump tweet that the social media giant had just taken the unprecedented step of hiding, because it violated the platform's rules against "glorifying violence."

The tit-for-tat marked a new escalation in the row between Twitter and Trump, who has more than 80 million followers and uses tweets daily to announce policies, attack opponents and comment on breaking news.

Twitter concluded that Trump fell afoul of its policies with a late-night tweet on violent anti-police protests in Minneapolis, when he called protesters "THUGS" and warned of military intervention.

"When the looting starts, the shooting starts," Trump tweeted.

Twitter said his words were "glorifying violence" and hid the post, although readers could still click through to get access.

In response, the official White House account called Twitter's bluff by retweeting the same post. This time, Twitter responded by saying that while it violated its rules, the company "determined that it may be in the public's interest for the Tweet to remain accessible."

The White House later defended Trump's tweet, saying, "The President did not glorify violence. He clearly condemned it."

And Trump's social media director and Twitter feed manager, Dan Scavino, had his own response.

"Twitter is full of shit -- more and more people are beginning to get it," he wrote on Twitter.

The latest spat came a day after Trump signed an executive order in the Oval Office seeking to transform the way social media companies are regulated. That followed Trump's fury over Twitter tagging two of his tweets with fact checks, which was also an unprecedented measure.

Trump claims that the platform, where he dwarfs the presence of his Democratic rival Joe Biden for the November presidential election, is biased against him.

One immediate result of the blow-up between the social media-savvy president and the high-profile company has been to knock the coronavirus pandemic and recently reached toll of 100,000 dead Americans out of the headlines.

It also ties in with one of Trump's major reelection themes: that despite being a billionaire White House incumbent with a Republican majority in the Senate, he is an outsider fighting a left-wing establishment.

- End to self-regulation? -

Trump's executive order seeks to remove social media platforms' decades-long freedom from liability for content posted. Instead of being allowed to self-regulate, this would treat the companies more like traditional publishers, open to government regulation and court challenges over false or harmful material.

Trump told reporters at the White House he acted because big tech firms "have had unchecked power to censor, restrict, edit, shape, hide, alter any form of communication between private citizens or large public audiences."

"We can't let this continue to happen," Trump said.

Ironically, his order could spur companies like Twitter to impose stricter lines for users, eventually curbing social media firebrands like Trump himself, who regularly goes online to insult people and support conspiracy theories.

How much will change in the near term is unclear, given the legal and political challenges facing Trump's move.

Critics say Trump has no authority to regulate private internet operators or change the law, known as Section 230, which backers say has allowed online platforms like Facebook and Twitter to flourish.

The American Civil Liberties Union called Trump's order "a blatant and unconstitutional threat to punish social media companies that displease the president."

Eric Goldman, director of the High-Tech Law Institute at Santa Clara University, said the order was "more about political theater than about changing the law."

The order "is not legally supportable -- it flies in the face of more than 900 court decisions," Goldman said.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiUmh0dHBzOi8vc2cubmV3cy55YWhvby5jb20vdHJ1bXAtdGFyZ2V0LXNvY2lhbC1tZWRpYS1leGVjdXRpdmUtb3JkZXItMTUyMzQxMzg0Lmh0bWzSAVpodHRwczovL3NnLm5ld3MueWFob28uY29tL2FtcGh0bWwvdHJ1bXAtdGFyZ2V0LXNvY2lhbC1tZWRpYS1leGVjdXRpdmUtb3JkZXItMTUyMzQxMzg0Lmh0bWw?oc=5

2020-05-29 14:53:00Z
52780798738150

China sanctions not solution to Hong Kong crisis: European Union - CNA

BRUSSELS: The European Union said on Friday (May 29) that China's imposition of a security law on Hong Kong had damaged ties with Beijing, but that imposing sanctions would not solve the crisis.

"The EU expresses its grave concern at the steps taken by China on May 28, which are not in conformity with its international commitments," EU top diplomat Josep Borrell said, on behalf of 27 member states.

"EU relations with China are based on mutual respect and trust. This decision further calls into question China's will to uphold its international commitments," he said, after talks with foreign ministers.

Asked whether Brussels might threaten sanctions after the new law was approved, Borrell said: "I don't think that sanctions are the way to solve problems in China."

