Sabtu, 05 Oktober 2019

China Loves News About Trump’s Controversies. Not This Time. - The New York Times

BEIJING — Since a trade war broke out with the United States, China’s state-run media has not held back from commenting on the swirl of political controversies around President Trump. At least, not until now.

After Mr. Trump openly urged China on Thursday to investigate former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and his son Hunter, Chinese news media and officials were strikingly muted.

While news of Mr. Trump’s request has seeped onto the Chinese internet, official media have been silent so far and social media mentions have been sparse, suggesting censors are at work. As of Saturday, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs had not publicly responded. Even Global Times, a nationalist Chinese tabloid that is reliably voluble about Mr. Trump, has been quiet.

The lack of response reflects China’s awkward choices as it tries to stand tough against the Trump administration while trying to avoid a spiral of worsening tensions, several experts said.

China’s ties with the Trump administration are volatile. Tit-for-tat tariffs have created a cloud over both economies, and the United States is heading into a presidential election in which China fears it may become a front-burner topic. Relations are especially sensitive at the moment, as top Chinese officials head to Washington in the coming days for the next round of trade talks.

Now Mr. Trump has pushed China into the bonfire of controversies that has prompted Democrats in Congress to initiate an inquiry into his possible impeachment.

“The tag line ‘silence speaks volumes’ is a good one to capture the logic of the likely Chinese response,” said Susan Shirk, who was a deputy assistant secretary of state responsible for China during the Clinton administration and is now chair of the 21st Century China Center at the University of California San Diego.

“Chinese government and media are likely to suppress all discussion in order not to provoke President Trump,” Professor Shirk said by email. China’s leader, Xi Jinping, “is not unusual in working hard to avoid provoking our volatile president and even to try to build some good will with him despite his unpredictability,” she said.

Beijing’s low-key posture may shift in coming days. China is still enjoying its annual National Day holiday, when media and officials are usually slower to respond to news.

The holiday ends after Sunday, and China’s top trade negotiator, Liu He, is expected to travel to Washington for resumed talks starting on Thursday, potentially thrusting him under an unwelcome limelight created by Mr. Trump’s demands for a Chinese inquiry.

Mr. Liu already played an unexpected walk-on role in one of Mr. Trump’s political dramas in February. Mr. Trump chided the United States top trade negotiator, Robert Lighthizer, in front of reporters while Mr. Liu was visiting the Oval Office.

“Undoubtedly, Trump’s request is a very delicate issue for China,” Zhang Jian, a professor at Peking University who teaches about American politics, said in an interview.

“China has its declared stance of not meddling in other countries’ internal affairs, and if it somehow went along with him that would be difficult to explain both at home and abroad.”

Even if China were to look into Hunter Biden’s business dealings, the government would very likely seek to keep any findings to itself, Professor Zhang said. “They’ll want to play this in a very low-key way,” he said.

In Chinese, Mr. Trump’s name is rendered as Te-lang-pu, and on China’s internet he has gained a similar-sounding nickname, Te-mei-pu, a slang phrase meaning “totally unpredictable.” China has experienced Mr. Trump’s changeable ways more than most countries.

As president-elect, Mr. Trump affronted Beijing by holding a telephone call with Tsai Ing-wen, the president of Taiwan, the island-democracy that China claims as its own territory. After he took office, the Chinese government worked energetically to smooth relations. When Mr. Trump visited Beijing in 2017, Mr. Xi courted him in the imperial Forbidden City.

Since then their relations have soured. From last year, the two governments have been locked in disagreement over the Trump administration’s demands that China buy more American goods and pull down protective barriers that foreign businesses say put them at a heavy disadvantage in China. The two sides have been trying to contain the trade tensions, but Mr. Trump has also said that he is in no rush to reach an agreement.

Ties with the United States have also been strained over human rights disputes, including China’s mass detentions of Muslim minorities; accusations of Chinese intelligence operations in the United States; American restrictions on visas for Chinese academics and other visitors, and limits on Chinese companies, especially Huawei; and Chinese anger over the United States’ criticisms of policy in Hong Kong, the semiautonomous city where protesters have raged for months against the city’s Beijing-backed leadership.

China’s calculus in dealing with Mr. Trump has become even more fraught after he demanded that Mr. Xi’s government investigate Mr. Biden, an aspiring Democratic challenger to Mr. Trump in the 2020 presidential election. Mr. Trump already faces a congressional inquiry over his efforts to press Ukraine to investigate the Bidens.

