Senin, 11 November 2019

Day of rage plunges Hong Kong into turmoil after police shoot protester - The Washington Post

Kin Cheung AP Riot police fire tear gas in central Hong Kong on Monday.

HONG KONG — The shooting of a pro-democracy protester by Hong Kong police unleashed a chain of chaotic events on Monday, as thousands of demonstrators clashed with riot police in the city’s financial district and violent confrontations erupted at university campuses, plunging the Asian financial hub further into turmoil.

Tensions soared across the city. In the afternoon, police fired tear gas as a melee of protesters and office workers packed streets and flyovers in the downtown area. “Disband the police!” they shouted. Protesters threw debris into the road, brought traffic to a halt, and set fires. Later, a man was doused with liquid and set alight.

There had been calls for a general strike on Monday, the latest step in months of anti-government unrest that has convulsed the former British colony and posed a direct challenge to Chinese rule. But the immediate spark for the escalation came when a police officer fired live rounds in the Sai Wan Ho neighborhood early in the day, critically injuring a 21-year-old protester who appeared to be unarmed. Police confirmed that one man had been shot by an officer.

“It’s a police state in Hong Kong,” said Jerry, 26, a finance worker who joined the protests and gave only one name out of fear of retribution. “Police are murderers.”

[Hong Kong police shoot at pro-democracy protesters]

Throughout more than five months of unrest, Beijing has exhorted Hong Kong’s leaders to clamp down harder on the dissenters. Hong Kong authorities have obliged with thousands of arrests, draconian new laws, a barrage of tear gas, and the detention of pro-democracy lawmakers. A protester died Friday after falling in a parking garage several days earlier as police dispersed demonstrators nearby.

Yet far from blunting the democracy movement, the intensifying crackdown has prompted protesters to adopt more aggressive tactics. With the deeply divided city descending into disorder, there has been no sign that Beijing might change tack or allow the Hong Kong government to offer a political compromise.

Nicole Tung

Bloomberg

People react to tear gas fired by police in Hong Kong’s downtown area on Monday, after thousands took to the streets to protest the police shooting of a demonstrator.

“Senior officials have issued very draconian comments regarding the promulgation of a national security law and stepping up overall control,” said Willy Lam Wo-Lap, a professor of Chinese politics at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. “This, together with the death of the student protester last week, is responsible for today’s outbreak of disorder.”

Student protesters “see no future ahead of them” because of the government’s crackdown and refusal to compromise, Lam added. “It seems like Beijing wants to use [the escalating protests] as an excuse to impose tougher measures,” he said.

In Beijing, Foreign Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang declined to comment on the shooting of the protester, referring reporters to other government departments. The State Council did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

[Buffeted by trade war and Hong Kong protests, China’s Xi Jinping seeks to project stability]

At an evening news conference, Hong Kong chief executive Carrie Lam said protesters were “destroying society” and labeled them “the people’s enemy,” saying their actions had far exceeded demands for democracy. The government would not bow to such pressure, she said. Some 60 people had been injured in Monday’s clashes, she added.

Protests began in June when the Hong Kong leader tried to push through a now-shelved proposal to allow criminal suspects to face trial in mainland China. But the movement has widened into an uprising against Beijing’s encroachment on Hong Kong’s autonomy, encompassing demands for full democracy and police accountability.

The unrest has pushed the city into recession. On Monday, numerous shops were closed, train lines were shut and many workers unable to reach their offices. Universities canceled classes. Police said a petrol bomb was thrown into a subway car. A police officer who rode a motorcycle into a crowd of demonstrators was placed on leave pending an investigation.

In central Hong Kong, as police retreated in vans at one point in the afternoon, crowds on the footbridges above chanted “fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong!” Other onlookers shouted and threw debris at police vans.

Protesters occupied a main thoroughfare, erecting barricades and setting fires near high-end hotels. As protesters blocked a road tunnel, they clashed with onlookers and taxi drivers. Some travelers abandoned their cars and walked with their suitcases.

