Senin, 14 Oktober 2019

Syria Live Updates: Assad’s Forces Move Into Area Hit by Turkey - The New York Times

Image
CreditDelil Souleiman/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

The Syrian Army entered the town of Tel Tamer in northeastern Syria, the state news media reported on Monday, soon after the government of President Bashar al-Assad forged an alliance with the Kurdish forces that control the region.

The return of government forces to northeastern Syria not only deals a blow to Kurdish-led forces who were supported by the United States, but also signals a major shift in Syria’s eight-year war.

The Syrian government had been almost entirely absent from the northeast since it withdrew or was chased out by armed rebels. The Syrian Democratic Forces, a Kurdish-led militia that worked with the United States to fight the Islamic State, soon became the region’s overarching political force.

Although the Syrian Kurds did not declare Mr. Assad’s government an enemy, Mr. Assad distrusted their efforts to establish self rule and vowed to retake all of Syria’s territory. But he had no way to do so, especially as American troops remained in the area.

President Trump’s decision last week to move those troops out of the way of a Turkish incursion gave Mr. Assad an opening, and his forces began to fill it on Monday.

In some towns, they were welcomed by locals who chanted nationalistic slogans and carried Mr. Assad’s photograph. In other areas, trucks drove large numbers of Syrian soldiers into the area to take up positions.

Image

Listen to ‘The Daily’: A Kurdish General on His People’s Plight

The Americans promised they would protect his people. Now, one Kurdish leader is forced to turn to former foes for help.

Tel Tamer is a strategic crossroads that connects northeastern Syria with the country’s northern hub, Aleppo, and is 20 miles from Ras al Ain, the center of the Turkish assault.

If Syrian government forces can reach the Turkish border to the north and the Iraqi border to the east, it would be a major breakthrough in Mr. Assad’s quest to re-establish his control over the whole country.

Syrian government forces also entered the town of Ain Issa on Monday, a day after it was briefly overrun by Turkish-led troops. Around 500 ISIS sympathizers took advantage of the mayhem and escaped detention, local officials said.

Syrian state television showed long lines of Syrian Army vehicles in Ain Issa on Monday, greeted by a group of cheering residents. “We’ve been waiting for you for a long time,” one woman said.

A soldier held up his gun and said, “I’m here to kick out the Turkish mercenaries.”

Foreign ministers from all 28 European Union member states agreed unanimously on Monday to stop selling arms to Turkey, the first time the bloc reached such a decision about a NATO ally.

In a joint statement from the foreign ministers, the bloc condemned Turkey’s incursion into northeastern Syria, agreeing on strong wording despite initial concerns from Britain.

“The E.U. condemns Turkey’s military action, which seriously undermines the stability and the security of the whole region, resulting in more civilians suffering and further displacement and severely hindering access to humanitarian assistance,” the ministers said.

The legal and practical elements of such a move are complicated: Like most European Union nations, Turkey is a NATO member. European officials decided that the best way to enforce the ban was through suspending licensing for arms sales in individual European capitals, making it a national move.

This complexity was reflected in the joint statement: Citing earlier plans from France and Germany “to immediately halt arms exports licensing to Turkey,” the ministers said that “member states commit to strong national positions regarding their arms export policy to Turkey.”

The decision is expected to be most significant for Germany, a major source of weapons for Turkey. Britain, France and Italy also sell arms to Turkey.

It has been only a week since President Trump pulled back American forces in Syria and effectively gave Turkey the green light to cross the border and pursue its own military agenda. Alliances are shifting, ISIS is reinvigorated and the lives of thousands of civilians are endangered.

Embittered at their abandonment by their American allies, Kurdish leaders moved to secure a new partner: the government of Bashar al-Assad, an avowed foe of the United States.

Late Sunday, the Syrian Democratic Forces, said they had struck a deal with the Assad government that would allow government forces to enter the Kurdish-controlled northeast of Syria for the first time in years. The commander of the S.D.F. wrote an article for Foreign Policy that explained the reasoning behind the deal.

The commander, Mazloum Abdi, said that in the absence of American help against the Turkish invasion, he had no option but to seek help from the Syrian Army and their Russian allies, even though “we do not trust their promises.”