“China should start an investigation into the Bidens, because what happened in China is just about as bad as what happened with Ukraine,” Mr. Trump told reporters. Moments earlier he had commented on the upcoming trade talks with China, and said “if they don’t do what we want, we have tremendous power.”

When asked on Friday if he would be more likely to agree to a trade deal with China if it investigated the Bidens, Mr. Trump said: “One thing has nothing to do with the other.”

Mr. Trump’s demand for an investigation appears to focus on a business venture that involved Mr. Biden’s son, Hunter, and Chinese state-owned financial companies. Mr. Trump suggested that China had channeled $1.5 billion to Hunter Biden in an effort to influence his father.

But the allegation seems to find little, if any, support in the established facts. Mr. Biden and other Democratic contenders for the presidency have denounced Mr. Trump’s comments.

Chinese media have widely reported that Mr. Trump pressed Ukraine to investigate the Bidens, making the silence over his similar call to China more jarring. Before Mr. Trump made his comments pressing China to investigate, the Chinese foreign minister, Wang Yi, had already said his government did not want to become mired in American political strife.

“We’ve never meddled in American domestic affairs, and are confident that the American people can solve their own problems,” Mr. Wang said in a speech in New York in late September, according to Xinhua, the official Chinese news agency. (On Friday, Global Times used its Twitter feed to cite similar words from Mr. Wang, but there was no evidence that he used them after Mr. Trump called for an investigation.)

Beijing has reason to worry that its policies could become a focus for candidates in the coming presidential election, said Bonnie S. Glaser, the director of the China Power Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

American public opinion about China has turned sharply negative, according to findings recently published by the Pew Research Center. The latest opinion survey conducted in spring this year found that 60 percent of American respondents had an unfavorable opinion of China. That was the highest unfavorable level in 15 years of Pew polling of American views of China, and a 13-percentage-point jump in negative opinion compared with views last year.

Mr. Biden has vowed to get tough on China, while also criticizing Mr. Trump’s tariffs on goods made in China as damaging to the American economy and consumers. Other Democratic contenders for the presidential nomination, including Senator Elizabeth Warren, have been more bluntly critical of China’s policies.

“I do think China will be a focus of discussion and debate,” Ms. Glaser said. “Candidates may vie for who can advocate the toughest policy responses.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/05/world/asia/trump-china-biden.html

2019-10-05 08:53:00Z
52780399935508

Here's the latest on the fast-moving impeachment inquiry - CNN

The House committees involved in the impeachment probe issued subpoenas to the White House on Friday evening.
Earlier Friday Trump wouldn't say if his administration would comply with subpoenas. And late on Friday night, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo missed a subpoena deadline from the three committees.
That's as the New York Times reported that there may be a potential second whistleblower. A second intelligence official with concerns and more direct knowledge regarding President Donald Trump's dealings with Ukraine is considering filing a complaint, The New York Times reported Friday

The texts say it all

Don't listen to Trump. Don't listen to Democrats.
We went through the release of Kurt Volker's text messages, line by line, and they pretty clearly show that the phone call where Trump pushed Zelensky for investigations of the Russia investigation and Bidens was not a one-off. It was part of a coordinated campaign.
The political appointees, US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland seemed to realize when career diplomat Bill Taylor texted: "Are we now saying that security assistance and WH meeting are conditioned on investigations?"
Sondland responded: "Call me."

Watch, read, listen

CNN is nearly wall-to-wall on this momentous story on TV. Watch
We are up-to-the minute with the latest on impeachment at CNN.com. Read
David Chalian is podcasting weekdays on the politics of the inquiry. Listen

The Latest

New key player -- Meet Bill Taylor, the official who was nervous about injecting US politics in Ukraine security aid. Full cast of characters
Another big deposition -- Sondland is now expected to testify on Tuesday in front of the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs and Oversight committees.
House gives VP Mike Pence Oct. 15 deadline for docs. LINK
Today's closed-door testimony: The intelligence community inspector general provided documents to the House Intelligence Committee showing efforts to corroborate the whistleblower complaint concerning Trump's pressure on Ukraine. LINK
Jared Kushner and Mick Mulvaney -- The President's adviser/son-in-law and the acting White House chief of staff are now running Trump's impeachment defense. LINK
Rick Perry says he's talked to every major player in this story -- "God as my witness," a Biden never came up, Corruption, yes. Bidens no, he tells CBN. LINK

