Jumat, 20 September 2019

Taiwan says China lures Kiribati with airplanes after losing another ally - Reuters

TAIPEI (Reuters) - China offered airplanes and ferries to lure the Pacific island nation of Kiribati into switching diplomatic relations, Taiwan said on Friday, as the self-ruled island lost another ally to Chinese pressure.

Taiwan Foreign Minister Joseph Wu speaks at a news conference announcing Taiwan's decision to terminate diplomatic ties with the Pacific island nation of Kiribati, in Taipei, Taiwan September 20, 2019. REUTERS/I-Hwa Cheng

The switch, just days after the Solomon Islands cut ties with Taiwan, deals a fresh blow to President Tsai Ing-wen, who is seeking re-election in January, as it takes to seven the tally of allies lost to China since she took office in 2016.

Taiwan has terminated diplomatic ties with Kiribati and will immediately shut its embassy there, Foreign Minister Joseph Wu told reporters in Taipei.

“According to information obtained by Taiwan, the Chinese government has already promised to provide full funds for the procurement of several airplanes and commercial ferries, thus luring Kiribati into switching diplomatic relations,” he added.

China was trying to “suppress and reduce Taiwan’s international presence” and “ultimately destroy Taiwan’s sovereignty,” Wu said.

“It is blatantly obvious that the Chinese government, by creating these diplomatic incidents, seeks to manipulate public opinion in Taiwan, influence Taiwan’s upcoming presidential and legislative elections, and undermine its democratic processes.”

The Kiribati president’s office and China’s foreign ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

China claims Taiwan as its territory, and says the democratic island has no right to formal ties with any country.

Since Tsai took office, China has stepped up pressure on Taiwan, by flying regular bomber patrols around the island, for example. China suspects Tsai of pushing for Taiwan’s formal independence, a red line for Beijing.

Aid requested by Kiribati from Beijing includes loans and a Boeing 737 aircraft, said a senior official in Taiwan with direct knowledge of the matter who sought anonymity.

Citing intelligence gathered by Taipei, the source said China aimed to peel away more of Taiwan’s allies before the 70th anniversary of the founding of Communist China on Oct. 1.

“That worries several countries in the region, including the United States and Australia,” said the official, citing fears over China’s growing influence on the so-called “second island chain” in the Pacific.

Kiribati is the seventh country to drop Taiwan as a diplomatic ally since 2016, following Burkina Faso, the Dominican Republic, Sao Tome and Principe, Panama, El Salvador and the Solomon Islands.

In a statement, Taiwan’s main opposition, the China-friendly Kuomintang party, urged Tsai’s ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to review its policy toward Beijing.

“The DPP should examine the real cause behind the breaking of ties and propose a practical solution,” it said.

“It should not continue to shift the responsibility to the former ally, the mainland authorities or the opposition party.”

FILE PHOTO: Lagoons can be seen from a plane as it flies above Kiritimati Island, part of the Pacific Island nation of Kiribati, April 5, 2016. REUTERS/Lincoln Feast/File Photo

Taiwan now has formal relations with just 15 countries.

“With the breaking of ties, China is forcing Taiwan to accept ‘one country two systems,’” said Yun-kung Ting, a spokesman for Taiwan’s presidential office, referring to an arrangement similar to that of Asian financial hub Hong Kong, which guarantees certain freedoms to the Chinese-ruled city.

“The more Taiwan shows that it’s not being intimidated, the more it frustrates China’s scheme,” Ting said.

Reporting by Yimou Lee in TAIPEI; Additional reporting by Ben Blanchard in BEIJING, Jonathan Barrett in SYDNEY and Tom Westbrook in SINGAPORE; Editing by Neil Fullick and Clarence Fernandez

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-taiwan-diplomacy-kiribati/taiwan-cuts-ties-with-kiribati-amid-china-tension-idUSKBN1W50DI

2019-09-20 05:06:00Z
CAIiEEWQ7XhrxGz3KGHbmFJ3LEgqFQgEKg0IACoGCAowt6AMMLAmMJSCDg

Kamis, 19 September 2019

Boris Johnson's Parliament suspension case reaches final day in Supreme Court: Live updates - CNN International

The court has been hearing from Ronan Lavery QC, who is speaking on behalf of Northern Ireland victims campaigner Raymond McCord -- but it's safe to say that Lavery has had something of a nightmare.