“We know that we would have to make painful compromises with Moscow and Bashar al-Assad if we go down the road of working with them,” he added. “But if we have to choose between compromises and the genocide of our people, we will surely choose life for our people.”

Trump administration officials once argued that keeping Mr. Assad’s forces out of the territory was crucial to stemming Iranian and Russian influence in Syria. But with American troops on the way out, Washington has lost its leverage.

“The worst thing in military logic and comrades in the trench is betrayal,” said one official allied with the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces.

Some American military members who had worked closely with the Kurdish militia were also appalled.

“They trusted us and we broke that trust,” said one Army officer who has worked alongside the Kurds in northern Syria. “It’s a stain on the American conscience.”

President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey said on Monday that his troops would continue to support an invasion of parts of northern Syria, despite the return of Syrian government forces.

Speaking at a news conference, Mr. Erdogan said a Turkish-backed force would press on with attempts to capture Manbij, a town at the crossroads of two major highways that the Kurdish authorities in northern Syria have handed over to the Syrian government.

The invasion of Manbij would be led on the ground by Syrian Arab militias, but would have Turkish backing, Mr. Erdogan said. The Turkish president appeared to be more ambivalent about Kobani, a Kurdish-run city on the Syrian border that Mr. Erdogan had previously threatened to capture. It was the scene of a fierce battle between Kurdish fighters and ISIS extremists in 2014 and 2015 that ended in an ISIS retreat.

Mr. Erdogan implied on Monday that an agreement about Kobani had been reached with the Russian government, Syria’s main international backer, though his meaning was unclear.

“In Kobani with Russia’s positive approach, it seems like there won’t be a problem,” Mr. Erdogan said, without elaborating.

The official Turkish explanation for the offensive was to clear the area of the Kurdish-led militia that has close ties with a terrorist group that is banned in Turkey.

At the start of the invasion, Turkish officials said they respected Syrian sovereignty.

But on Monday, Yasin Aktay, an adviser to Mr. Erdogan, said on Twitter that “the fact that Syrian Army has made a deal” with the Kurdish militia “will not stop Turkey’s antiterror operation.”

A second presidential adviser, Ibrahim Kalin, later tweeted that “Turkey will not stop until we reach our goals.” Turkish officials have previously promised to create a buffer zone along the length of its border with Syria, roughly 20 miles deep.

Turkish troops shelled within 550 yards of an American observation post in northern Syria late Friday while United States troops were in the area, according to a military situation report obtained by The New York Times.

Since 2016, the United States has maintained several camps in northern Syria, including a post near the town of Kobani, as part of an international alliance fighting the Islamic State.

The military report undermines both American and Turkish narratives about the shelling, which was first reported on Friday by Newsweek. In American news reports over the weekend, unidentified officials variously claimed that the Turkish shelling was probably deliberate, that it was intense and that it had hit areas on both sides of the American post. In an official statement, the Pentagon said only that Turkish forces had shelled within a few hundred meters of American troops.

In response, Turkey’s Defense Ministry said that the strike was an accident and that its forces had fired on Kurdish troops around 1,000 yards from the American outpost. But the military situation report contests both the anonymous American briefings and the Turkish account.

A map shows two Turkish artillery strikes two miles west of the American outpost and one strike landing roughly 300 to 500 yards southwest of the post, closer than the Turks acknowledged, but less intense than some United States officials have claimed.

The military report said that the shelling near the American post was probably an accident, and added that further misfires by Turkish forces could not be ruled out.

The United States had no greater ally in driving out the Islamic State militants who claimed vast swathes of Syria in the quest for a modern-day caliphate than the coalition of fighters known as the Syrian Democratic Forces.

Inch by inch, the Kurdish-led militia, working with its American military partners, drove ISIS militants out of their strongholds.

But another United States ally viewed the militia much less fondly: Turkey. Its leaders looked across their southern border and saw not an ally but a threat to its territorial integrity, given the militia’s ties to Kurdish separatists in Turkey.

With Turkish-led forces now threatening the Kurds, the S.D.F. has turned its attention away from the Islamic State, including those militants captured during the war and held in detention camps. Already, some ISIS members said to have escaped, along with hundreds of their family members. A planned transfer of five dozen “high-value” detainees to the United States from Syria never happened.