Trump says he's just fighting corruption. He's not

From CNN's Marshall Cohen -- Trump's latest defense -- that he's just an apolitical anti-corruption crusader -- doesn't hold up under scrutiny. New documents unearthed from the impeachment inquiry, and many of Trump's past comments, undermine his claims that this isn't about Biden or 2020 politics.
Here are just a few reasons:
Trump hasn't publicly raised these issues before with Ukraine.
So far, the supposed anti-corruption campaign is only focused on Biden.
Trump defended his former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, who made millions from Ukraine's corrupt former president.
Trump has praised other world leaders mired by more well-founded corruption scandals, like Russia's Vladimir Putin and Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu.

Volker's side

The messages were provided by Kurt Volker, who was the volunteer special envoy to Ukraine. He's since resigned.
In testimony, Volker told the Impeachment probe that Trump was convinced Ukraine "tried to take me down" in 2016
He argued there was no focus on Biden in the text messages. True, Biden's name does not come up.
But the name of the company that employed his son is all over the place and investigating Burisma is listed as a prerequisite for Trump to meet the Ukrainian President.
Volker portrayed himself as someone trying to divert the influence of Giuliani and get Trump serious about Ukraine, according to CNN's Jeremy Herb.
Jake Tapper reports that Volker is also leaving his full-time role as director of the McCain Institute, which the institute has denied in a statement.

Romney takes a lonely stand with Sasse

Turning on Trump will be a fraught endeavor for any Republican. The lawmakers who have actually done it either didn't seek reelection (Jeff Flake) or left the party (Justin Amash).
Not Mitt Romney. While he didn't exactly endorse impeachment, he did say on Twitter today that he's apalled. And that's something.
Romney: When the only American citizen President Trump singles out for China's investigation is his political opponent in the midst of the Democratic nomination process, it strains credulity to suggest that it is anything other than politically motivated. By all appearances, the President's brazen and unprecedented appeal to China and to Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden is wrong and appalling.
Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska, who sometimes pipes up as a Trump critic, gave a very strong statement to the Omaha World-Herald.
"Americans don't look to Chinese commies for the truth. If the Biden kid broke laws by selling his name to Beijing, that's a matter for American courts, not communist tyrants running torture camps."

GOP positioning

How Republicans ultimately land on Trump's behavior is the ultimate key to his presidency. They have the votes to protect him from impeachment in the Senate, but that assumes the party stays with him. As CNN's Chris Cillizza wrote, the real issue isn't Trump, it's his party.
Cillizza: Trump's behavior -- while hugely unorthodox, erratic and unpresidential -- isn't actually all that surprising. This is who he is -- and is reflective of the sort of campaign he ran for president and how he has acted once in the office. What is surprising, or shocking might be the better word for it, is the fact that Republican elected officials seem willing to not just condone this sort of behavior but even defend it.
Marco Rubio told reporters in Florida he thinks Trump was just kidding around by asking China and Ukraine to investigate Biden.
Ron Johnson, the Wisconsin senator who today contorted himself to admit to the Wall Street Journal that he had directly asked Trump back in August whether he was holding up Ukraine funding to push investigations there. He had heard from Sondland that the aid was tied to an investigation.
Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader, is raising money off the fight, pointing out, probably accurately, that he's standing between Trump and impeachment.
Lindsey Graham is leading the charge to defend Trump and is demanding a House vote to officially begin impeachment proceedings. Pelosi skipped that step.

What do the people want?

CNN's political forecaster, Harry Enten, wrote about all the numbers, but here's the nut of it.
TRUMP -- In an average of polls taken since House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced a formal inquiry last week, 51% support an impeachment inquiry. A minority, 44%, are against it.
CLINTON -- At no point during the impeachment proceedings against Clinton did anywhere close to a plurality of Americans want Clinton impeached and removed from office. Right now, you could argue that we're already at that point with Trump.
NIXON -- The 46% in favor of impeaching and removing Trump now is greater than the 43% who favored it during a similar point in the Nixon impeachment process. It wasn't until right before Nixon resigned that close to a majority wanted him out.

The China side of things

The focus remains on Ukraine, where Trump admits to having pressured Zelensky.
Less clear is where his public call for China to investigate Hunter Biden will lead. Trump is in the midst of high stakes trade talks with China. His top economic adviser, Peter Navarro, got testy when asked about it by CNN's Jim Sciutto.
Navarro said he won't "confirm or deny" whether he "personally" raised investigating Joe Biden or his son during contacts with Chinese officials.
"Me, personally? Now, here's the thing, I will never talk about what happens inside the White House," Navarro said during the contentious exchange which he said was an "interrogation."