Kin Cheung

AP

Protesters burn debris to block a road on Monday. Hong Kong’s political crisis has pushed the city into turmoil.

Scuffles broke out between protesters and Chinese government supporters. Footage shared on social media showed two men arguing about national identity, before one man doused the other with liquid and set him alight. He was in critical condition, hospital officials said.

The Global Times, a Chinese nationalist state-run tabloid, seized on the incident as evidence that “black-clad rioters” were “destroying the city.”

At a news conference Monday, police defended the officer’s decision to open fire earlier in the day, saying the protester had wanted to take the officer’s firearm.

“He was under threat by two people; if he lost his gun he would be under severe threat. Hence, he decided to fire,” Kwok Pak-chung, regional commander of Hong Kong island, told reporters.

The condition of the man, who was struck in the abdomen, was not life-threatening, Kwok said.

[China’s ominous warning to Hong Kong: Less tolerance, more patriotic education]

The unrest marks the worst violence in Hong Kong in decades, posing a quandary for China’s leader, Xi Jinping, who has sought to bring Hong Kong to heel without resorting to Tiananmen Square-style bloodshed.

In the United States, Congress is considering a bill that would pave the way for sanctions against individuals who undermine Hong Kong’s autonomy. The bill, approved unanimously by the House, would require the U.S. government to consider annually whether it should continue to treat Hong Kong as a trading entity separate from mainland China in response to political developments. However, the bill is stuck in the Senate, where Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) so far has declined to bring it to a debate.

Hong Kong is governed by a “one country, two systems” arrangement under which Beijing pledged to maintain the territory’s relative freedoms and autonomy for half a century after its return to Chinese rule in 1997. But China has been tightening its grip, triggering anger in Hong Kong and uncertainty about its status as a global financial center.

At the heart of the stalemate is the fact that Hong Kong’s leader is not directly elected, but chosen by a committee that largely consists of Beijing loyalists. Many here perceive local authorities as conspiring with the Chinese government to undermine Hong Kong’s rule of law and bind the territory more closely with mainland China.

Shannon Stapleton

Reuters

A man extinguishes a fire set by protesters at the Hong Kong Polytechnic University on Monday.

There has been speculation the government might use the worsening violence as a pretext to suspend local district elections planned for Nov. 24, though so far officials have said they would like the vote to proceed if possible. Although Hong Kong does not have genuine universal suffrage, a quasi-democratic process exists to choose local district councilors.

The Electoral Affairs Commission issued a statement Monday urging the public to “keep calm and return to rationality,” to allow the elections to proceed.

“However, it is important to note that the smooth proceeding of [the] election owes much to the full co-operation of all Hong Kong citizens to create a safe environment for Hong Kong,” a spokesman said.

Separately, Hong Kong’s government sought to dispel “online rumors” that it would suspend work, school classes and trading on the city’s stock market, one of the world’s largest. Such claims were “absolutely not true,” a government spokesman said. The benchmark Hang Seng Index slumped more than 2.6 percent on Monday.

Carrie Lam, Hong Kong’s leader, has declined to launch an independent inquiry into the police force, insisting that the city wait for the outcome of a probe by the existing police watchdog, which has limited powers.

Amnesty International branded Monday’s shooting “another shocking low for the Hong Kong police” and called for an urgent independent examination.

In the meantime, protesters continue to turn their fury on police.

“They’re crazy. It’s outrageous,” said Kong, a 27-year-old woman on her lunch break, referring to Monday’s shooting. “They’ve lost control.”

David Crawshaw in Hong Kong and Liu Yang in Beijing contributed to this report.

