Kamis, 16 Januari 2020

Iran's Rouhani: Tehran now enriching more uranium than before Obama-era nuclear deal - Fox News

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said in a televised speech Thursday that Tehran is now enriching more uranium than before it agreed to the 2015 nuclear deal with world powers.

IRAN THREATENS EUROPEAN SOLDIERS, 'COULD BE IN DANGER'

“We are enriching more uranium before the deal was reached,” Rouhani said, according to The Associated Press. “Pressure has increased on Iran but we continue to progress.''

“We have no limits on the nuclear file, and we are increasing enrichment every day,” he added, according to a tweet from the Lebanon-based Al-Mayadeen Channel, which was publishing updates from the speech.

The remarks come after Britain, France, and Germany, which signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2015, sent a letter to the European Union’s foreign policy chief on Tuesday saying that they are triggering its “dispute mechanism” – which begins a process that could result in the U.N. restoring sanctions it previously lifted under the deal.

CLICK HERE FOR THE ALL-NEW FOXBUSINESS.COM

Trump withdrew U.S. support from the deal in May 2018 and has since gradually reimposed sanctions on Iran. As part of its response to the U.S. airstrike that killed top Iranian Quds Force Gen. Qassem Soleimani, Iran announced that it would no longer respect limits set on how many centrifuges it can use to enrich uranium.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiY2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZveG5ld3MuY29tL3dvcmxkL2lyYW5zLXJvdWhhbmktdGVocmFuLWVucmljaGluZy1tb3JlLXVyYW5pdW0tYmVmb3JlLW51Y2xlYXItZGVhbC1vYmFtYdIBZ2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZveG5ld3MuY29tL3dvcmxkL2lyYW5zLXJvdWhhbmktdGVocmFuLWVucmljaGluZy1tb3JlLXVyYW5pdW0tYmVmb3JlLW51Y2xlYXItZGVhbC1vYmFtYS5hbXA?oc=5

2020-01-16 08:47:24Z
52780553542893

Will Meghan Markle Bring Back 'The Tig' Now That She's Stepping Back As a Royal? - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Meghan, Duchess of Sussex and Prince Harry shook up the whole world when they recently revealed that they would be taking a step back and retiring as senior royals in order to focus on other projects. They revealed that starting their own charity is on the agenda, as well as taking steps towards becoming financially independent.

The royal couple did not state exactly how they plan to make their own income, leading royal watchers everywhere to do some serious speculation. Some believe Meghan will return to her former career, while others wonder if her special side-project will make a comeback in a monetized form.

Why are Meghan Markle and Prince Harry retiring as senior royals?

On January 8th, Meghan and Prince Harry posted a statement to their Instagram account. They announced their decision to “make a transition” by stepping back as senior royals.

Their statement revealed that they want to “work to become financially independent, while continuing to fully support Her Majesty The Queen.” They detailed how they plan to split their time between North America and the United Kingdom. This will, according to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, will enable them to raise their young son, Archie Harrison, with an appreciation for both his heritage and the world at large.

It is clear they want to provide a better life for their son, but it is also likely that the relentless media pressure over the past year has had at least a hand in influencing their decision. Meghan has undergone intense scrutiny, with the British tabloids questioning her every move.

Prince Harry has tirelessly defended her, with his own reputation taking a hit in the process. By stepping back, the couple will be less obligated to speak to the media directly and will be able to share announcements via their Instagram page.

What is ‘The Tig’?

Meghan, Duchess of Sussex attends the 91st Field of Remembrance at Westminster Abbey.
Meghan, Duchess of Sussex | Samir Hussein/WireImage

Before she met and married Prince Harry, Meghan was an actress, who had a leading role in the TV series Suits. Meghan was also a leading influencer on social media and loved to interact with her fans and followers.