What are we doing here?

The President has invited foreign powers to interfere in the US presidential election.
Democrats want to impeach him for it.
It is a crossroads for the American system of government as the President tries to change what's acceptable for US politicians. This newsletter will focus on this consequential moment in US history.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/05/politics/impeachment-tracker-october-4/index.html

2019-10-05 06:26:00Z
52780401566993

Jumat, 04 Oktober 2019

Iraq protests: All the latest updates - Aljazeera.com

Nationwide protests broke out across Iraq on Tuesday, as thousands of mostly young men demonstrated against corruption and calling for an end to endemic corruption in the oil-rich country.

Protesters have also called for improved public services such as electricity and water. 

Security forces have responded using water cannon, tear gas, live rounds and rubber bullets. Dozens of protesters have been killed and hundreds more wounded. 

Tensions have been exacerbated by a near-total internet blackout as the authorities seek to prevent protesters communicating with each other or posting footage of the chaotic demonstrations.

The mostly leaderless demonstrations are the biggest challenge yet to the one-year government of Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi, who has imposed curfews in Baghdad and other cities to try to stop the protests gathering steam.

Here are the latest updates from Iraq:

Friday, October 4

UN urges Iraq to probe protest deaths 'transparently'

The United Nations called on Iraq to rapidly and transparently investigate force used by anti-riot police in clashes with protesters that have left dozens dead.

"We call on the Iraqi government to allow people to freely exercise their rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly," Marta Hurtado, spokeswoman for the UN rights office, told journalists in Geneva.

"We are worried by reports that security forces have used live ammunition and rubber bullets in some areas, and have also fired tear gas cannisters directly at protestors," Hurtado said, insisting that in dealing with demonstrations, "the use of force should be exceptional".

"Any use of force must comply with applicable international human rights norms and standards," she said, stressing that firearms should never be used "except as a last resort to protect against an imminent threat of death or serious injury."

"All incidents in which the actions of security forces have resulted in death and injury should be promptly, independently and transparently investigated," she said.

Iraq's Grand Ayatollah backs protests

Iraq's top Shia cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani urged security forces and protesters not to use violence, and criticised Iraqi leaders for failing to eradicate corruption

He has called on the Iraqi government to heed the protesters' demands "before it is too late".

In a letter read out by his representative Ahmed al-Safi during a sermon in the holy city of Kerbala, Sistani described the deaths from the protests as "sorrowful", and maintained that the government has not "achieved anything on the ground".

"Lawmakers hold the biggest responsibility for what is happening," Sistani said.  

He also said the government "must do what it can to improve public services, find work for the unemployed, end clientelism, deal with the corruption issue and send those implicated in it to prison".

Red Cross calls for restraint as protests continue

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) said it was concerned by "increasingly violent clashes" between protesters and security forces.

"The use of force by security forces must be proportionate to the situation and is an exceptional measure," said the ICRC's head of delegation in Iraq, Katharina Ritz.

"In particular, firearms and live ammunition must only be used as a last resort, and to protect against an imminent threat to life."

Death toll rises to 44: police, security sources 

The death toll from three days of anti-government protests in Iraq climbed to 44, police and medical sources told Reuters.

Iraqi security forces fire on protesters in Baghdad

The largest number of casualties occurred in the southern city of Nasiriya, where 18 people were killed, followed by the capital Baghdad where the death toll stood at 16, they said.

The protests, in which hundreds of people have also been injured, began over unemployment and poor services but have escalated into calls for a change of government and pose one of the country's biggest security challenges in years.

Qatar urges citizens not to travel to Iraq 

Qatar's foreign ministry advised its citizens on Friday not to travel to Iraq and urged those already there to leave immediately in view of ongoing unrest.

Iraqi security forces open fire on protesters in Baghdad

Iraqi security forces opened fired on dozens of protesters gathering in Baghdad on Friday for a fourth day of demonstrations against corruption, unemployment and poor public services.

"These protesters have now been dispersed to neighbouring streets and there are running battles taking place," said Al Jazeera's Imran Khan, reporting from Baghdad.

Iraqi Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi said there was "no magic solution" to Iraq's problems but pledged to work on laws granting poor families a basic income, provide alternative housing, and fight corruption.