READ: Hong Kong government warns removing US special status is 'double-edged sword'

Borrell said that only one of the member states - he did not say which - had raised the issue of possible sanctions, and added that plans to hold an EU-China summit in Germany later this year were not in question.

China's President Xi Jinping is due to meet the EU's 27 leaders in Leipzig in September. Borrell said the timetable of the meeting might yet change due to the coronavirus pandemic.

The cautious EU statement came after the US, Britain, Canada and Australia issued stern criticism of the planned law, which would punish secession and subversion of state power in Hong Kong.

Chinese security agencies will also be allowed to operate openly in Hong Kong, which has been an autonomous territory under its own basic law within China under the terms of its handover from Britain in 1997.

British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said the UK will improve the rights of British National (Overseas) passport holders - a status offered to many Hong Kong residents - if China goes ahead.

And the United States has revoked the special status conferred on Hong Kong under its own diplomatic rules, paving the way for the territory to be stripped of trading and economic privileges.

READ: China faces mounting pressure over Hong Kong security law

Brussels did not go so far, but Borrell nevertheless stressed that it could not be business as usual.

"We want also to stress that our relationship with China are based on mutual respect and trust ... but this decision calls this into question," Borrell said.

"And I think that we will have to raise the issue in our continued dialogue with China."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiaWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNoYW5uZWxuZXdzYXNpYS5jb20vbmV3cy93b3JsZC9ob25nLWtvbmctY2hpbmEtZXVyb3BlYW4tdW5pb24tc2FuY3Rpb25zLW5vdC1zb2x1dGlvbi0xMjc4NDc4MtIBAA?oc=5

2020-05-29 13:41:03Z
52780800526630

China braces for global fallout over Hong Kong national security law - South China Morning Post

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

China braces for global fallout over Hong Kong national security law  South China Morning PostView Full coverage on Google News
https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMidGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnNjbXAuY29tL25ld3MvY2hpbmEvZGlwbG9tYWN5L2FydGljbGUvMzA4NjczNS9jaGluYS1icmFjZXMtaW50ZXJuYXRpb25hbC1mYWxsb3V0LW92ZXItaG9uZy1rb25nLW5hdGlvbmFs0gF0aHR0cHM6Ly9hbXAuc2NtcC5jb20vbmV3cy9jaGluYS9kaXBsb21hY3kvYXJ0aWNsZS8zMDg2NzM1L2NoaW5hLWJyYWNlcy1pbnRlcm5hdGlvbmFsLWZhbGxvdXQtb3Zlci1ob25nLWtvbmctbmF0aW9uYWw?oc=5

2020-05-29 13:00:17Z
CBMidGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnNjbXAuY29tL25ld3MvY2hpbmEvZGlwbG9tYWN5L2FydGljbGUvMzA4NjczNS9jaGluYS1icmFjZXMtaW50ZXJuYXRpb25hbC1mYWxsb3V0LW92ZXItaG9uZy1rb25nLW5hdGlvbmFs0gF0aHR0cHM6Ly9hbXAuc2NtcC5jb20vbmV3cy9jaGluYS9kaXBsb21hY3kvYXJ0aWNsZS8zMDg2NzM1L2NoaW5hLWJyYWNlcy1pbnRlcm5hdGlvbmFsLWZhbGxvdXQtb3Zlci1ob25nLWtvbmctbmF0aW9uYWw

Twitter hides Donald Trump tweet about Minneapolis protests for 'glorifying violence' - CNA

WASHINGTON: Twitter hid a tweet from President Donald Trump on Friday (May 29), accusing him of breaking its rules by "glorifying violence" in a message that said looters at protests in Minneapolis would be shot.

Twitter's decision to step in, at a time of racially charged civil unrest in cities across the United States, escalates a feud between Trump and tech companies.

It came just hours after Trump signed an executive order threatening Silicon Valley social media firms with new regulations over free speech.

"...These THUGS are dishonoring the memory of George Floyd, and I won’t let that happen. Just spoke to Governor Tim Walz and told him that the Military is with him all the way. Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts. Thank you!" Trump's tweet read.

Trump's message can now be seen only after clicking on a notice which says: "This Tweet violated the Twitter Rules about glorifying violence. However, Twitter has determined that it may be in the public’s interest for the Tweet to remain accessible."