In 2014, Meghan launched her very own lifestyle website called The Tig. The site featured Meghan’s favorite things, such as wine and beauty products, and gave her followers a glimpse into her day-to-day routine. Frequently, Meghan would share her treasured recipes and her favorite places to visit while traveling, as well as interviews with other celebrities and influencers.

In early 2017, a few months after beginning her romantic relationship with Prince Harry, Meghan shut down the website. While sources close to Meghan denied that the website shutting down had anything to do with Prince Harry and that she wanted to devote more of her time to humanitarian causes, it was clear that her new involvement with the royal family was at least partially responsible. 

Will Meghan Markle bring back ‘The Tig’?

There has been a lot of speculation in recent days that Meghan could return to acting as a way to make money once she and Prince Harry officially separate from the royal family.

While Meghan hasn’t said anything regarding a future in film or television, it seems more likely at this point that she and her husband will concentrate their efforts on public speaking, writing, and other humanitarian outreach efforts. While Meghan has reportedly signed on to do voiceover work for a Disney project, it’s not a monetized endeavor: the voiceover work is in exchange for a donation to a charity called Elephants Without Borders.

Still, it is possible Meghan will make some sort of return to the online space, and once she is no longer a senior member of the royal family, the guidelines that she has to follow will become less strict. With her new reach, Meghan could make Tig even more successful and monetize it so its revenue can help charities that are important to her.

Even if she doesn’t re-open The Tig, she could establish some other sort of direct outreach to followers and fans. After all, their Instagram page has become incredibly popular, and the couple has proven that they prefer to directly share information themselves, rather than relying on some outside source to disseminate information. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMie2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNoZWF0c2hlZXQuY29tL2VudGVydGFpbm1lbnQvd2lsbC1tZWdoYW4tbWFya2xlLWJyaW5nLWJhY2stdGhlLXRpZy1ub3ctdGhhdC1zaGVzLXN0ZXBwaW5nLWJhY2stYXMtYS1yb3lhbC5odG1sL9IBAA?oc=5

2020-01-16 08:00:16Z
52780542675596

Trump walking fine line in supporting Iran protesters - Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - With tweets of solidarity in Farsi and technological tools to circumvent internet shutdowns, U.S. President Donald Trump might be close to exhausting his options to support Iranian protesters rising up against their rulers.

FILE PHOTO - U.S. President Donald Trump arrives for a campaign rally at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, U.S., January 14, 2020. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

U.S. officials say the administration needs to avoid any overtures that could draw accusations of foreign meddling - like direct financing - and increase the chances of a violent crackdown on the people it wants to support.

The day after protests broke out in Tehran and other cities following Iran’s admission on Saturday after days of denials that it shot down a Ukrainian airliner, killing all 176 people aboard, Trump sent a tweet in Farsi aimed at Iran’s leaders: “DO NOT KILL YOUR PROTESTERS.” It was retweeted almost 80,000 times.

U.S. officials said the intent of Trump’s tweet and other voices of support within the administration was to reinforce the message that Washington stands in solidarity with the Iranian people, while helping shine a light on the motivation of the protesters and let the Tehran government know “we are paying attention.”

The demonstrators met a fierce police response in several places during four days of protests. In November, a crackdown on protests caused by fuel price hikes killed hundreds of people.

The Ukraine International Airlines flight from Tehran to Kiev was downed by Iranian air defenses when the armed forces were on high alert for U.S. reprisals, hours after Iran launched missiles against U.S. targets in Iraq in retaliation for a U.S. drone strike that killed top Iranian commander Qassem Soleimani on Jan. 3. Most of those on board were Iranians or dual citizens.

“We’re not looking for regime change or all-out war,” said one U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity. “We’re just telling you (that) you can’t have a nuclear weapon and don’t shoot protesters.”

The United States has worked with technology companies to help create tools for the Iranian people to circumvent Tehran’s restrictions on the internet, said Brian Hook, U.S. special representative for Iran. During the November protests, tens of thousands of people used those tools to communicate, he added.