Lavery spent most of his time talking about the effects of a no-deal Brexit on Northern Ireland -- which is decidedly not what the hearing is about.

At one point Lady Hale, the court's President, interrupted in a somewhat exasperated tone.

“We're not concerned with any of that,” she says. "We are concerned with the lawfulness of the decision to prorogue Parliament for five weeks," she added, rather than Brexit, and what form it would take.

That same criticism has been picked up by a number of judges, too. "The purpose of this hearing is not to rehearse the pros and cons of Brexit," one tells Lavery.

"I'm really worried about your submissions - so many people are listening to you ... and may come to entirely the wrong conclusion" about the purpose of the hearing, Lord Wilson added.

"Don't abuse our politeness, and don't abuse Lady Hale's patience."

Ouch.

Lavery had told the court that “the rising tide of nationalism that we’re witnessing is poisoning the harmony of the EU states” and directly affecting Northern Ireland's ability to function.

He then urged the judges to look at the current legal question “in a way that recognizes the impact" on Northern Ireland, and adds that the erection of a hard border in Northern Ireland after a no-deal Brexit would be "devastating."

But it doesn't appear that his remarks will have much of an impact on the case.

Some context: McCord's 22-year-old son was murdered by the UVF, a loyalist paramilitary group, in Belfast in 1997. He took the government to court on the grounds that its Brexit strategy could undermine the Good Friday agreement, and lost his case, but his team was invited to make an intervention at this hearing as well.

“Many victims of the conflict in Northern Ireland are still seeking justice,” Lavery told the judges.

“My client is comfortable with his identity he has a British passport and an Irish passport” and “he believes that in this court there is commonality of purpose to determine what the rule of law is and how it should be applied,” the lawyer added.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://edition.cnn.com/uk/live-news/boris-johnson-supreme-court-thursday-dle-gbr-intl/index.html

2019-09-19 12:47:00Z
52780386775606

Boris Johnson's Parliament suspension case reaches final day in Supreme Court: Live updates - CNN International

John Major.
John Major. Jack Taylor/Getty Images

Thursday's busy Supreme Court schedule will include a remarkable and unprecedented sight: that of a former British Prime Minister making a case against the incumbent in the country's highest court.

John Major will be represented by a lawyer and will not be speaking himself. But he has already submitted a written case to the court that accuses Boris Johnson of shutting down Parliament to stop lawmakers from interfering with the Prime Minister's Brexit strategy.

Major himself controversially prorogued Parliament for three weeks in the run-up to the 1997 general election, a move critics claimed was motivated by his desire to stop the publication of a report about Conservative MPs accepting bribes.

Here's a few key lines from Major's submission.

On Johnson's motive for suspending Parliament: "The decision was in fact substantially motivated by a desire to obstruct Parliament from interfering with the Prime Minister’s plans," Major's submission reads. Elsewhere, Major argues: "Somewhat strikingly, it remains genuinely unclear whether the Defendant disputes that proposition."

On the government refusing to submit any witness statements: "It would be very straightforward for the Prime Minister or a senior official to sign a witness statement confirming (for example) that the decision had nothing to do with Brexit if that were indeed the case, and despite repeated requests nobody has been prepared to do so," reads Major's submission.

On whether prorogation is a political matter, or one for the courts to consider: "In modern times the power of prorogation is not in any sense a matter of “high policy," Major's submission argues. "Indeed, in the vast majority of cases the decision to prorogue Parliament has no political content at all. The routine and regular prorogations of the last few decades are plainly not so politically sensitive that it would be wrong for the Court even to begin to examine them."