READ: Minnesota calls in National Guard to quell unrest over black man's death in police custody

Trump responded with another tweet about six hours later, saying: "Section 230 should be revoked by Congress. Until then, it will be regulated."

The US president said that he would introduce legislation that may scrap or weaken Section 230.

He signed an executive order on Thursday afternoon directing federal agencies to clarify the scope of Section 230, which protects Internet companies from liability for illegal content posted by users and allows them to remove lawful but objectionable posts.

Trump had attacked Twitter for tagging tweets of his this week about unsubstantiated claims of fraud in mail-in voting. Twitter added a warning prompting readers to fact-check the posts.

READ: Angry US protests, looting over police killing of black man in Minneapolis

A Twitter spokeswoman said CEO Jack Dorsey had been informed of the decision to tag Trump's tweet before the label was applied.

Trump issued his tweet after days of unrest in Minneapolis, where peaceful rallies gave way to a third night of arson, looting and vandalism as protesters vented their rage over the death of Floyd, a black man seen on video gasping for breath while a white police officer knelt on his neck.

Trump has condemned the killing of Floyd and promised justice.

People look on from a distance after protesters set fire to a liquor store as demonstrations contin
People look on from a distance after protesters set fire to a liquor store as demonstrations continue in Minneapolis. (Photo: Reuters)

Four police officers involved in Floyd's death have been fired and the FBI is investigating.

The incident was one of several killings of black people in the United States in recent months that has provoked outrage. The Minneapolis night sky was lit up with flame from a police precinct that had been torched overnight.

Sympathy protests also took place in other US cities. In Louisville, Kentucky, police said seven people were shot and at least one was in critical condition.

Protesters there vented rage over another police killing, of Breonna Taylor, a black woman fatally shot during a raid in her apartment in March. Louisville's mayor has asked the FBI to review a police investigation into her death.

READ: Trump signs order targeting social media after tweets flagged

'PREVENTING VIOLENCE'

In a thread, Twitter said it had taken its action over the Trump tweet "in the interest of preventing others from being inspired to commit violent acts".

People will still "be able to retweet with comment, but will not be able to like, reply or retweet it".

Twitter's decision to intervene in Trump's messages is a contrast with Facebook, whose CEO Mark Zuckerberg told Fox News in an interview earlier this week: "I just believe strongly that Facebook shouldn't be the arbiter of truth of everything that people say online."

The death of Floyd has reignited protests that have flared up repeatedly in recent years over killings of black people. In the video circulated this week, Floyd can be heard gasping "I can't breathe" while an officer knelt on his neck, a phrase also spoken by Eric Garner, whose death while held in a police chokehold in New York in 2014 prompted nationwide outrage.

Demonstrators say the authorities have responded harshly to protests by African Americans, comparing that to the peaceful response to protests by mostly white, sometimes armed Trump supporters in recent weeks, calling for the lifting of lockdowns meant to halt the spread of the coronavirus.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMicWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNoYW5uZWxuZXdzYXNpYS5jb20vbmV3cy93b3JsZC90d2l0dGVyLWRvbmFsZC10cnVtcC1kaXNjbGFpbWVyLW1pbm5lYXBvbGlzLXByb3Rlc3RzLXZpb2xlbmNlLTEyNzgzNTkw0gEA?oc=5

2020-05-29 11:58:54Z
52780798738150

Twitter hides Trump tweet for 'glorifying violence' - CNA

REUTERS: Twitter hid a tweet from President Donald Trump on Friday, accusing him of breaking its rules by "glorifying violence" in a message that said looters at protests in Minneapolis would be shot.

Twitter's decision to step in, at a time of racially charged civil unrest in cities across the United States, escalates a feud between Trump and tech companies.

It came just hours after Trump signed an executive order threatening Silicon Valley social media firms with new regulations over free speech.

"...These THUGS are dishonoring the memory of George Floyd, and I won’t let that happen. Just spoke to Governor Tim Walz and told him that the Military is with him all the way. Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts. Thank you!" Trump's tweet read.

Trump's message can now be seen only after clicking on a notice which says: "This Tweet violated the Twitter Rules about glorifying violence. However, Twitter has determined that it may be in the public’s interest for the Tweet to remain accessible."

A Twitter spokeswoman said CEO Jack Dorsey had been informed of the decision to tag Trump's tweet before the label was applied.