“We’re going to continue to look for technology tools to help the Iranian people circumvent the regime censorship and internet shutdown,” Hook told Reuters when asked what tangible efforts Washington could offer to help protesters.

PUNISHING SANCTIONS

Some see hypocrisy in Trump’s show of concern.

While the administration emphasizes that it stands by the Iranian people, heavy U.S. sanctions reimposed by Trump have hastened the economy’s deterioration and worsened economic conditions for ordinary Iranians, experts say.

“His words carry almost no credibility with an Iranian public who saw him just now impose more sanctions,” said Aaron David Miller, senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

“So if you ask me if Trump has a public relations strategy when it comes to supporting these protests, the answer is no. It’s all driven by his moods, his political needs and his desire to separate himself from his predecessor.”

While the United States says its sanctions are laser-focused to hurt Iran’s leaders, many foreign banks and companies are deterred from doing business with the Islamic Republic, even for supplies of food and medicine, which are exempt from sanctions.

Democrats say there is more the White House can do to send a message to the Iranian people, such as lifting the ban on travel by Iranians to the United States. Iran was included in a travel ban Trump launched early in his presidency aimed at stopping the export of what Washington calls state-sponsored terrorism.

There has been no indication yet that Trump is considering doing so.

While some analysts believe the United States would not be totally uncomfortable with a regime change, Washington has reason to be wary of overstepping too much. The latest example of foreign diplomats landing in hot water in Iran came last week, when Britain’s ambassador to Tehran was briefly detained, accused of attending a protest.

“We leave the future of Iran to the Iranian people. It will not be decided by the United States government and that’s been our policy for almost three years,” Hook said.

Asked if Trump would post more on protesters, Hook said: “It would not surprise me. I think you can expect the president to continue communicating directly with Iranian people.”

Reporting by Steve Holland and Humeyra Pamuk; Editing by Mary Milliken and Peter Cooney

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMid2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJldXRlcnMuY29tL2FydGljbGUvdXMtaXJhbi1jcmFzaC10cnVtcC90cnVtcC13YWxraW5nLWZpbmUtbGluZS1pbi1zdXBwb3J0aW5nLWlyYW4tcHJvdGVzdGVycy1pZFVTS0JOMVpGMEVU0gE0aHR0cHM6Ly9tb2JpbGUucmV1dGVycy5jb20vYXJ0aWNsZS9hbXAvaWRVU0tCTjFaRjBFVA?oc=5

2020-01-16 05:06:00Z
52780554368040

Rabu, 15 Januari 2020

Days before Europeans warned Iran of nuclear deal violations, Trump secretly threatened to impose 25% tariff on European autos if they didn’t - The Washington Post

A week before Germany, France and Britain formally accused Iran of breaching the 2015 nuclear deal, the Trump administration issued a private threat to the Europeans that shocked officials in all three countries.

If they refused to call out Tehran and initiate an arcane dispute mechanism in the deal, the United States would impose a 25 percent tariff on European automobiles, the Trump officials warned, according to European officials familiar with the conversations.

Within days, the three countries would formally accuse Iran of violating the deal, triggering a recourse provision that could reimpose United Nations sanctions on Iran and unravel the last remaining vestiges of the Obama-era agreement.

The U.S. effort to coerce European foreign policy through tariffs, a move one European official equated to “extortion,” represents a new level of hardball tactics with America’s oldest allies, underscoring the extraordinary tumult in the transatlantic relationship.

President Trump has previously used the threat of a 25 percent tariff on automobiles to win more favorable terms in America’s trade relationship with the Europeans, but not to dictate the continent’s foreign policy.

It remains unclear if the threat was even necessary as Europeans had been signaling their intention to trigger the dispute resolution for weeks. While the U.S. views the mechanism as critical to re-imposing sanctions on Iran in as quickly as 65 days, the Europeans see the measure as a last chance to salvage a deal they view as vital to reducing tensions and limiting Iran’s nuclear program.