Read more here.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/10/iraq-protests-latest-updates-191004085506824.html

2019-10-04 11:19:00Z
52780400196961

Ukraine top prosecutor says Biden-linked Burisma case will be reviewed - Fox News

Ukraine’s top prosecutor said Friday that his office is "conducting an audit" of cases that have been previously investigated and closed, including the probe involving the energy giant Burisma, where Hunter Biden had served on the board.

Ruslan Ryaboshapka, the country's prosecutor general, said at a news conference that his office was instructed to review cases that have been closed, fragmented or investigated to make sure they were fairly and thoroughly handled. He said no one attempted to influence him to call for the new investigations.

DOCUMENTS HEIGHTEN SCRUTINY ON BIDEN-UKRAINE DEALINGS, INDICATE HUNTER MAY HAVE MADE 'MILLIONS'

“We are now reviewing all the cases which were closed, fragmented or investigated earlier in order to make a decision on cases where illegal procedural decisions were taken,” he said.

The office plans to review 15 cases that previously were closed, including the Burisma case. This does not yet mean Ukraine is opening a new investigation involving Burisma or the Bidens.

His comment came as the Trump White House fights an impeachment inquiry that involves allegations that President Trump used military funding as part of a "quid pro quo" with Kiev to investigate Biden and his father, former Vice President Joe Biden.

Trump has denied wrongdoing. Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky, who participated in a scrutinized phone call with Trump in July, said he never felt pressure from Trump.

Trump's key focus has been how Hunter Biden, who reportedly knew little about the energy business and the country, ended up on Burisma’s board while his father was vice president under Barack Obama. The elder Biden later pressured Ukraine to oust a prosecutor who had been looking into the company's founder, though Biden allies say this intervention was driven by corruption concerns.

CLICK HERE FOR THE ALL-NEW FOXBUSINESS.COM

It is unclear how much money Hunter Biden made while serving on the board of the firm, but reports have estimated he made up to $50,000 per month — which would be up to $600,000 a year.

Fox News has also obtained notes from an interview Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani conducted—with Yuriy Lutsenko, the former Ukrainian prosecutor who replaced Shokin and eventually closed the Burisma probe. He said he “believes Hunter Biden receives millions of dollars in compensation from Burisma,” according to the notes.

Fox News reported Wednesday on notes from another interview Giuliani conducted with Viktor Shokin, the prosecutor Biden helped oust, in which he claimed he was told by former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey R. Pyatt to back off the Burisma probe. According to interview notes, Shokin claimed Pyatt – currently the ambassador to Greece – told him to handle that investigation “with white gloves.”

Biden has acknowledged on camera that when he was vice president he successfully pressured Ukraine to fire Shokin.

The vice president threatened to withhold $1 billion in critical U.S. aid if Shokin was not fired.

"Well, son of a b---h, he got fired," Biden joked at a panel two years after leaving office.

But Biden's campaign and congressional Democrats reject Giuliani's allegations and suggestions that his intervention  was tied to his son's work, maintaining that Biden was only involved due to corruption concerns surrounding Shokin and casting Giuliani's claims as "debunked conspiracy theories."

Ryaboshapka is considered a reformer and “the father of the anti-corruption strategy in Ukraine,” a former associate told the Washington Post. Another peer called him an “honest person” but expressed doubts that he has the ability to weed out corruption in the country.

"Being a good guy is not always enough," the source said.

Fox News' NaNa Sajaia, Griff Jenkins, Brooke Singman and Gregg Re contributed to this report. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ukraine-top-prosecutor-says-hunter-biden-burisma-cases-will-be-reviewed

2019-10-04 10:28:44Z
52780399935508

Hong Kong anti-mask law: a history of mask bans around the world - Quartz

The Hong Kong government today (Oct. 4) invoked emergency powers to enact a ban on wearing face masks in public, even as critics decried the move as setting a dangerous precedent and jeopardizing the city’s protection of civil liberties.

It’s not the first place in the world to impose such a ban, and other countries have similar restrictions. France imposed a ban on face coverings in 2010, as did Belgium and the Catalonia region of Spain. Italy followed suit in 2011. Earlier this year, France imposed a ban on masks at public demonstrations, amid the months-long Yellow Vest protests. Many other countries have similar rules, including Australia, Austria, Bulgaria, Egypt, Germany, and the Netherlands. Ukraine’s anti-protest law of 2014, which was hurriedly enacted and included a ban on wearing masks, was meant to crack down on protesters but instead sparked an angry outcry that quickly grew into violent clashes.

