Minggu, 10 November 2019

Biden expresses shock that Trump considers attending Russia May Day event | TheHill - The Hill

Democratic presidential candidate Joe BidenJoe BidenCentrist Democrats seize on state election wins to rail against Warren's agenda Nunes demands Schiff testify behind closed doors in Trump impeachment inquiry Chris Hayes and his audience troll Trump: 'Yes, Read the Transcript!' MORE expressed surprise after he learned that President TrumpDonald John TrumpKey impeachment witnesses to know as public hearings begin Centrist Democrats seize on state election wins to rail against Warren's agenda Nunes demands Schiff testify behind closed doors in Trump impeachment inquiry MORE was thinking about attending Russia's May Day event next year

After being told the news by a reporter, Biden said "Are you serious?" according to a clip posted Saturday by CNN

"You're kidding me," the former vice president added. "Are you joking?"

Trump indicated Friday that he would like to accept Russian President Vladimir Putin's invitation to the May Day Parade in Moscow, but said he might not because it is during the presidential campaign season. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s a very big deal, celebrating the end of the war,” Trump told reporters. “I appreciate the invitation. It’s right in the middle of the political season.”

White House hopeful Kamala HarrisKamala Devi HarrisCentrist Democrats seize on state election wins to rail against Warren's agenda Krystal Ball praises former McConnell aide's historic win in Kentucky Saagar Enjeti: Bloomberg 2020 bid would 'all but ensure a Bernie Sanders victory' MORE (D-Calif.) also jabbed at Trump over the matter, tweeting, "Always nice to spend time with supporters on the campaign trail."

Trump has faced scrutiny over his relationship with Russia, including after he said it was "possible" he would invite Putin to next year's Group of Seven summit.

The Justice Department's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election also found that  Russia aimed to help Trump win the contest, but did not establish that the Trump campaign conspired with Moscow. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/469764-biden-expressed-shock-that-trump-considers-attending-russia-may-day-event

2019-11-10 03:12:35Z
52780431716973

Sabtu, 09 November 2019

Australia wildfire victim's frantic last words to daughter-in-law: 'We're on fire!' - Fox News

Wildfires have ripped through Australia's most populated state, claiming three lives, destroying at least 150 homes and forcing more than 1,300 people to flee, according to officials.

Over 35 people have been injured, including 16 of the 1,500 firefighters battling fires across New South Wales.

Vivian Chaplain, 69, one of the three killed as more than 81 blazes continued to scar the area Saturday afternoon, spoke to her daughter-in-law as flames surrounded her home, according to Sky News.

AUSTRALIAN MEN, WOMEN SOCCER PLAYERS CLOSE GENDER PAY GAP

Firefighters tackle a bushfire to save a home in Taree, 350km north of Sydney on November 9, 2019 as they try to contain dozens of out-of-control blazes that are raging in the state of New South Wales. - At least two people have died and 100 homes have been destroyed as an unprecedented number of bushfires tore through eastern Australia. (Photo by PETER PARKS / AFP) (Photo by PETER PARKS/AFP via Getty Images)

Firefighters tackle a bushfire to save a home in Taree, 350km north of Sydney on November 9, 2019 as they try to contain dozens of out-of-control blazes that are raging in the state of New South Wales. - At least two people have died and 100 homes have been destroyed as an unprecedented number of bushfires tore through eastern Australia. (Photo by PETER PARKS / AFP) (Photo by PETER PARKS/AFP via Getty Images)

"I was the last one to speak to her. She was in absolute panic," Chrystal Harwood said. "'We're on fire! There's fire everywhere!'"

"Before I even got to tell her to just get out, she'd hung up on me. I couldn't get back through to her. I tried so many times," Harwood said. "She was amazing. She was such a strong, loving woman."

Harwood used social media to make an urgent plea for a rescue on Friday.

"Viv is alone can someone help, anyone, please ...," Harwood posted. "'The RFS can't get to her they are trying...the road down is a tunnel of fire."

The Rural Fire Service said Chaplain died in the hospital after authorities found her unconscious with severe burns near Glen Innes, according to The Guardian.