“The tariff threat is a mafia-like tactic and it’s not how relations between allies typically work,” said Jeremy Shapiro, the research director at the European Council on Foreign Relations.

When asked about the tariff warning, a senior U.S. official said, “We’ve been very clear that the JCPOA was a horrible deal,” referring to the Iran nuclear deal.

The U.S. official conceded that Europeans were already moving toward triggering the dispute resolution before the threat was issued last week.

“The consensus among the Europeans about the need to hold Tehran accountable took form weeks ago and was driven by Iran’s escalatory behavior and violations of the nuclear deal,” the official said.

European officials complained privately that Trump’s threat only complicated their decision on Tuesday to invoke the mechanism, which starts the clock on 65 days of negotiations with Iran about returning to full compliance with the deal. If the dispute isn’t settled, U.N. sanctions could be reimposed on Iran, including a blanket arms embargo.

Officials in Britain, France and Germany say they had planned to initiate the mechanism, but Trump’s threat nearly caused them to backtrack out of concern that they could be viewed as stooges of Washington if word of the threat ever leaked.

“We didn’t want to look weak, so we agreed to keep the existence of the threat a secret,” a European official said.

U.S. officials conveyed the threat directly to officials in London, Berlin and Paris rather than through their embassies in Washington, said a senior European official, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive negotiations.

Following the U.S. killing of Iran’s top commander, Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani, Iran said it was no longer bound by the limitations of the deal but would continue to cooperate with the International Atomic Energy Agency.

In the absence of a deal, Trump administration officials have struggled to explain how they will prevent Iran from getting closer to a nuclear weapon as they expand their enrichment of uranium. Trump, however, has declared that he will not permit that to happen. “IRAN WILL NEVER HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!” he tweeted last week.

Major difficulties in the transatlantic relationship began after Trump withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal in 2018 and reimposed sanctions on Iran that had been lifted in exchange for limitations on its nuclear program. The Europeans remained in the deal, noting that Iran had continued to comply with its side of the agreement according to the International Atomic Energy Agency.

Last year, Iran began taking gradual steps to exceed the limitations of the deal to pressure the Europeans to make good on their promises of sanctions relief. The 2015 agreement limited the number of centrifuges Iran could deploy for uranium enrichment and restricted how much uranium it could stockpile, among other requirements.

In a j oint statement on Tuesday, Britain, France and Germany initiated the dispute mechanism, saying they did so “in good faith, with the overarching objective of preserving the JCPOA and in the sincere hope of finding a way forward through constructive diplomatic dialogue.”

The nations also distanced themselves from the Trump administration’s “maximum pressure” campaign and said they opposed the U.S. withdrawal from the agreement in 2018. “Our hope is to bring Iran back into full compliance,” they said.

Some supporters of the Iran nuclear deal believe the Europeans made a mistake in triggering the mechanism on Tuesday even if their intention was to preserve the accord.

 Ali Vaez, an Iran nuclear expert at the International Crisis Group, said the measure could hurt Europe’s ability to mediate between the United States and Iran and is unlikely to “add much more economic pressure on Iran.”

It might “provoke a crisis that they claim they are trying to prevent unless the time and space created by intense diplomatic engagement is used to provide Iran with some economic reprieve as a means of returning it into JCPOA compliance,” he tweeted.

Following the Europeans’ announcement Tuesday, the State Department praised the triggering of the mechanism saying “we fully support the decision.”

“We agree with our allies that the goal is to stand with the Iranian people while exposing Tehran’s lawless behavior,” a State Department spokesman said.