The US, meanwhile, goes back much further to the mid-19th century, when an anti-mask law was enacted in New York state in an attempt to quell a violent uprising by tenant farmers. The law was cited by New York police (paywall) when they made arrests of Occupy protesters in 2011.

A masked anti-government protester is pictured in Central Hong Kong, China October 4, 2019.
A masked anti-government protester in the city’s downtown on Friday.

Supporters of Hong Kong’s mask ban point to these countries as examples. But pro-democracy lawmaker Dennis Kwok has dismissed comparisons to similar face-mask bans in countries like the US and Canada, emphasizing that those are fully-fledged democracies while neither the legislative nor the executive branch in Hong Kong is accountable to the people.

People also cite Ukrainians’ reaction to the country’s strict anti-protest laws as a cautionary tale. In local online forums, Hong Kongers have been sharing a speech made by jailed activist Edward Leung, who has become something of a spiritual leader of the city’s protesters. During his 2016 election campaign for the legislature, he cautioned against an anti-mask law. “A few years ago, Ukraine passed an anti-mask law. Do you know what happened in Ukraine? A revolution started in Ukraine. You want to do it? Do it, we will fight till the end,” he said.

A gas mask and flowers are seen at the site of the recent clashes in Kiev March 30, 2014.

Reuters/Gleb Garanich

A gas mask and flowers were left in 2014 at the protest site in Kyiv where more than 100 people were killed.

At its core, face mask bans pose a question about power: who gets to wield it, and who gets to place limits on it. The masked person can look but not be seen—an enormous and liberating power particularly in today’s age of surveillance. For the state and those in authority, the mask represents a threat because their power is in part drawn from knowing exactly who you are.

For many in Hong Kong, the face mask ban is a reminder of the asymmetrical balance of power that they are protesting so hard against. While citizens are now prohibited from wearing masks in public assemblies, police officers will continue to be able to conceal their identities: many have refused to wear or produce their warrant cards, and have put strips of reflective tape on their visors to further hide their faces.

Writing in his book Man, Play and Games, the 20th-century French intellectual Roger Caillois observed the diametrical opposition between the mask and the uniform:

In a police state, the uniform replaces the mask of a vertiginous society. The uniform is almost the exact opposite of the mask, and always symbolizes a type of authority founded on entirely opposing principles. The mask aimed to dissimulate and terrify. It signified the eruption of a fearful, capricious, intermittent, and inordinate power, which emerged to evoke pious terror in the profane masses and to punish them for their imprudence and their faults. The uniform is also a disguise, but it is official, permanent, regulated, and, above all, leaves the face exposed.

The only difference in Hong Kong’s case, of course, is that even the uniformed individual is masked.

For now, anger runs high in Hong Kong. Protests spontaneously popped up across the city before and immediately after the official announcement of the ban, and there are calls for a large, masked rally on Sunday (Oct. 6) in full defiance of the new law.

Their faith in the mask as a counterweight to state power finds echoes in a series of large-scale anti-capitalism demonstrations that took place around the world in June 1999. One unnamed, masked activist who took part in a protest in London had this to say:  “Today we shall give this resistance a face; for by putting on our masks we reveal our unity; and by raising our voices in the street together, we speak our anger at the facelessness of power.”

A fine arts student wears make-up during the Catrina's parade in Guadalajara October 26, 2012. Students of fine arts took part in their Catrina's parade as part of the celebrations for the Day of the Dead, local media reported. La Catrina, a popular figure in Mexico known as "The Elegant Skull".

Reuters/Alejandro Acosta

Does heavy make-up count as a mask? Above, a student in Guadalajara, Mexico, celebrates the Day of the Dead.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://qz.com/1721901/hong-kong-anti-mask-law-a-history-of-mask-bans-around-the-world/

2019-10-04 09:57:00Z
52780400882835

Hong Kong introduces emergency powers to ban face masks at protests - NBC News

Hong Kong will ban face masks at public demonstrations as part of emergency powers announced Friday, as sometimes violent pro-democracy protests continue in the semiautonomous territory.

Carrie Lam, the city's Beijing-backed leader, told a press conference that the the ban on face masks, which are worn by many protesters to hide their identities, would come into effect at midnight local time.