Read more

Hong Kong police shoot at pro-democracy protesters

Buffeted by trade war and Hong Kong protests, China’s Xi Jinping seeks to project stability

China’s ominous warning to Hong Kong: Less tolerance, more patriotic education

Today’s coverage from Post correspondents around the world

Like Washington Post World on Facebook and stay updated on foreign news

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia-pacific/day-of-rage-plunges-hong-kong-into-turmoil-after-police-shoot-at-protesters/2019/11/11/4ae92456-0443-11ea-9118-25d6bd37dfb1_story.html

2019-11-11 10:38:00Z
52780432625865

Republicans push diversions and distractions ahead of this week's televised impeachment hearings - CNN

Trump himself aggressively squelched the one defense that could ease the political pain of moderate Republican lawmakers. He warned that it would be unacceptable for any Republican to argue his phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was inappropriate but did not meet the constitutional standards for removal.
"Republicans, don't be led into the fools trap of saying it was not perfect, but is not impeachable. No, it is much stronger than that. NOTHING WAS DONE WRONG!" Trump tweeted Sunday.
A fractured Senate looks to the past for impeachment trial game plan
Fierce political exchanges over the weekend offered a preview of how Republicans and Democrats will joust for advantage when the televised hearings get underway on Wednesday.
Republicans will seek to deflect, take the investigation down political rabbit holes and create a spectacle with an eye to Trump's conservative media cheerleaders and his supporters. They will also seek to confuse the case with details and factually dubious arguments designed to complicate it in the eyes of Americans watching the proceedings.
Democrats will battle to keep their simple abuse of power case from being corrupted by Republican attacks. They will try to turn the public against Trump by using witnesses drawn from political and military service -- like the current top US diplomat in Ukraine Bill Taylor on Wednesday and the ousted US ambassador to the country, Marie Yovanovitch, on Friday.
"They are going to hear immensely patriotic, beautifully articulate people telling the story of a President who ... extorted a vulnerable country by holding up military aid," Democratic Rep. Jim Himes of Connecticut said on NBC's "Meet the Press."
House Republicans ask for Hunter Biden and whistleblower to testify in impeachment probe
Trump supporters also took to Sunday talk shows. Their arguments reflect the reality that for Trump partisans the next few weeks will not necessarily be about finding the truth about what happened in his off-the-books foreign policy with Ukraine.
In a war for public opinion, they will instead seek to construct plausible narratives that can shield the President and themselves from any wider political backlash.
The President's friends are keen to talk about anything -- other than the currently easy-to-understand facts of the case that Democrats have been building through witness testimony.

The case against Trump

Trump stands accused of abusing his power by trying to coerce Ukraine to open an investigation into a domestic political opponent -- former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter. There is no evidence of wrongdoing by either Biden. Multiple witnesses have now testified that they believe he demanded a quid pro quo from Ukraine while holding up $400 million in military aid as it battled Russia.
But several Republicans argued Sunday that the President was merely worried about corruption in Kiev -- an argument that challenges credibility since it concerns a topic that Trump has rarely shown any interest in pursuing elsewhere in the world.
"The quid pro quo, in my judgment, is a red herring," said Sen. John Kennedy, a Louisiana Republican, on CBS' "Face the Nation." "Here are the two possible scenarios. Number one, the President asked for an investigation of a political rival. Number two, the President asked for an investigation of possible corruption by someone who happens to be a political rival."
This is what the whistleblower's attorney told House Republicans who asked client to testify in impeachment inquiry
"The latter would be in the national interest. The former would be in the President's parochial interests and would be over the line," Kennedy said, constructing an alternative narrative that offers Trump and GOP supporters a way out of a box.
Wisconsin GOP Sen. Ron Johnson also claimed on CNN's "State of the Union" that the President was concerned about good governance in Kiev, rather than seeking personal political advantage.
"When you're going to provide hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars into a system, you want to make sure it isn't corrupt," Johnson told CNN's Jake Tapper.
"I never heard the President say, 'I want to dig up dirt on 2020 opponents.'"
Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul made a novel argument -- that Trump's offense was merely to reach for the same kind of leverage that everyone else in Washington uses.
"I would make the argument that every politician in Washington, other than me, virtually, is trying to manipulate Ukraine to their purposes," he said.
"They're all doing it. They're all trying to manipulate Ukraine to get some kind of investigation -- either to end an investigation or start an investigation."
Paul's comments blur the issue. Biden's pressure on Ukraine during the Obama administration -- in common with the European Union and international organizations -- was motivated by a desire to improve investigations of corruption, not to shut them down.
Witness depositions appear to suggest that pressure by Trump and his personal attorney Rudy Giuliani was motivated by a desire to investigate Biden -- a potential 2020 rival -- and his son, who served on the board of a Ukrainian gas company.
Republicans are also expected to argue that while Democrats have built up evidence from foreign policy officials, they have yet to prove that Trump or those closest to him directly ordered the withholding of aid or asked for political concessions. The argument is perhaps their strongest opening to undermine the Democratic impeachment case.
Still, the refusal of the White House to make available witnesses like Giuliani, who was acting for Trump in Ukraine, and acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney allows Democrats to argue that the White House has something to hide.
The White House transcript of Trump's July 25 call with Zelensky shows that he asked his counterpart for a "favor" and requested he look into Biden and his son. And in a stunning moment in a White House briefing, Mulvaney effectively confirmed that a quid pro quo took place.