Shane Harris contributed to this report.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__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_b3V0cHV0VHlwZT1hbXA?oc=5

2020-01-15 18:30:00Z
52780553542893

Russian government resigns after Putin proposes reforms that would weaken his successor - CNN

Putin thanked members of the government for their work but added that "not everything worked out." Putin added that in the near future he would meet with each member of the cabinet. The mass resignation includes Medvedev.
The surprise announcement came after Putin proposed constitutional amendments that would strengthen the powers of the prime minister and parliament at the expense of the presidency.
Handing parliament more power at the expense of presidential authority could signal a power shift that has been long speculated about in Russia.
Putin's critics have suggested that he is considering various scenarios to retain his grip on control after 2024, including the option of becoming prime minister with extended powers. Similarly, in 2008 Putin swapped places with the prime minister to circumvent the constitutional provision banning the same person from serving two consecutive terms.
Live updates: Russian government resigns in Putin power shakeup
In his statement, Medvedev indicated that the government was resigning to clear the way for Putin's proposed reforms.
Putin "outlined a number of fundamental changes to the constitution, significant changes not only to a number of articles of the constitution, but also to the balance of power as a whole," Medvedev said in his statement, which was aired on Russian state television.
"In this context, it's obvious that we, as the government ... should provide the president of our country with the opportunity to make all the decisions necessary for this. And in these conditions, I believe that it would be right, in accordance with Section 117 of the constitution," for the government to resign, Medvedev added.
In his annual address to the Federal Assembly earlier Wednesday, Putin said he agreed that no one should serve as president for more than two consecutive terms, and proposed several constitutional amendments.
His key proposal is to transfer the power to select the prime minister and cabinet from the president to the parliament.
"I know that a constitutional provision is being discussed in our society that the same person should not be president for more than two consecutive terms," Putin said. "I don't think this is a fundamental issue, but I agree with that," he said.
"I propose... entrusting the State Duma with the power to approve the candidacy of the prime minister, and then, per the prime minister's proposal, [appoint] all deputy prime ministers and federal ministers," Putin said. "In this case, the president will be obliged to appoint them, that is, he will not have the right to reject parliament-approved candidacies."
According to the current constitution, the president needs to secure approval from the lower house of parliament to appoint the head of the government, and it is within presidential rights to then appoint all deputies and ministers.
This is a breaking news story, more to follow...

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiZ2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNubi5jb20vMjAyMC8wMS8xNS9ldXJvcGUvcnVzc2lhbi1nb3Zlcm5tZW50LXJlc2lnbnMtdmxhZGltaXItcHV0aW4tcmVmb3Jtcy1pbnRsL2luZGV4Lmh0bWzSAWtodHRwczovL2FtcC5jbm4uY29tL2Nubi8yMDIwLzAxLzE1L2V1cm9wZS9ydXNzaWFuLWdvdmVybm1lbnQtcmVzaWducy12bGFkaW1pci1wdXRpbi1yZWZvcm1zLWludGwvaW5kZXguaHRtbA?oc=5

2020-01-15 14:41:00Z
52780554847034

Rouhani warns foreign forces in Middle East 'may be in danger' - Al Jazeera English

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani has told foreign powers to withdraw their forces from the Middle East, warning that they "may be in danger" if they remain in the region.

"Today, the American soldier is in danger, tomorrow the European soldier could be in danger," Hassan Rouhani said in televised remarks on Wednesday, without elaborating.

More:

The comments came a day after the United Kingdom, France and Germany challenged Tehran over breaking limits of a major nuclear deal signed in 2015 between Iran and six world powers.

The European nations announced on Tuesday that they triggered the dispute mechanism provided for in the landmark agreement in order to force Tehran to honour its commitments under the accord, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), from which US President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew in 2018. 

Rouhani's comments mark the first time he has threatened European countries amid heightened tensions with the US.

Friction in the region escalated in recent months after a series of attacks in the Gulf region that Washington blamed on Iran and its proxies, over Iranian denials. Fears of an all-out war emerged earlier in January after a US air strike killed top Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani in Baghdad, prompting retaliatory Iranian missile strikes against US targets in Iraq.