"We've seen that almost all protesters who carried out vandalism and violence covered their face," Lam told reporters.

"We believe the prohibition on face covering regulation will be an effective deterrent to radical behavior and it will also help the police in enforcing the law,” she added.

If convicted, demonstrators could face a maximum fine of some 25,000 Hong Kong dollars ($3,187) and a year imprisonment, the Hong Kong information services department said in a statement.

If they refuse to comply with police to remove the face covering, a demonstrator could face a fine of up to 10,000 Hong Kong dollars ($1,275) and imprisonment for six months, the statement said.

Reasonable excuses for a person to cover their face include pre-existing medical or health reasons, religious or professional reasons, it added.

Before the new rule was confirmed, protests against it began across the Asian financial hub, with hundreds of office workers wearing masks gathering to march.

A protester wears a gas mask and holds up his hand to represent the five demands in Hong Kong on Friday.Vincent Thian / AP

Protesters in Hong Kong’s Central district pulled down a banner celebrating the 70th anniversary of the People’s Republic of China from a bridge and set it on fire to the sound of cheers from onlookers.

Some demonstrators, chanted “rebel Hong Kong people” and “masking is not guilty, unreasonable legislation.”

Secondary school students wearing school uniforms could be seen among the throngs of people.

Lam said she was concerned by the number of students involved in recent demonstrations. From June to August, students accounted for around 25 percent of those arrested, she said, but since the start of school in September the proportion has now risen to 38 percent.

She said she hoped the ban would discourage young people from taking to the streets.

But young Hong Kongers who spoke to NBC News said they would continue to protest and cover their faces.

Aki Chi, a 29-year-old sound actor who was headed to a demonstration in the city's Central district, said he “absolutely” would not comply with the new ban.

“I have no intention to respect it,” he told NBC News.

Jane Chiu, 23, said the ban allowed the police more power on the streets and proved the government was attempting to suppress the voices of its citizens.

“This is authoritarianism, welcome to just another Chinese city,” she said.

The H.R. worker added that she also would not stop wearing masks to protests.

“If we allow this to happen, we are just opening our doors to any other possible regulations in the future."

Many people in Hong Kong wear masks on a daily basis to protect themselves from colds and flu. Lam said she had taken this into account.

"The regulation will target those who use violence, we understand there may be other people who need to wear a mask or cover their face because of a legitimate need," she said.

However, it remained unclear how the government planned to enforce the ban or how straightforward it would be to evaluate "legitimate" use.

Lam stressed that the new regulation did not mean that Hong Kong was in a state of emergency but said it was experiencing a moment of "rather extensive and serious public danger."

"I hope the public will support and understand what we're doing," she said.

Many do not. Prominent activist Joshua Wong tweeted that Friday's announcement could lead to further powers, such as arbitrary arrest.

"I strongly urge the international community to be aware of the de-facto martial law may be applied in Hong Kong soon, in the next few hours or in the next few days," Wong later told reporters.

Anti-government protests have gripped the former British colony for months, plunging it into its biggest political crisis in decades and posing a popular challenge to Chinese President Xi Jinping.

The protesters are angry about what they see as creeping interference by Beijing in their city's affairs despite a promise of autonomy in the "one country, two systems" formula under which Hong Kong returned to China in 1997.

China dismisses accusations it is meddling and has accused foreign governments, including the United States and Britain, of stirring up anti-China sentiment.

Lam said Friday that so far some 1,100 people had been injured and of them around 300 were police officers in the violence.

What began as opposition to a proposed extradition law, which could have seen people sent for trial in mainland courts but has now been shelved, has grown into a call for five demands, including universal suffrage and an inquiry into alleged police brutality.

Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam attends a news conference to discuss sweeping emergency laws at government office in Hong Kong on Friday.ATHIT PERAWONGMETHA / Reuters

Protesters, some wearing gas masks and helmets, marched past some of the city's most expensive real estate including British bank HSBC's head office, on Friday, calling out for "five demands, not one less".

Riot police moved in to districts across Hong Kong overnight, firing tear gas at a chanting crowd in a residential area, while rail operator MTR Corp shut several stations as violence escalated.

The protests have been inflamed by the police shooting of a teenage secondary school student on Tuesday during a clash, and more rallies are expected later in the evening and over the weekend.

Police said the officer involved in the shooting acted in self-defense because his life was under threat. The teenager, the first protester hit by live fire during months of unrest, remains in hospital in a stable condition.