"The reports were initially burns to 40 to 50 percent of her body," RFS Commissioner Shane Fitzsimmons told abc.net.au.

Firefighters found another body Saturday morning in a burned car near Glenn Innes -- a victim of the same fire that killed Chaplain.

PILOT DIES WHEN SMALL PLANE CRASHES INTO CALIFORNIA HOME: AUTHORITIES

New South Wales police said another unidentified body was found in a burned-out building at Johns River. An autopsy will determine whether the victim is the 63-year-old woman who owns the house.

Only one fire remained at the emergency-warning level in New South Wales on Saturday afternoon. On Friday, 17 fires were given that status.

But Fitzsimmons warned people to brace themselves for more trouble, with hot and windy conditions expected to return Tuesday, making firefighting difficult.

Firefighters tackle a bushfire to save a home in Taree, 350km north of Sydney on November 9, 2019 as they try to contain dozens of out-of-control blazes that are raging in the state of New South Wales. - At least two people have died and 100 homes have been destroyed as an unprecedented number of bushfires tore through eastern Australia. (Photo by PETER PARKS / AFP) (Photo by PETER PARKS/AFP via Getty Images)

Firefighters tackle a bushfire to save a home in Taree, 350km north of Sydney on November 9, 2019 as they try to contain dozens of out-of-control blazes that are raging in the state of New South Wales. - At least two people have died and 100 homes have been destroyed as an unprecedented number of bushfires tore through eastern Australia. (Photo by PETER PARKS / AFP) (Photo by PETER PARKS/AFP via Getty Images)

“We are expecting widespread, severe, extreme fire danger ratings,” Fitzsimmons said.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison warned Australians to expect more bad news from the fire zones.

"The devastating and horrific fires that we have seen, particularly in New South Wales but also in Queensland, have been absolutely chilling," Morrison said.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The Australian wildfire season started early this year after an unusually warm and dry winter.

The Associated Press contributed to this report

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-wildfires-three-victims-describes-last-words-were-on-fire

2019-11-09 17:59:01Z
52780430174497

As Hindus rejoice, Muslim reaction mixed over Ayodhya verdict - Al Jazeera English

Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India - There was heightened security in Ayodhya, a town in north India, ahead of the Supreme Court's verdict on a site claimed by both Muslims and Hindus.

Early on Saturday, the town looked deserted as residents stayed inside their homes, waiting for the decision to be announced.

Some had even stocked up on food in advance, just in case the decision provoked anger, violence and eventually a curfew in this historic town.

191108225122075

But when India's top court delivered its verdict, Hindu-majority Ayodhya slowly went back to normal, with people back in the streets.

A heavy police presence did not deter locals from venturing out and expressing their happiness or reservations about the landmark judgement.

In a verdict that disappointed Muslims, the court awarded Hindus control of the site, paving the way for the construction of a temple.

A 16th-century mosque, known as Babri Masjid, had been at the site until December 6, 1992, when it was destroyed by Hindu mobs. The country later witnessed some of the deadliest religious riots since independence, in which thousands of mostly Muslim Indians were killed.

Hindus believe that Lord Ram, the warrior god, was born at the site in Ayodhya and claim that the first Mughal emperor Babur built the mosque on top of a temple there.

On Saturday, five judges led by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi also directed the Indian government to allot five acres (two hectares) of land to Muslims to build a mosque, and acknowledged that the demolition in 1992 violated the rule of the law.

The Supreme Court directed the government to form a committee within three months to lead the construction of the temple.

Hindus rejoice

Hindus in Ayodhya hailed the judgement, saying it respected the interests of both Hindus and Muslims.

Some congratulated each other on the streets as others chanted "Jai Shree Ram" (Hail Lord Ram), a religious slogan that was politicised in the early 1990s during the Ram Temple Movement, which led to the demolition of Babri Mosque.

190425090431381

"It is a historic day for all Hindus across the world and I am really proud at how the Supreme Court handled the entire issue. There couldn't have been a better judgement than this," Bharat Das, a Hindu priest at a temple in Ayodhya, told Al Jazeera.