Republicans want the House hearings to probe Hunter Biden and the whistleblower

Several Republicans demanded testimony in impeachment hearings from Hunter Biden and called for a whistleblower who first raised the alarm about Ukraine to testify in public.
"I consider any impeachment in the House that doesn't allow us to know who the whistleblower is to be invalid, because without the whistleblower complaint, we wouldn't be talking about any of this," Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham said on Fox.
Graham: Impeachment inquiry is 'invalid' without whistleblower's testimony
"I also see the need for Hunter Biden to be called to adequately defend the President. And if you don't do those two things, it's a complete joke," the South Carolina Republican said.
House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, has already argued that exposing the identity of the whistleblower is unnecessary since the person's complaint has been confirmed by witness testimony.
"In light of the President's threats, the individual's appearance before us would only place their personal safety at grave risk," Schiff wrote in a Saturday letter to Rep. Devin Nunes, the ranking Republican on the Intelligence Committee, that was obtained by CNN's Manu Raju.
Democrats argue that calling for Hunter Biden to testify is irrelevant to the impeachment case -- since it is a constitutional proceeding designed solely to judge whether the President abused his power. And such a move would also in effect create the political investigation -- in Congress no less -- into the Bidens that Trump sought to get the Ukrainians to initiate.
Trump's Capitol Hill allies over the weekend lodged a list of witness requests apparently designed to cause havoc in the hearing room -- or a talking point when Democrats who have the power of the majority reject them.
They requested Hunter Biden and the whistleblower, but also Nellie Ohr, a former contractor for intelligence firm Fusion GPS, and Alexandra Chalupa, a former Democratic National Committee staffer.
Those two names suggest a Republican focus on unsubstantiated claims that Ukraine and not Russia interfered with the 2016 presidential election -- despite voluminous evidence and indictments of Moscow-linked suspects compiled by former special counsel Robert Mueller.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/11/politics/republicans-trump-impeachment-inquiry/index.html

2019-11-11 09:43:00Z
52780432741990

Hong Kong protester shot by police during Facebook live stream as demonstrators block major roads - The Independent

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. Hong Kong protester shot by police during Facebook live stream as demonstrators block major roads  The Independent
  2. Hong Kong Police Shoot Protesters  Bloomberg Politics
  3. Hong Kong police apparently shoot protester in video posted to Facebook  Fox News
  4. Man set alight hours after Hong Kong protester shot by police as clashes erupt citywide  CNN
  5. Hong Kong protests: Police shoot protester point blank with live round as tensions erupt  Express.co.uk
  6. View full coverage on Google News

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/hong-kong-protester-shooting-police-facebook-video-live-officer-a9197776.html

2019-11-11 07:26:00Z
52780432625865

Minggu, 10 November 2019

Australia bushfires: Sydney facing 'catastrophic' threat - BBC News

Australia is warning of a "catastrophic" bushfire threat to its largest city Sydney and surrounding areas on Tuesday.

Residents in vulnerable communities are being urged to leave and seek shelter in shopping centres.