Between escaped ISIS members and the Islamist sleeper cells believed to have been left behind when the militants were defeated in Syria, there is concern that the world has not seen the last of the extremist group.

Where Turkish forces struck Kurdish-held areas

Qamishli

Turkey

Kobani

Ras al Ain

Akcakale

Turkey’s proposed

buffer zone

Tel Abyad

Suluk

Hasaka

Manbij

Ain Issa

KURDISH

Control

ISIS members’ families escape from detention.

SYRIA

Government

Control

10 MILES

Turkish army AND

syrian opposition

Turkey

Manbij

Hasaka

Aleppo

Idlib

Raqqa

KURDISH

Control

Other

opposition

Latakia

Government

Control

Deir al-Zour

Hama

Homs

Palmyra

Albu Kamal

Syria

lebanon

Iraq

Damascus

Dara‘a

Sweida

Jordan

20 MILES

Qamishli

Turkey

Kobani

Ras al Ain

Akcakale

Turkey’s proposed

buffer zone

Tel Abyad

Manbij

Suluk

Ain Issa

Hasaka

ISIS members’ families escape from detention.

SYRIA

20 MILES

Raqqa

Turkish army

AND syrian

opposition

Turkey

Manbij

Aleppo

KURDISH

Control

Raqqa

Other

opposition

Government

Control

Syria

Damascus

Iraq

Jordan

Qamishli

Turkey

Ras al Ain

Kobani

Akcakale

Turkey’s proposed

buffer zone

Tel Abyad

Suluk

Manbij

Ain Issa

Hasaka

ISIS members’ families escape from detention.

SYRIA

20 MILES

Raqqa

Turkish army AND

syrian opposition

Turkey

Manbij

Aleppo

KURDISH

Control

Raqqa

Other

opposition

Government

Control

Syria

Damascus

Iraq

Jordan

Sources: Times reporting; Control areas via Conflict Monitor by IHS Markit | By Sarah Almukhtar, Allison McCann and Anjali Singhvi

Reporting was contributed by Carlotta Gall, Ben Hubbard, Charlie Savage, Eric Schmitt, Patrick Kingsley, Hwaida Saad, Matina Stevis-Gridneff, Anna Momigliano, Anton Troianovski, Eric Nagourney, Russell Goldman and Megan Specia.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/14/world/middleeast/turkey-syria.html

2019-10-14 12:12:56Z
52780401824835

Brexit: Queen's speech in Parliament kicks off crucial week of negotiations - NBC News

Behind the stage door however there is serious political maneuvering taking place.

Brexit talks are ongoing in Brussels, Belgium, and Prime Minister Boris Johnson says he can conjure a Brexit divorce deal acceptable to both European leaders and British lawmakers. This is no mean feat given that the stated red lines of both parties directly contradict each other.

If there is to be a deal, it appears someone will have to budge before the end of this week, when E.U. leaders meet to pass or reject any deal at a high-stakes summit.

Then there will be a rare weekend session of the U.K. Parliament, its first sitting on a Saturday since the Falklands War between the U.K. and Argentina in 1982, where lawmakers will be asked to ratify the deal.

Both the U.K. and E.U. disagree on how to solve the problem of Northern Ireland, which would suffer greatly in the event if a "no-deal" Brexit.

Johnson's initial plan was rejected, but a meeting last week with his Irish counterpart, Leo Varadkar, produced a modicum of hope a deal can be achieved.

Oct. 8, 201902:55

On Monday, the Queen's Speech was delivered by Queen Elizabeth II — although the speech itself is actually written by the government as a way to announce its policy agenda.

"My Government's priority has always been to secure the United Kingdom's departure from the European Union on 31 October," she said, reading the government's words. "My Government intends to work towards a new partnership with the European Union, based on free trade and friendly cooperation."

In reality, Johnson does not have enough power in Parliament to achieve any of the aims, however — meaning the U.K. is almost certainly headed for an election soon.

Aside from an uncompromising Brexit stance, other policies announced by the government through the queen included tougher jail sentences and stricter immigration controls.

But before policy came pageantry. The day was kicked off by the queen's bodyguard leading a torch-lit search for gunpowder in the basement of the House of Commons. This dates to 1605 when a group of Catholics failed in a plot to blow up Parliament and kill the Protestant King James I.