"I even welcome the decision by the court to provide alternate land to Muslims. This verdict will strengthen the bond between the Hindus and the Muslims in the country."

Rajendra Tiwari, who owns a small shop in the town, welcomed the judgement for economic reasons.

"If a huge Ram temple is built in Ayodhya, it will boost the local economy as more tourists would flock to the town," he said. "This would mean better business opportunities for people like me.

"The economy of Ayodhya is totally dependent on Ram and if there are no tourists, we will have nothing to eat.

"Even Muslims can't deny that fact. The people of this town, irrespective of their religion, should prosper and this decision has done that."

Mixed reactions among Muslims

Reactions among the Muslim community in Ayodhya were mixed.

Some welcomed the decision, others rejected it, and there was a feeling of resignation - that Muslims had no choice but to accept the court's decision.

There was also a sense of relief, that the outcome ends a dispute that had become the biggest fault line between the two communities in India.

"We want closure and the Supreme Court has shown us the way. We have no issues if [the temple] is built there but we would have been happier if the court had specified the place where the mosque would be built," said Babu Bhai, a member of the Babri Mosque Citizen Resolution Committee.

Akram Khan, a resident, welcomed the decision: "Senior members of our community, who were also part of the negotiations, have already said that they respect and welcome the court judgement, so there is no reason why we should differ.

"Our five generations have witnessed so much hostility because of this dispute and if this is how the court feels it should be addressed, we welcome it."

Meanwhile, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board said that it was not satisfied as it promised to evaluate legal options, including filing a review petition.

Critics speak out online

Critics of the decision were vocal on social media, with some saying the verdict was a faith-based decision.

Kapil Komireddi, an Indian author and journalist, wrote on Twitter: "What happened today is not the end of a distressing chapter in our history. It is the beginning of a calamitous phase. What they did in Ayodhya they will seek to replicate in a dozen other places. And the horror of Ayodhya will seem trivial as they go about avenging history."

Writer Rana Ayyub said: "The privileged who did not suffer through the anti-Muslim carnage post the Babri demolition in 1992 are talking about closure. Closure for whom?"

International lawyer Suchitra Vijayan wrote on Twitter: "The Hindu Rashtra (Hindu polity) is here & this is the beginning of an epoch of fear. In the years to come Ayodhya, & Gujarat pogrom will pale in comparison. We will remember the men who were meant to defend our constitution, abdicate their responsibility to truth & justice."

Several people said they agreed with the arguments of law professor Faizan Mustafa.

In the Huffington Post on Saturday, Mustafa said: "It looks like the Supreme Court gave importance to belief over other concerns. The court, even while observing that faith is limited to individual believer and that it cannot determine a land dispute, eventually gave the disputed land for the construction of a Hindu temple.

"This means that belief of a section of people was given prominence over the rule of law even though the latter should have ideally determined a property dispute."

Government, opposition on verdict

Prime Minister Narendra Modi said the verdict should not be seen as a victory or loss for anybody.

"The calm and peace maintained by [1.3 billion] Indians in the run-up to today's verdict manifests India's inherent commitment to peaceful coexistence," Modi said. "May this very spirit of unity and togetherness power the development trajectory of our nation. May every Indian be empowered."

191001121023091

Opposition parties welcomed the court's decision and called for peace and harmony in the country.

However, there was some backlash from opposition politician Asaduddin Owaisi, the president of All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen.

"If the Babri Masjid wasn't demolished that day, what would the judgement have been today?" he said. "There has been discrimination against Muslims and no one can deny it. We are fighting for our legal rights."

He dismissed the promise of an alternative plot of land for Muslims, saying he feared that other mosques in the country could see Hindu nationalists making similar claims.

Valay Singh, the author of Ayodhya: City of Faith, City of Discord, described the verdict as a "landmark judgement".

"What is even more interesting is how not even one judge dissented," he told Al Jazeera, "which says a lot about the times that we live in".

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/11/hindus-rejoice-muslim-reaction-mixed-ayodhya-verdict-191109131954176.html

2019-11-09 17:33:00Z
52780428432287

As Hindus rejoice, Muslim reaction mixed over Ayodhya verdict - Al Jazeera English

Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India - There was heightened security in Ayodhya, a town in north India, ahead of the Supreme Court's verdict on a site claimed by both Muslims and Hindus.