Nuclear deal

Separately, Rouhani also dismissed a proposal for a new "Trump deal" to replace the JCPOA, saying it was a "strange" offer and criticising the US president for breaking promises. 

UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who has praised Trump as a great dealmaker, called on Tuesday for Trump to replace the Iranian nuclear deal with his own new pact to ensure the Islamic republic does not get an atomic weapon - Iran has pledged that it does not seek the bomb.

200113143321384

"Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, @BorisJohnson, stated, 'We should replace the Iran deal with the Trump deal,'" Trump said in a tweet. "I agree!" 

Trump in May 2018 withdrew the US from the deal, in which Tehran had agreed to curb its nuclear programme in exchange for a reprieve from international sanctions. The US has since reimposed a range of sanctions on Tehran and called for negotiations over a new accord.

In response to the US move, Tehran has begun uranium enrichment again and enhancing its nuclear programme, while also accusing the European parties to the deal of failing to live up to their own commitments to provide economic relief to Tehran.

Reporting from Tehran, Al Jazeera's Assed Baig said Rouhani urged the European powers to live up to their commitments in the nuclear deal and not give in to US demands.

"Rouhani stressed that all the steps Iran took in response to the US withdrawal from the deal were reversible," Baig said.

"He said this is a good deal for Iran, but Tehran would keep fulfilling its commitments only if European parties to the deal do so as well."

Separately on Wednesday, Iranain Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif accused the European parties to the deal of violating its terms.

"They are not buying oil from us, all of their companies have withdrawn from Iran. So Europe is in violation," Zarif told a conference in New Delhi, saying the future of the deal now "depends on Europe".

He added that the European Union "is the largest global economy. So why do you allow the United States to bully you around?"

Zarif also said that the US killing of Soleimani had served only to strengthen the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, or ISIS) group.

"I think the war against Daesh [ISIL] just suffered a major setback, and Daesh just won a major victory," he said.

He also implied that the crisis sparked by the killing of Soleimani had contributed to Iran's accidental shooting down of a Ukrainian airliner on January 8, killing all 176 people on board.

"Why did it happen? Because there was a crisis. People make mistakes, unforgivable mistakes, but it happened in the time of the crisis," Zarif said.

Later on Wednesday, Iranian state media said the British ambassador to Iran had left the country, amid a dispute over his attendance at an anti-government demonstration. The state-run IRNA news agency reported that Robert Macaire had left Iran after being given "prior notice".

The British foreign office said that Macaire's trip to London was "routine, business as usual" and was pre-planned.

"It is quite normal for our ambassadors to come back to London to have meetings here," a foreign office spokesman said.

INTERACTIVE: US forces in the Middle East and Afghanistan

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMia2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmFsamF6ZWVyYS5jb20vbmV3cy8yMDIwLzAxL3JvdWhhbmktd2FybnMtZm9yZWlnbi1mb3JjZXMtbWlkZGxlLWVhc3QtZGFuZ2VyLTIwMDExNTA5MDI1NDAwMS5odG1s0gFvaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYWxqYXplZXJhLmNvbS9hbXAvbmV3cy8yMDIwLzAxL3JvdWhhbmktd2FybnMtZm9yZWlnbi1mb3JjZXMtbWlkZGxlLWVhc3QtZGFuZ2VyLTIwMDExNTA5MDI1NDAwMS5odG1s?oc=5

2020-01-15 12:48:00Z
52780553542893

Rouhani warns foreign forces in Middle East 'may be in danger' - Al Jazeera English

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani has told foreign powers to withdraw their forces from the Middle East, warning that they "may be in danger" if they remain in the region.

"Today, the American soldier is in danger, tomorrow the European soldier could be in danger," Hassan Rouhani said in televised remarks on Wednesday, without elaborating.

More:

The comments came a day after the United Kingdom, France and Germany challenged Tehran over breaking limits of a major nuclear deal signed in 2015 between Iran and six world powers.