The arcane rituals didn't stop there. Before the queen was able to leave Buckingham Palace for Parliament, one lawmaker was held hostage at the royal residence to ensure the monarch's safe return. This oddity is a nod to King Charles I, whose fractious relationship with Parliament ultimately led to the English Civil War and his own beheading in 1649.

It's this historic tension — ensuring the sovereign does not exceed their power and encroach on the duties of Parliament — that underpins much of the formalities on display.

When the queen finally left the palace, she did so by horse-drawn coach flanked by more ceremonial bodyguards on horseback. Her royal regalia, the Imperial State Crown, the Cap of Maintenance and the Sword of State, traveled in their own coach out ahead.

Once there, she changed into the Robe of State, which features an 18-foot-long velvet train that weighs more than 15 lbs. She used to wear the Imperial State Crown, which comes in at a hefty 2.3 lbs thanks to its 2,868 diamonds and hundreds of other precious stones — although these days she leaves it on its own table.

The queen doesn't enter the House of Commons, owing to Charles I's somewhat testy relationship with that chamber. So elected lawmakers were instead summoned to the Lords by a senior official known as "Black Rod," real name Sarah Clarke. As part of the ceremony, she had the Commons door slammed in her face, and was only allowed to enter after three knocks with her eponymous black and gold staff.

Eventually, the queen delivered the speech from her throne. The packed chamber included periwigged judges and other members wearing robes that are themselves hundreds of years old in some cases.

Lawmakers then got down to a day of debating the government's policies — which, this being 2019, will probably revolve mostly around Brexit.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/brexit-referendum/brexit-queen-s-speech-parliament-kicks-crucial-week-negotiations-n1065646

2019-10-14 12:27:00Z
52780406083772

Syria Live Updates: Assad’s Forces Move Into Area Hit by Turkey - The New York Times

Image
CreditDelil Souleiman/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

The Syrian Army entered the town of Tel Tamer in northeastern Syria, the state news media reported on Monday, soon after the government of President Bashar al-Assad forged an alliance with the Kurdish forces that control the region.

The return of Mr. al-Assad’s forces to the area for the first time in nearly a decade signaled a major shift in the power dynamic there. For years, Kurdish-led forces held control of the area, eventually fending off Islamic State militants with the support of the United States.

Tel Tamer, a strategic crossroads that connects northeastern Syria with the country’s northern hub, Aleppo, is 20 miles from Ras al Ain, the center of the Turkish assault.

Tel Tamer was once home to hundreds of Christians before ISIS overran the territory and claimed it as part of its self-declared caliphate in 2015. Kurdish-led fighters repelled the Islamist extremists and held the town with the backing of American troops until President Trump abruptly withdrew them from the region last week.

Image

Listen to ‘The Daily’: A Kurdish General on His People’s Plight

The Americans promised they would protect his people. Now, one Kurdish leader is forced to turn to former foes for help.

Syrian state television showed about half a dozen Syrian soldiers milling around a pickup truck mounted with a machine gun. They were greeted by a small crowd of local residents, some of whom carried portraits of Mr. Assad.

Syrian government forces also entered the town of Ain Issa on Monday, a day after it was briefly overrun by Turkish-led troops. Around 500 ISIS sympathizers took advantage of the mayhem and escaped detention, local officials said.

Syrian state television showed long lines of Syrian Army vehicles in Ain Issa on Monday, greeted by a group of cheering residents. “We’ve been waiting for you for a long time,” one woman said.

A soldier held up his gun and said, “I’m here to kick out the Turkish mercenaries.”

It has been only a week since President Trump pulled back American forces in Syria and effectively gave Turkey the green light to cross the border and pursue its own military agenda. Alliances are shifting, ISIS is reinvigorated and the lives of thousands of civilians are endangered.

Embittered at their abandonment by their American allies, Kurdish leaders moved to secure a new partner: the government of Bashar al-Assad, an avowed foe of the United States.

Late Sunday, the Syrian Democratic Forces, said they had struck a deal with the Assad government that would allow government forces to enter the Kurdish-controlled northeast of Syria for the first time in years. The commander of the S.D.F. wrote an article for Foreign Policy that explained the reasoning behind the deal.