Trump issued his tweet after days of unrest in Minneapolis, where peaceful rallies gave way to a third night of arson, looting and vandalism as protesters vented their rage over the death of Floyd, a black man seen on video gasping for breath while a white police officer knelt on his neck.

Trump has condemned the killing of Floyd and promised justice.

Four police officers involved in Floyd's death have been fired and the FBI is investigating.

The incident was one of several killings of black people in the United States in recent months that has provoked outrage. The Minneapolis night sky was lit up with flame from a police precinct that had been torched overnight.

Sympathy protests also took place in other U.S. cities. In Louisville, Kentucky, police said seven people were shot and at least one was in critical condition.

Protesters there vented rage over another police killing, of Breonna Taylor, a black woman fatally shot during a raid in her apartment in March. Louisville's mayor has asked the FBI to review a police investigation into her death.

'PREVENTING VIOLENCE'

In a thread, Twitter said it had taken its action over the Trump tweet "in the interest of preventing others from being inspired to commit violent acts".

People will still "be able to retweet with comment, but will not be able to like, reply or retweet it".

Twitter's action came after Trump said he would introduce legislation that may scrap or weaken a law that has protected internet companies, including Twitter and Facebook.

The proposed legislation is part of an executive order Trump signed on Thursday afternoon. Trump had attacked Twitter for tagging tweets of his this week about unsubstantiated claims of fraud in mail-in voting. Twitter added a warning prompting readers to fact-check the posts.

Twitter's decision to intervene in Trump's messages is a contrast with Facebook, whose CEO Mark Zuckerberg told Fox News in an interview earlier this week: "I just believe strongly that Facebook shouldn't be the arbiter of truth of everything that people say online."

The death of Floyd has reignited protests that have flared up repeatedly in recent years over killings of black people. In the video circulated this week, Floyd can be heard gasping "I can't breathe" while an officer knelt on his neck, a phrase also spoken by Eric Garner, whose death while held in a police chokehold in New York in 2014 prompted nationwide outrage.

Demonstrators say the authorities have responded harshly to protests by African Americans, comparing that to the peaceful response to protests by mostly white, sometimes armed Trump supporters in recent weeks, calling for the lifting of lockdowns meant to halt the spread of the coronavirus.

(Reporting by Shubham Kalia and Subrat Patnaik in Bengaluru; Additional reporting by Josephine Mason; Writing by Peter Graff; Editing by Jon Boyle)

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMidGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNoYW5uZWxuZXdzYXNpYS5jb20vbmV3cy9idXNpbmVzcy90d2l0dGVyLWRvbmFsZC10cnVtcC1kaXNjbGFpbWVyLW1pbm5lYXBvbGlzLXByb3Rlc3RzLXZpb2xlbmNlLTEyNzgzNTkw0gEA?oc=5

2020-05-29 10:18:45Z
52780798738150

China faces mounting pressure over Hong Kong security law - CNA

BEIJING: China faced growing international pressure on Friday (May 29) over its move to impose a security law on Hong Kong that critics say will destroy the city's autonomy, with the United States and Britain placing the issue before the UN Security Council.

The US, Britain, Canada and Australia led criticism of the planned law, which would punish secession, subversion of state power, terrorism and acts that endanger national security, as well as allow Chinese security agencies to operate openly in Hong Kong.

China's parliament on Thursday approved the plans for the law, which followed seven months of huge and sometimes violent protests in Hong Kong last year.

China's rubber-stamp parliament voted nearly unanimously to approve plans to impose the
China's parliament voted nearly unanimously to approve plans to impose the security law on Hong Kong. (Photo: AFP/Nicolas Asfouri)

After China fended off initial American efforts this week to have the controversy put on the agenda of the United Nations Security Council, the US and Britain succeeded in securing an informal discussion about it for Friday, diplomatic sources told AFP.

Beijing's proposed security law "lies in direct conflict" with China's international obligations to guarantee certain freedoms in Hong Kong, the two countries said in a joint statement with Canada and Australia on Thursday.

"The proposed law would undermine the One Country, Two Systems framework," they added, referring to Hong Kong's special status within China under the terms of its handover from Britain in 1997.

British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab also said the UK would widen its rules around the rights of British National (Overseas) passport holders - a status offered to many Hongkongers at the time of handover - if China went ahead with the new law.