Early on Saturday, the town looked deserted as residents stayed inside their homes, waiting for the decision to be announced.

Some had even stocked up on food in advance, just in case the decision provoked anger, violence and eventually a curfew in this historic town.

191108225122075

But when India's top court delivered its verdict, Hindu-majority Ayodhya slowly went back to normal, with people back in the streets.

A heavy police presence did not deter locals from venturing out and expressing their happiness or reservations about the landmark judgement.

In a landmark verdict that disappointed Muslims, the court awarded Hindus control of the site, paving the way for the construction of a temple.

A 16th-century mosque, known as Babri Masjid, had been at the site until December 6, 1992, when it was destroyed by Hindu mobs. The country later witnessed some of the deadliest religious riots since independence, in which thousands of mostly Muslim Indians were killed.

Hindus believe that Lord Ram, the warrior god, was born at the site in Ayodhya and claim that the first Mughal emperor Babur built the mosque on top of a temple there.

On Saturday, a five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi also directed the Indian government to allot five acres (two hectares) of land to Muslims to build a mosque, and said that the demolition in 1992 was a violation of the rule of the law and should be remedied.

The Supreme Court directed the government to formulate a committee within three months to lead the construction of the temple.

Hindus rejoice

Hindus in Ayodhya hailed the judgement, with many saying it respected the interests of both Hindus and Muslims.

Some congratulated each other on the streets as others chanted "Jai Shree Ram" (Hail Lord Ram), a religious slogan that was politicised in the early 1990s during the Ram Temple Movement, which led to the demolition of Babri Mosque.

190425090431381

"It is a historic day for all Hindus across the world and I am really proud at how the Supreme Court handled the entire issue. There couldn't have been a better judgement than this," Bharat Das, a Hindu priest at a temple in Ayodhya, told Al Jazeera.

"I even welcome the decision by the court to provide alternate land to Muslims. This verdict will strengthen the bond between the Hindus and the Muslims in the country."

Rajendra Tiwari, who owns a small shop in the town, welcomed the judgement for economic reasons.

"If a huge Ram temple is built in Ayodhya, it will boost the local economy as more tourists would flock to the town," he said. "This would mean better business opportunities for people like me.

"The economy of Ayodhya is totally dependent on Ram and if there are no tourists, we will have nothing to eat.

"Even Muslims can't deny that fact. The people of this town, irrespective of their religion, should prosper and this decision has done that."

Mixed reactions among Muslims

Reactions among the Muslim community in Ayodhya were mixed.

Some welcomed the decision, others rejected it, and there was also a feeling of resignation in the town - that Muslims had no choice but to accept the court's decision.

There was also a sense of relief, that the outcome was the best possible way to end a dispute that had become the biggest fault line between the two communities in India.

"We want closure and the Supreme Court has shown us the way. We have no issues if Ram Mandir is built there but we would have been happier if the court had specified the place where the mosque would be built," said Babu Bhai, a member of the Babri Mosque Citizen Resolution Committee.

Akram Khan, a resident, welcomed the decision: "Senior members of our community, who were also part of the negotiations, have already said that they respect and welcome the court judgement, so there is no reason why we should differ.

"Our five generations have witnessed so much hostility because of this dispute and if this is how the court feels it should be addressed, we welcome it."

Meanwhile, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board said that it was not satisfied as it promised to evaluate legal options, including filing a review petition.

Critics speak out online

Critics of the decision were vocal on social media, with some saying the verdict was a faith-based decision.

Kapil Komireddi, an Indian author and journalist, wrote on Twitter: "What happened today is not the end of a distressing chapter in our history. It is the beginning of a calamitous phase. What they did in Ayodhya they will seek to replicate in a dozen other places. And the horror of Ayodhya will seem trivial as they go about avenging history."

Writer Rana Ayyub said: "The privileged who did not suffer through the anti-Muslim carnage post the Babri demolition in 1992 are talking about closure. Closure for whom?"