The commander, Mazloum Abdi, said that in the absence of American help against the Turkish invasion, he had no option but to seek help from the Syrian Army and their Russian allies, even though “we do not trust their promises.”

“We know that we would have to make painful compromises with Moscow and Bashar al-Assad if we go down the road of working with them,” he added. “But if we have to choose between compromises and the genocide of our people, we will surely choose life for our people.”

Trump administration officials once argued that keeping Mr. Assad’s forces out of the territory was crucial to stemming Iranian and Russian influence in Syria. But with American troops on the way out, Washington has lost its leverage.

“The worst thing in military logic and comrades in the trench is betrayal,” said one official allied with the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces.

Some American military members who had worked closely with the Kurdish militia were also appalled.

“They trusted us and we broke that trust,” said one Army officer who has worked alongside the Kurds in northern Syria. “It’s a stain on the American conscience.”

President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey said on Monday that his troops would continue to support an invasion of parts of northern Syria, despite the return of Syrian government forces.

Speaking at a news conference, Mr. Erdogan said a Turkish-backed force would press on with attempts to capture Manbij, a town at the crossroads of two major highways that the Kurdish authorities in northern Syria have handed over to the Syrian government.

The invasion of Manbij would be led on the ground by Syrian Arab militias, but would have Turkish backing, Mr. Erdogan said. The Turkish president appeared to be more ambivalent about Kobani, a Kurdish-run city on the Syrian border that Mr. Erdogan had previously threatened to capture. It was the scene of a fierce battle between Kurdish fighters and ISIS extremists in 2014 and 2015 that ended in an ISIS retreat.

Mr. Erdogan implied on Monday that an agreement about Kobani had been reached with the Russian government, Syria’s main international backer, though his meaning was unclear.

“In Kobani with Russia’s positive approach, it seems like there won’t be a problem,” Mr. Erdogan said, without elaborating.

The official Turkish explanation for the offensive was to clear the area of the Kurdish-led militia that has close ties with a terrorist group that is banned in Turkey.

At the start of the invasion, Turkish officials said they respected Syrian sovereignty.

But on Monday, Yasin Aktay, an adviser to Mr. Erdogan, said on Twitter that “the fact that Syrian Army has made a deal” with the Kurdish militia “will not stop Turkey’s antiterror operation.”

A second presidential adviser, Ibrahim Kalin, later tweeted that “Turkey will not stop until we reach our goals.” Turkish officials have previously promised to create a buffer zone along the length of its border with Syria, roughly 20 miles deep.

Turkish troops shelled within 550 yards of an American observation post in northern Syria late Friday while United States troops were in the area, according to a military situation report obtained by The New York Times.

Since 2016, the United States has maintained several camps in northern Syria, including a post near the town of Kobani, as part of an international alliance fighting the Islamic State.

The military report undermines both American and Turkish narratives about the shelling, which was first reported on Friday by Newsweek. In American news reports over the weekend, unidentified officials variously claimed that the Turkish shelling was probably deliberate, that it was intense and that it had hit areas on both sides of the American post. In an official statement, the Pentagon said only that Turkish forces had shelled within a few hundred meters of American troops.

In response, Turkey’s Defense Ministry said that the strike was an accident and that its forces had fired on Kurdish troops around 1,000 yards from the American outpost. But the military situation report contests both the anonymous American briefings and the Turkish account.

A map shows two Turkish artillery strikes two miles west of the American outpost and one strike landing roughly 300 to 500 yards southwest of the post, closer than the Turks acknowledged, but less intense than some United States officials have claimed.

The military report said that the shelling near the American post was probably an accident, and added that further misfires by Turkish forces could not be ruled out.

The foreign ministers of European Union member states meet in Luxembourg on Monday, and among the issues up for debate is a Swedish proposal for a bloc-wide arms embargo on Turkey. The proposal could be endorsed by the 28 heads of government meeting in Brussels later this week.

Germany and France announced plans this weekend to curb arms sales to Turkey over the incursion into Syria, raising the prospect of a broader ban. Additionally, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany called for “an immediate cessation to the military operation” in northern Syria, according to a government statement.

But other European nations have been slower to condemn the offensive. Italy insists that any ban on arms sales should come from the European Union level, not from individual members.