At least three people are dead and thousands have been displaced by a weekend of bushfires in Australia.

On Sunday more than 100 blazes were still burning across New South Wales (NSW) and Queensland.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison - who was heckled by a climate change protester as he briefed reporters - refused to be drawn on whether climate change could have contributed to the fires.

"My only thoughts today are with those who have lost their lives and their families," he said.

What is the threat to Sydney?

Sydney is facing potentially catastrophic conditions for the first time since new fire warnings were introduced a decade ago. The Hunter region to the north is also at risk.

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Temperatures are expected to reach 37C in the city on Tuesday. Conditions are expected to be worse than on Friday, when the firestorms began tearing through parts of eastern Australia.

"Under these conditions, these fires will spread quickly and threaten homes and lives," NSW Rural Fire Service said in a statement.

Schools in vulnerable areas will be closed and firefighters from New Zealand have been flown in to help as weary emergency crews prepare for a fresh onslaught.

Mr Morrison says the military could also be called upon to support the 1,300 firefighters working in the two states.

Hundreds of civilians have also volunteered to help in affected areas.

What's the latest?

In Queensland, thousands of people spent the night in evacuation centres while officials assessed whether it was safe for them to return home.

Fire officials in NSW have confirmed that more than 150 homes have been destroyed.

Two firefighters were injured when a tree fell onto their truck in the Nambucca Heads area of NSW, officials said. They were treated at the scene and transferred to hospital in a stable condition.

Although cooler weather on Saturday night provided some reprieve, it is feared that high temperatures, low humidity and strong winds forecast from the middle of the week will fuel further fires that officials will be unable to contain.

Who were the victims?

While clearing affected areas on Friday, fire crews discovered the body of one victim in a burned out car near Glen Innes, about 550km (340 miles) north of Sydney.

In the same town on the same day, a woman was found suffering from severe burns. She was rushed to hospital but died shortly afterwards.

Carol Sparks, the mayor of Glen Innes, said on Sunday that the town's residents were traumatised.

"The fire was as high as 20 ft [6m] and raging with 80 km/h [50 mph] winds," she told Australian broadcaster ABC. "It was absolutely horrific for the people that were impacted."

On Saturday, NSW police confirmed that a third person had died after a body was found in a burnt-out home near Taree, a town about 300km north of Sydney.

Police said the home belonged to a woman aged 63, but that they wouldn't be able to confirm the person's identity until a post-mortem had been carried out.

In NSW, the worst-hit state, crews have fought hundreds of fires since last month, when two people died while trying to protect their home.

Earlier this month, a blaze burned though 2,000 hectares of bush which contained a koala sanctuary. Hundreds of the animals were feared to have died.

What about the drought?

Rains lashed NSW earlier this week, providing much relief to farmers. But the storms were not nearly enough to end the long-running drought.

Authorities in the state warn that many fires will continue to burn unless there is more rain.

"We just cannot overstate the profound impact that the drought is having on fire behaviour," Mr Fitzsimmons said.

Water-bombing aircraft are often flying long distances because of the difficulty of accessing water in dry areas. In some cases authorities have drilled bores to keep up with demand.

"We've very mindful of the scarcity of water and how precious it is, but the reality is we can't do firefighting without water," Mr Fitzsimmons said.

Is this linked to climate change?

Australia's fire season risks growing longer and more intense due to climate change, according to scientists.

Authorities said they were concerned about the severity of the fires ahead of its hottest months, a year after the nation experienced its warmest summer on record.

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Officials have confirmed that 2018 and 2017 were Australia's third and fourth-hottest years on record respectively.

The bureau's State of the Climate 2018 report said climate change had led to an increase in extreme heat events and increased the severity of other natural disasters, such as drought.

Even if global temperatures are contained to a 2C rise above pre-industrial levels - a limit set out in the landmark Paris accord, agreed by 188 nations in 2015 - scientists believe the country is facing a dangerous new normal.

Last year, a UN report said Australia was falling short in efforts to cut its CO2 emissions.