International lawyer Suchitra Vijayan wrote on Twitter: "The Hindu Rashtra (Hindu polity) is here & this is the beginning of an epoch of fear. In the years to come Ayodhya, & Gujarat pogrom will pale in comparison. We will remember the men who were meant to defend our constitution, abdicate their responsibility to truth & justice."

Several people said they agreed with the arguments of law professor Faizan Mustafa.

In the Huffington Post on Saturday, he wrote: "It looks like the Supreme Court gave importance to belief over other concerns. The court, even while observing that faith is limited to individual believer and that it cannot determine a land dispute, eventually gave the disputed land for the construction of a Hindu temple.

"This means that belief of a section of people was given prominence over the rule of law even though the latter should have ideally determined a property dispute."

Government, opposition on verdict

Prime Minister Narendra Modi said the verdict should not be seen as a win or loss for anybody.

"The calm and peace maintained by [1.3 billion] Indians in the run-up to today's verdict manifests India's inherent commitment to peaceful coexistence," Modi said. "May this very spirit of unity and togetherness power the development trajectory of our nation. May every Indian be empowered."

191001121023091

Opposition parties welcomed the court's decision and called for peace and harmony in the country.

However, there was some backlash from opposition politician Asaduddin Owaisi, the president of All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen.

"If the Babri Masjid wasn't demolished that day, what would the judgement have been today?" he said. "There has been discrimination against Muslims and no one can deny it. We are fighting for our legal rights."

He dismissed the promise of an alternative plot of land for Muslims, saying he feared that other mosques in the country could see Hindu nationalists making similar claims.

Valay Singh, the author of Ayodhya: City of Faith, City of Discord, described the verdict as a "landmark judgement".

"What is even more interesting is how not even one judge dissented," he told Al Jazeera, "which says a lot about the times that we live in".

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/11/hindus-rejoice-muslim-reaction-mixed-ayodhya-verdict-191109131954176.html

2019-11-09 17:11:00Z
52780428432287

As Hindus rejoice, Muslim reaction mixed over Ayodhya verdict - Al Jazeera English

Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India - There was heightened security in Ayodhya, a town in north India, ahead of the Supreme Court's verdict on a site claimed by both Muslims and Hindus.

Early on Saturday, the town looked deserted as residents stayed inside their homes, waiting for the decision to be announced.

Some had even stocked up on food in advance, just in case the decision provoked anger, violence and eventually a curfew in this historic town.

191108225122075

But when India's top court delivered its verdict, Hindu-majority Ayodhya slowly went back to normal, with people back in the streets.

A heavy police presence did not deter locals from venturing out and expressing their happiness or reservations about the landmark judgement.

In a landmark verdict that disappointed some Muslims, the court awarded Hindus control of the site, paving the way for the construction of a temple.

A 16th-century mosque, known as Babri Masjid, had been at the site until December 6, 1992, when it was destroyed by Hindu mobs.

Hindus believe that Lord Ram, the warrior god, was born at the site and claim that the first Mughal emperor Babur built the mosque on top of a temple there.

On Saturday, a five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi also directed the Indian government to allot five acres (two hectares) of land to Muslims to build a mosque, and said that the demolition in 1992 was a violation of the rule of the law and should be remedied.

The Supreme Court directed the government to formulate a committee within three months to lead the construction of the temple.

Hindus rejoice

Hindus in Ayodhya hailed the judgement, with many saying it respected the interests of both Hindus and Muslims.

Some congratulated each other on the streets as others chanted "Jai Shree Ram" (Hail Lord Ram), a religious slogan that was politicised in the early 1990s during the Ram Temple Movement, which led to the demolition of Babri Mosque.

190425090431381

"It is a historic day for all Hindus across the world and I am really proud at how the Supreme Court handled the entire issue. There couldn't have been a better judgement than this," Bharat Das, a Hindu priest at a temple in Ayodhya, told Al Jazeera.

"I even welcome the decision by the court to provide alternate land to Muslims. This verdict will strengthen the bond between the Hindus and the Muslims in the country."

Rajendra Tiwari, who owns a small shop in the town, welcomed the judgement for economic reasons.