Turkey is the main buyer of Italian arms exports, and a ban on sales could deliver a major blow to an already faltering economy. Turkey accounted for 15 percent of Italy’s total weapons exports between 2014 and 2018, according to a report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

But Italy is facing pressure to take a similar line as Germany and France. Josep Borrell, the European Union’s incoming foreign policy chief, said as he made his way to the foreign ministers’ meeting that “for the time being we need to stop any kind of flow of arms to Turkey.”

The United States had no greater ally in driving out the Islamic State militants who claimed vast swathes of Syria in the quest for a modern-day caliphate than the coalition of fighters known as the Syrian Democratic Forces.

Inch by inch, the Kurdish-led militia, working with its American military partners, drove ISIS militants out of their strongholds.

But another United States ally viewed the militia much less fondly: Turkey. Its leaders looked across their southern border and saw not an ally but a threat to its territorial integrity, given the militia’s ties to Kurdish separatists in Turkey.

With Turkish-led forces now threatening the Kurds, the S.D.F. has turned its attention away from the Islamic State, including those militants captured during the war and held in detention camps. Already, some ISIS members said to have escaped, along with hundreds of their family members. A planned transfer of five dozen “high-value” detainees to the United States from Syria never happened.

Between escaped ISIS members and the Islamist sleeper cells believed to have been left behind when the militants were defeated in Syria, there is concern that the world has not seen the last of the extremist group.

Where Turkish forces struck Kurdish-held areas

Qamishli

Turkey

Kobani

Ras al Ain

Akcakale

Turkey’s proposed

buffer zone

Tel Abyad

Suluk

Hasaka

Manbij

Ain Issa

KURDISH

Control

ISIS members’ families escape from detention.

SYRIA

Government

Control

10 MILES

Turkish army AND

syrian opposition

Turkey

Manbij

Hasaka

Aleppo

Idlib

Raqqa

KURDISH

Control

Other

opposition

Latakia

Government

Control

Deir al-Zour

Hama

Homs

Palmyra

Albu Kamal

Syria

lebanon

Iraq

Damascus

Dara‘a

Sweida

Jordan

20 MILES

Qamishli

Turkey

Kobani

Ras al Ain

Akcakale

Turkey’s proposed

buffer zone

Tel Abyad

Manbij

Suluk

Ain Issa

Hasaka

ISIS members’ families escape from detention.

SYRIA

20 MILES

Raqqa

Turkish army

AND syrian

opposition

Turkey

Manbij

Aleppo

KURDISH

Control

Raqqa

Other

opposition

Government

Control

Syria

Damascus

Iraq

Jordan

Qamishli

Turkey

Ras al Ain

Kobani

Akcakale

Turkey’s proposed

buffer zone

Tel Abyad

Suluk

Manbij

Ain Issa

Hasaka

ISIS members’ families escape from detention.

SYRIA

20 MILES

Raqqa

Turkish army AND

syrian opposition

Turkey

Manbij

Aleppo

KURDISH

Control

Raqqa

Other

opposition

Government

Control

Syria

Damascus

Iraq

Jordan

Sources: Times reporting; Control areas via Conflict Monitor by IHS Markit | By Sarah Almukhtar, Allison McCann and Anjali Singhvi

Reporting was contributed by Carlotta Gall, Ben Hubbard, Charlie Savage, Eric Schmitt, Patrick Kingsley, Hwaida Saad, Matina Stevis-Gridneff, Anna Momigliano, Anton Troianovski, Eric Nagourney, Russell Goldman and Megan Specia.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/14/world/middleeast/turkey-syria.html

2019-10-14 11:44:30Z
52780401824835

Queen's Speech 2019 - The Sun

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxlVM6oTAFE

2019-10-14 10:57:18Z
52780408464678

Spanish Supreme Court sentences Catalan separatists to prison, sparking protests - The Washington Post

MADRID — Spain’s Supreme Court sentenced nine Catalan separatist leaders Monday to prison terms of between nine and 13 years, a ruling that triggered immediate protests and a police response.

A 2017 referendum on Catalan independence, which Madrid deemed illegal, and the subsequent trial of those behind it have split Spanish society like no other events since the country’s democratic transition in the mid-1970s after the death of dictator Francisco Franco.