Have you been affected by the bushfires? Share your experiences by emailing haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk.

Please include a contact number if you are willing to speak to a BBC journalist. You can also contact us in the following ways:

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-50365131

2019-11-10 12:45:09Z
52780430174497

Bolivia's Morales to call fresh election after OAS audit - BBC News

Bolivia's President Evo Morales has said he will call a new election after international monitors questioned the result of last month's race.

Speaking at a news conference, the long-standing leader also pledged to replace members of the country's election board.

The Organization of American States (OAS), which monitored the elections, called for the result to be annulled.

Mr Morales' announcement comes after weeks of anti-government protests.

The president, who was first elected in 2006, denies any wrongdoing and has ignored calls to resign.

He told reporters that he made the decision "to reduce all tension" and pacify Bolivia.

Members of the new electoral board will be chosen by the country's parliament, he added.

What did the OAS say?

In its preliminary report on Saturday, the OAS said it had found "clear manipulations" of Bolivia's voting system and it could not verify the result of the 20 October race.

The international body concluded it was unlikely that Mr Morales had won by the 10% margin required for a victory in the first round.

"The manipulations to the computer system are of such magnitude that they must be deeply investigated by the Bolivian State to get to the bottom of and assign responsibility in this serious case," it said.

Why has there been opposition to the election result?

Bolivia has been rattled by protests, strikes and road blocks since the night of the election.

At least three people have died during clashes. The mayor of a small town was also attacked by protesters earlier this week, who dragged her through the streets barefoot, covered her in red paint and forcibly cut her hair.

Tensions first flared after the results count was inexplicably paused for 24 hours.

The final result gave Mr Morales slightly more than the 10% lead he needed to win outright, giving him a fourth consecutive term.

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Carlos Mesa, the election's runner up, asked Bolivia's congress on Friday to pass an emergency bill to prepare for new elections.

In an escalation of protests on Saturday, opposition supporters overran two state-run media outlets in La Paz and forced them off air.

On the same day a number of uniformed police officers also joined crowds of demonstrators in several major cities.

Mr Morales condemned the seizure of the TV and radio stations, but Bolivia's defence minister said there were no plans to deploy the military to quell the police "mutiny".

Bolivia's armed forces have also called for the crisis to be solved by democratic means.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-50365340

2019-11-10 12:14:29Z
52780430510517

India detains dozens over social media posts, celebrations after religious site ruling - Reuters

LUCKNOW/AYODHYA, India, India (Reuters) - Dozens of people in India have been detained on suspicion of publishing inflammatory social media posts and setting off celebratory firecrackers after the Supreme Court ruled to give a disputed religious site to Hindus, police said on Sunday.

Police officers stand guard at a security barricade near a temple after Supreme Court's verdict on a disputed religious site, in Ayodhya, India, November 10, 2019. REUTERS/Danish Siddiqui

The Supreme Court awarded the bitterly contested site in the northern town of Ayodhya to Hindus on Saturday, dealing a defeat to Muslims who also claim the land that has sparked some of the country’s bloodiest riots since independence.

In 1992, a Hindu mob destroyed the 16th-century Babri Mosque on the site, triggering riots in which about 2,000 people, most of them Muslims, were killed, but no major violence was reported after the court ruling on Saturday or on Sunday

About 37 people were arrested and 12 cases were registered in Uttar Pradesh, India’s most populous state and the site of the contested land, state police said.

At least one person was arrested in the state capital of Lucknow for making “inappropriate remarks” on social media and using threatening language.

“Police are appealing to residents to not misuse social media,” Kalanidhi Naithani, senior superintendent of police in Lucknow, said late on Saturday.

In another part of the state, at least seven men were arrested for setting off firecrackers or creating disturbances while distributing sweets in celebration, police said.

The Home Ministry did not immediately respond to a request for information on arrests.

Before Saturday’s verdict, the government deployed thousands of members of paramilitary forces and police in Ayodhya and other sensitive places. Hindu groups told members not to celebrate publicly.