The European nations announced on Tuesday that they triggered the dispute mechanism provided for in the landmark agreement in order to force Tehran to honour its commitments under the accord, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), from which US President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew in 2018. 

Rouhani's comments mark the first time he has threatened European countries amid heightened tensions with the US.

Friction in the region escalated in recent months after a series of attacks in the Gulf region that Washington blamed on Iran and its proxies, over Iranian denials. Fears of an all-out war emerged earlier in January after a US air strike killed top Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani in Baghdad, prompting retaliatory Iranian missile strikes against US targets in Iraq.

Nuclear deal

Separately, Rouhani also dismissed a proposal for a new "Trump deal" to replace the JCPOA, saying it was a "strange" offer and criticising the US president for breaking promises. 

UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who has praised Trump as a great dealmaker, called on Tuesday for Trump to replace the Iranian nuclear deal with his own new pact to ensure the Islamic republic does not get an atomic weapon - Iran has pledged that it does not seek the bomb.

200113143321384

"Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, @BorisJohnson, stated, 'We should replace the Iran deal with the Trump deal,'" Trump said in a tweet. "I agree!" 

Trump in May 2018 withdrew the US from the deal, in which Tehran had agreed to curb its nuclear programme in exchange for a reprieve from international sanctions. The US has since reimposed a range of sanctions on Tehran and called for negotiations over a new accord.

In response to the US move, Tehran has begun uranium enrichment again and enhancing its nuclear programme, while also accusing the European parties to the deal of failing to live up to their own commitments to provide economic relief to Tehran.

Reporting from Tehran, Al Jazeera's Assed Baig said Rouhani urged the European powers to live up to their commitments in the nuclear deal and not give in to US demands.

"Rouhani stressed that all the steps Iran took in response to the US withdrawal from the deal were reversible," Baig said.

"He said this is a good deal for Iran, but Tehran would keep fulfilling its commitments only if European parties to the deal do so as well."

Separately on Wednesday, Iranain Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif accused the European parties to the deal of violating its terms.

"They are not buying oil from us, all of their companies have withdrawn from Iran. So Europe is in violation," Zarif told a conference in New Delhi, saying the future of the deal now "depends on Europe".

He added that the European Union "is the largest global economy. So why do you allow the United States to bully you around?"

Zarif also said that the US killing of Soleimani had served only to strengthen the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL, or ISIS) group.

"I think the war against Daesh [ISIL] just suffered a major setback, and Daesh just won a major victory," he said.

He also implied that the crisis sparked by the killing of Soleimani had contributed to Iran's accidental shooting down of a Ukrainian airliner on January 8, killing all 176 people on board.

"Why did it happen? Because there was a crisis. People make mistakes, unforgivable mistakes, but it happened in the time of the crisis," Zarif said.

Later on Wednesday, Iranian state media said the British ambassador to Iran had left the country, amid a dispute over his attendance at an anti-government demonstration. The state-run IRNA news agency reported that Robert Macaire had left Iran after being given "prior notice".

The British foreign office said that Macaire's trip to London was "routine, business as usual" and was pre-planned.

"It is quite normal for our ambassadors to come back to London to have meetings here," a foreign office spokesman said.

INTERACTIVE: US forces in the Middle East and Afghanistan

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMia2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmFsamF6ZWVyYS5jb20vbmV3cy8yMDIwLzAxL3JvdWhhbmktd2FybnMtZm9yZWlnbi1mb3JjZXMtbWlkZGxlLWVhc3QtZGFuZ2VyLTIwMDExNTA5MDI1NDAwMS5odG1s0gFvaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYWxqYXplZXJhLmNvbS9hbXAvbmV3cy8yMDIwLzAxL3JvdWhhbmktd2FybnMtZm9yZWlnbi1mb3JjZXMtbWlkZGxlLWVhc3QtZGFuZ2VyLTIwMDExNTA5MDI1NDAwMS5odG1s?oc=5

2020-01-15 11:32:00Z
52780553542893