"If a huge Ram temple is built in Ayodhya, it will boost the local economy as more tourists would flock to the town," he said. "This would mean better business opportunities for people like me.

"The economy of Ayodhya is totally dependent on Ram and if there are no tourists, we will have nothing to eat.

"Even Muslims can't deny that fact. The people of this town, irrespective of their religion, should prosper and this decision has done that."

Mixed reactions among Muslims

Reactions among the Muslim community were mixed.

Some welcomed the decision, others rejected it, and there was also a feeling of resignation in the town - that Muslims had no choice but to accept the court's decision.

There was also a sense of relief, that the outcome was the best possible way to end a dispute that had become the biggest fault line between the two communities in India.

"We want closure and the Supreme Court has shown us the way. We have no issues if Ram Mandir is built there but we would have been happier if the court had specified the place where the mosque would be built," said Babu Bhai, a member of the Babri Mosque Citizen Resolution Committee.

Akram Khan, a resident, welcomed the decision: "Senior members of our community, who were also part of the negotiations, have already said that they respect and welcome the court judgement, so there is no reason why we should differ.

"Our five generations have witnessed so much hostility because of this dispute and if this is how the court feels it should be addressed, we welcome it."

Meanwhile, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board said that it was not satisfied as it promised to evaluate legal options, including filing a review petition.

Government, opposition on verdict

Prime Minister Narendra Modi said the verdict should not be seen as a win or loss for anybody.

"The calm and peace maintained by [1.3 billion] Indians in the run-up to today's verdict manifests India's inherent commitment to peaceful coexistence," Modi said. "May this very spirit of unity and togetherness power the development trajectory of our nation. May every Indian be empowered."

191001121023091

Opposition parties welcomed the court's decision and called for peace and harmony in the country.

However, there was some backlash from opposition politician Asaduddin Owaisi, the president of All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen.

"If the Babri Masjid wasn't demolished that day, what would the judgement have been today?" he said. "There has been discrimination against Muslims and no one can deny it. We are fighting for our legal rights."

He dismissed the promise of an alternative plot of land for Muslims, saying he feared that other mosques in the country could see Hindu nationalists making similar claims.

Valay Singh, the author of Ayodhya: City of Faith, City of Discord, described the verdict as a "landmark judgement".

"What is even more interesting is how not even one judge dissented," he told Al Jazeera, "which says a lot about the times that we live in".

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/11/hindus-rejoice-muslim-reaction-mixed-ayodhya-verdict-191109131954176.html

2019-11-09 15:16:00Z
52780428432287

Three Hong Kong pro-democracy lawmakers arrested as tensions soar over student death - New York Post

A government clampdown in Hong Kong led to the arrest of three pro-democracy lawmakers and summonses issued for four more, the day after the death of a student injured during the ongoing protests.

Protesters held multiple vigils for “martyrs” and many demanded revenge for the death of 22-year-old Chow Tsz-Lok, who fell off a parking garage on Monday after police fired tear gas to force demonstrators to disperse, according to Reuters.

Police said the three lawmakers were detained Saturday and charged with obstructing the local assembly during a rowdy meeting on May 11 over the extradition bill that sparked the protest movement, now in its 24th week, The Associated Press reported. The others received summons to turn up at police stations Saturday to face arrest.

Other lawmakers who support the pro-democracy movement criticized the arrests as a move that was intended to provoke more violence, which could be used as an excuse to postpone or cancel Nov. 24 district elections —local elections that are seen as a way to measure sentiment.

“We’ll say no to their plans,” lawmaker Tanya Chan told a news conference. Referring to the upcoming vote, she said “it is a de facto referendum for all Hong Kong voters to cast their vote and say no to police brutality and say no to our unjust system. And this is definitely our chance to show our determination.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://nypost.com/2019/11/09/three-hong-kong-pro-democracy-lawmakers-arrested-as-tensions-soar-over-student-death/

2019-11-09 14:44:00Z
52780429263227

Germany marks 30 years since the fall of the Berlin Wall - CNN

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8dtZMf9odY

2019-11-09 13:57:19Z
CCAiC1g4ZHRaTWY5b2RZmAEB