Lam said Friday that escalating violence, use of lethal weapons and snatching of police pistols meant police have "no choice but to use guns to try to save their own lives."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/hong-kong-introduces-emergency-powers-ban-face-masks-protests-n1062301

2019-10-04 09:37:00Z
52780400882835

Hong Kong introduces emergency powers to ban face masks at protests - NBC News

Hong Kong will ban face masks at public demonstrations as part of emergency powers announced Friday, as sometimes violent pro-democracy protests continue in the semiautonomous territory.

Carrie Lam, the city's Beijing-backed leader, told a press conference that the the ban on face masks, which are worn by many protesters to hide their identities, would come into effect at midnight local time.

"We've seen that almost all protesters who carried out vandalism and violence covered their face," Lam told reporters.

"We believe the prohibition on face covering regulation will be an effective deterrent to radical behavior and it will also help the police in enforcing the law,” she added.

If convicted, demonstrators could face a maximum fine of some 25,000 Hong Kong dollars ($3,187) and a year imprisonment, the Hong Kong information services department said in a statement.

If they refuse to comply with police to remove the face covering, a demonstrator could face a fine of up to 10,000 Hong Kong dollars ($1,275) and imprisonment for six months, the statement said.

Reasonable excuses for a person to cover their face include pre-existing medical or health reasons, religious or professional reasons, it added.

Before the new rule was confirmed, protests against it began across the Asian financial hub, with hundreds of office workers wearing masks gathering to march.

A protester wears a gas mask and holds up his hand to represent the five demands in Hong Kong on Friday.Vincent Thian / AP

"After so many months the government has refused to answer our demands," said one protester, who asked to be identified as just Chan, at a demonstration in the city's Central district.

"Police brutality is becoming more serious and the set up of an anti-mask law is to threaten us from protesting," said the 27-year-old financial industry worker.

Many people in Hong Kong wear masks on a daily basis to protect themselves from colds and flu. Lam said she had taken this into account.

"The regulation will target those who use violence, we understand there may be other people who need wear a mask or cover their face because of a legitimate need," she said.

However, it remained unclear how the government planned to enforce the ban or how straightforward it would be to evaluate "legitimate" use.

Lam stressed that the new regulation did not mean that Hong Kong was in a state of emergency but hoped that the public would understand the need for the ban.

"I hope the public will support and understand what we're doing," she said.

Many do not. Prominent activist Joshua Wong tweeted that Friday's announcement could lead to further powers, such as arbitrary arrest.

"I strongly urge the international community to be aware of the de-facto martial law may be applied in Hong Kong soon, in the next few hours or in the next few days," Wong later told reporters.

Anti-government protests have gripped the former British colony for months, plunging it into its biggest political crisis in decades and posing a popular challenge to Chinese President Xi Jinping.

The protesters are angry about what they see as creeping interference by Beijing in their city's affairs despite a promise of autonomy in the "one country, two systems" formula under which Hong Kong returned to China in 1997.

China dismisses accusations it is meddling and has accused foreign governments, including the United States and Britain, of stirring up anti-China sentiment.

Lam said Friday that so far some 1,100 people had been injured and of them around 300 were police officers.

What began as opposition to a proposed extradition law, which that could have seen people sent for trial in mainland courts but has now been shelved, has grown into a call for five demands, including universal suffrage and an inquiry into alleged police brutality.

Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam attends a news conference to discuss sweeping emergency laws at government office in Hong Kong on Friday.ATHIT PERAWONGMETHA / Reuters

Protesters, some wearing gas masks and helmets, marched past some of the city's most expensive real estate including British bank HSBC's head office, on Friday, calling out for "five demands, not one less".

The protests have been inflamed by the police shooting of a teenaged secondary school student on Tuesday during a clash, and more rallies are expected later in the evening and over the weekend.

Police said the officer involved in the shooting acted in self-defense because his life was under threat. The teenager, the first protester hit by live fire during months of unrest, remains in hospital in a stable condition.

Lam said Thursday that escalating violence, use of lethal weapons and snatching of police pistols meant police have "no choice but to use guns to try to save their own lives."

Riot police moved in to districts across Hong Kong overnight, firing tear gas at a chanting crowd in a residential area, while rail operator MTR Corp shut several stations as violence escalated.

Ed Flanagan contributed.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/hong-kong-introduces-emergency-powers-ban-face-masks-protests-n1062301

2019-10-04 08:49:00Z
52780400882835