The court’s decision paves the way for the construction of a Hindu temple on the site, a proposal long supported by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ruling Hindu-nationalist party.

Hindus believe the site is the birthplace of Lord Ram, a physical incarnation of the Hindu god Vishnu, and say the site was holy for Hindus long before the Muslim Mughals, India’s most prominent Islamic rulers, built the Babri mosque there in 1528.

The Supreme Court called the 1992 demolition of the mosque illegal but handed the plot of 2.77 acres (1.1 hectares), about the size of a soccer field, to a Hindu group. It directed that another plot of five acres in Ayodhya be provided to a Muslim group that contested the case.

Some legal scholars and Muslim activists saw the judgement as unfair, particularly given that the 1992 razing of the mosque was deemed illegal.

“Why has the 2.77 acres been gifted to the very elements who were party to this?,” Syeda Hameed, the president of the Muslim Women’s Forum, wrote in the Hindustan Times, referring to the mosque’s destruction.

Muslim leaders have called for peace between majority Hindus and Muslims, who constitute 14% of its 1.3 billion people.

Some seemed to have resigned themselves to the decision.

“I am disheartened with the verdict and leaving it to Allah,” said Mohammad Azam Qadri, a community leader in Ayodhya.

Writing by Abhirup Roy; Editing by Alexandra Ulmer, Robert Birsel

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-india-religion-temple/india-detains-dozens-over-social-media-posts-celebrations-after-religious-site-ruling-idUSKBN1XK04Y

2019-11-10 08:48:00Z
52780428432287

Bolivia protests: Ruling party urges support for Evo Morales - BBC News

Bolivia's governing party has called on its supporters to defend President Evo Morales, after police in some cities joined protests against him.

Demonstrators accuse Mr Morales, Latin America's longest-serving leader, of rigging last month's election to secure a fourth term.

On Saturday, opposition protesters overran two state-run media outlets in La Paz and forced them off air.

Mr Morales denies any wrongdoing and says he will not resign.

He also condemned the seizure of the TV and radio stations , tweeting: "They [the protesters] say they defend democracy, but they behave as if they were in a dictatorship."

Media playback is unsupported on your device

The country's defence minister said there were no plans to deploy the military to quell the police "mutiny".

For their part, Bolivia's armed forces said they would never go against the people and that the crisis needs to be solved by democratic means.

So far, three people have died and hundreds have been injured in the unrest, which has lasted more than four weeks.

The president's main rival, Carlos Mesa, has rejected an offer of dialogue - instead insisting on new elections and Mr Morales' resignation.

What do we know about the demonstrations?

Mr Morales' party Movement for Socialism called on its supporters to come to La Paz and "defend" the results of the controversial election.

The previous day's demonstrations, on Friday, were the first to include large numbers of police - though the scale was unclear.

Uniformed officers joined protesters in cities including La Paz and Sucre.

Speaking to local media, several uniformed officers called on Mr Morales to resign - and said they would stop him from turning Bolivia into a dictatorship like his allies in Cuba and Venezuela.

In a tweet, President Morales denounced the protests as an "attack on the rule of law".

Defence Minister Javier Zabaleta, speaking with state television, called for calm and said he was confident police would "continue to fulfil their constitutional job to safeguard the people".

Earlier this week, the mayor of a small town was attacked by protesters who dragged her through the streets barefoot, covered her in red paint and forcibly cut her hair.

Why are people protesting?

Bolivia has been rattled by protests, strikes and roadblocks since the country held a presidential election on 20 October.

Tensions first flared on the night of the presidential election after the results count was inexplicably paused for 24 hours. The final result gave Mr Morales slightly more than the 10-percentage-point lead he needed to win outright in the first round of the race.

The Organization of American States (OAS) is conducting an audit of the votes, and the results are expected to be published next week.

But Mr Mesa - the candidate who finished second - has spoken out against the audit, saying that his party was not consulted.

A former president himself, he has asked Bolivia's congress to pass an emergency bill to prepare for new elections.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-50363765

2019-11-10 03:41:18Z
52780430510517