READ: Britain deeply concerned by China's security law for Hong Kong - PM Johnson's spokesman

The Chinese parliament's vote came just hours after Washington revoked the special status conferred on Hong Kong, paving the way for the territory to be stripped of trading and economic privileges.

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the status had been withdrawn because China was no longer honouring its handover agreement with Britain to allow Hong Kong a high level of autonomy.

READ: Hong Kong loses US 'special status' - what next?

US President Donald Trump also announced he would hold a press conference on Friday about China, with Hong Kong and a series of other flashpoint issues - including the coronavirus, espionage and trade -almost certain to be brought up.

"We'll be announcing tomorrow what we're doing with respect to China," Trump told reporters on Thursday.

"We're not happy with China."

"SAFE ENVIRONMENT"

China has remained defiant in the face of Western criticism on Hong Kong, insisting "foreign forces" are to blame for fuelling the protest movement and creating turmoil in the city of 7.5 million people.

Li Zhanshu - chairman of the NPC Standing Committee which will now draft the law - said on Thursday the move was "in line with the fundamental interests of all Chinese people, including Hong Kong compatriots".

Under the "one country, two systems" model agreed before the city's return from Britain to China, Hong Kong is supposed to be guaranteed certain liberties until 2047 that are denied to those on the mainland.

The mini-constitution that has governed Hong Kong's affairs since the handover obliges the territory's authorities to enact national security laws.

But huge protests blocked an effort to do so in 2003, and Hong Kong's government then shelved it while watching the protest movement grow.

Riot police in Hong Kong have arrested hundreds of people in recent days to ensure there are no
Riot police in Hong Kong have arrested hundreds of people in recent days. (Photo: AFP/Anthony Wallace)

China's state-run media on Friday said the law was in the interests of protecting peace and autonomy in Hong Kong.

"For (Hong Kong residents), safeguarding national security is a must, rather than a choice," the official news agency Xinhua in a commentary.

The People's Daily said in an editorial that law would only target "a small minority of people who are suspected of committing crimes that endanger national security".

But rather than diminishing the rights of Hong Kong residents, including freedom of speech, the law will "further safeguard those legal rights and freedoms in a safe environment," the paper said.

In Hong Kong, the protest movement voiced the opposite sentiments.

Pro-democracy campagers in Hong Kong say China's planned security law will destroy the
Protesters in Hong Kong say China's planned security law will destroy the city's cherished autonomy. (Photo: AFP/Anthony Wallace)
​​​​​​​

"It's the end of Hong Kong," pro-democracy lawmaker Claudia Mo told AFP.

"They are cutting off our souls, taking away the values which we've always embraced, values like human rights, democracy, rule of law."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiYWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNoYW5uZWxuZXdzYXNpYS5jb20vbmV3cy9hc2lhL2NoaW5hLW1vdW50aW5nLXByZXNzdXJlLWhvbmcta29uZy1zZWN1cml0eS1sYXctMTI3ODI5MjbSAQA?oc=5

2020-05-29 06:19:08Z
52780800526630

EU not in mood to follow Trump into China conflict over Hong Kong law - South China Morning Post

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. EU not in mood to follow Trump into China conflict over Hong Kong law  South China Morning Post
  2. Hong Kong government warns removing US special status is 'double-edged sword'  CNA
  3. Asia stocks slip as markets await Trump's response to China  The Straits Times
  4. China can’t crush Hong Kong’s freedom and still profit from it  The Washington Post
  5. Will President Trump Stand With Hong Kong?  The New York Times
  6. View Full coverage on Google News

https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMieGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnNjbXAuY29tL2Vjb25vbXkvY2hpbmEtZWNvbm9teS9hcnRpY2xlLzMwODY2MjAvZXUtbm90LW1vb2QtZm9sbG93LWRvbmFsZC10cnVtcC1jaGluYS1jb25mbGljdC1vdmVyLWhvbmcta29uZ9IBeGh0dHBzOi8vYW1wLnNjbXAuY29tL2Vjb25vbXkvY2hpbmEtZWNvbm9teS9hcnRpY2xlLzMwODY2MjAvZXUtbm90LW1vb2QtZm9sbG93LWRvbmFsZC10cnVtcC1jaGluYS1jb25mbGljdC1vdmVyLWhvbmcta29uZw?oc=5

2020-05-29 05:00:12Z
52780800526630