In response to Monday’s ruling, separatist sympathizers in Catalonia vowed massive civil disobedience in a rejection of a process they deemed overly harsh. National police forces descended on Barcelona, the Catalan capital, as demonstrations began in haste.

“These have been political proceedings, putting people on trial solely and exclusively for their political ideas,” said Alfred Bosch, Catalonia’s Minister for Foreign Action, Institutional Relations and Transparency.

“The prison sentences imposed upon the nine Catalan leaders represent a historical error that, far from solving the problem, merely worsens it,” he said in a statement.

Still, at least one Catalan civic group said it would respect the court’s ruling. In a statement, the Catalan Civil Society urged local authorities “not to call for confrontation.”

Three other defendants were found guilty merely of disobedience, which means they will be fined but not serve prison time. All 12 defendants were acquitted of the more serious charge of rebellion, but top Catalan officials were given the lengthier sentences.

[Is the Catalan separatist trial in Spain about law or politics?]

Spanish prosecutors initially sought a prison term of 25 years for Oriol Junqueras, Catalonia’s former vice president and the highest-ranking Catalan official on trial. Junqueras was ultimately given a sentence of 13 years, the longest the court handed down.

Following the ruling, Junqueras said Monday that Catalan independence was “closer than ever.” His comments were relayed by his Republic Left party.

“A total of 100 years of prison. How horrible. Now more than ever, we will be with you and your families. For the future of our sons and daughters. For democracy. For Europe. For Catalonia,” said Carles Puigdemont, Catalonia’s former regional president, in a statement on Twitter. Puigdemont fled Spain to Belgium after calling the 2017 referendum.

The ruling looks set to play a role in Spanish elections in early November, the fourth vote the country has held in four years. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, a Socialist, failed to form a government after winning a general election in April, largely because of a standoff with smaller parties on the far left and political center.

Political analysts saw the vote in the context of Spain’s mounting political fragmentation. There are two political parties in the Spanish parliament that support Catalan independence, and it was unclear how the verdict in the Catalan trial would affect the upcoming election.

“It’s either going to get the pro-independence political parties more votes, or people will come to the conclusion that we’ve been through this now, we have a sentence, and they won’t get votes,” said William Chislett, an analyst at the Elcano Royal Institute, a Madrid think tank.

“Which way it’s going to go is anybody’s guess.”

McAuley reported from Paris.

Read more

Fugitive Catalan leader, wanted for rebellion, is running for office by Skype

For some, Catalonia crackdown evokes memories of the dark days of Spain’s dictatorship

Today’s coverage from Post correspondents around the world

Like Washington Post World on Facebook and stay updated on foreign news

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/spanish-supreme-court-sentences-catalan-separatists-to-jail/2019/10/14/a0590366-ee59-11e9-89eb-ec56cd414732_story.html

2019-10-14 09:41:05Z
52780407486080

Queen's Speech opens new session of UK Parliament amid Brexit deadlock: Live updates - CNN

PAUL ELLIS/POOL/AFP/Getty Images
PAUL ELLIS/POOL/AFP/Getty Images

The first and most important piece of legislation announced by the Queen is the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill, which will lay out the plans for Britain’s departure from the EU.

“My government’s priority has always been to secure the United Kingdom’s departure from the European Union on 31 October,” the Queen says, at the start of her speech. “My government intends to work towards a new partnership with the European Union, based on free trade and friendly cooperation.”

Johnson plans to put the bill before MPs next week, once debate on the Queen’s Speech has wrapped up -- but it’s not clear if he’ll get the chance, given that his perilous position in Parliament means he is at risk of losing the vote on his agenda.

Even more pressing is the fact that Johnson is yet to agree any deal with the EU. If he hasn’t done so by the EU summit at the end of this week, he’s mandated by law to request another Brexit extension.

"An immigration bill, ending free movement, will lay the foundation for a fair, modern and global immigration system," the speech adds.

“My Government remains committed to ensuring that resident European citizens, who have built their lives in, and contributed so much to, the United Kingdom, have the right to remain. The bill will include measures that reinforce this commitment,” she added.

“Steps will be taken to provide certainty, stability and new opportunities for the financial services and legal sectors.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/uk/live-news/queens-speech-uk-parliament-dle-intl-gbr/index.html

2019-10-14 10:21:00Z
52780408464678