On Boris Johnson implying he might try to ignore a law instructing him to seek a Brexit extension if he can't secure a deal: "In circumstances where, for example, Parliament has passed an Act requiring the Prime Minister to seek an extension of the Article 50 deadline if certain conditions are met, and the Prime Minister is on record saying that he will never in any circumstances seek such an extension, it is all the more necessary that any legal analysis must have regard to the possibility of “extreme” scenarios as well as ordinary and uncontroversial ones."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://edition.cnn.com/uk/live-news/boris-johnson-supreme-court-thursday-dle-gbr-intl/index.html

2019-09-19 10:23:00Z
52780386775606

Boris Johnson's Parliament suspension case reaches final day in Supreme Court: Live updates - CNN International

John Major.
John Major. Jack Taylor/Getty Images

Thursday's busy Supreme Court schedule will include a remarkable and unprecedented sight: that of a former British Prime Minister making a case against the incumbent in the country's highest court.

John Major will be represented by a lawyer and will not be speaking himself. But he has already submitted a written case to the court that accuses Boris Johnson of shutting down Parliament to stop lawmakers from interfering with the Prime Minister's Brexit strategy.

Major himself controversially prorogued Parliament for three weeks in the run-up to the 1997 general election, a move critics claimed was motivated by his desire to stop the publication of a report about Conservative MPs accepting bribes.

Here's a few key lines from Major's submission.

On Johnson's motive for suspending Parliament: "The decision was in fact substantially motivated by a desire to obstruct Parliament from interfering with the Prime Minister’s plans," Major's submission reads. Elsewhere, Major argues: "Somewhat strikingly, it remains genuinely unclear whether the Defendant disputes that proposition."

On the government refusing to submit any witness statements: "It would be very straightforward for the Prime Minister or a senior official to sign a witness statement confirming (for example) that the decision had nothing to do with Brexit if that were indeed the case, and despite repeated requests nobody has been prepared to do so," reads Major's submission.

On whether prorogation is a political matter, or one for the courts to consider: "In modern times the power of prorogation is not in any sense a matter of “high policy," Major's submission argues. "Indeed, in the vast majority of cases the decision to prorogue Parliament has no political content at all. The routine and regular prorogations of the last few decades are plainly not so politically sensitive that it would be wrong for the Court even to begin to examine them."

On Boris Johnson implying he might try to ignore a law instructing him to seek a Brexit extension if he can't secure a deal: "In circumstances where, for example, Parliament has passed an Act requiring the Prime Minister to seek an extension of the Article 50 deadline if certain conditions are met, and the Prime Minister is on record saying that he will never in any circumstances seek such an extension, it is all the more necessary that any legal analysis must have regard to the possibility of “extreme” scenarios as well as ordinary and uncontroversial ones."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://edition.cnn.com/uk/live-news/boris-johnson-supreme-court-thursday-dle-gbr-intl/index.html

2019-09-19 09:32:00Z
52780386775606

US supports Saudi 'right to defend itself': Pompeo - Al Jazeera English

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has backed Saudi Arabia's "right to defend itself" and said that Iran's behaviour would "not be tolerated", in a meeting with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), according to a statement on his official Twitter account on Thursday.

Pompeo again condemned the weekend attack on Saudi oil fields that knocked out half of the country's oil production. The US top envoy has also supported the Saudi call for international experts to travel to the country to investigate, the Saudi news agency SPA said in a separate statement.

In the meeting, MBS told Pompeo the attacks on state oil company Saudi Aramco were aimed at destabilising security in the region and damaging the global supply of energy.

Speaking to reporters on his way to Jeddah, Pompeo had described the raids on key oil installations as an "act of war" and reiterated that it was an "Iranian attack". 

Iran has repeatedly denied it was behind the attacks that have heightened tensions in the region.

Yemen's Houthi rebels, who have been locked in a war with a Saudi-UAE-led coalition since 2015, has claimed responsibility for the attacks, warning Riyadh that their targets "will keep expanding".

But Saudi and US officials have said that evidence shows Iranian involvement.

Just before Pompeo's comments, Saudi military officials held a news conference and showed debris from the alleged weapons used during the attacks, saying there was "undeniable" evidence of Iranian aggression.

A defence ministry spokesman said there was no way the attacks could have been launched from Yemen. 

"The attack was launched from the north and unquestionably sponsored by Iran," Saudi Colonel Turki al-Malki said. "We are working to know the exact launch point." 

Al-Malki did not directly blame Iran for the attack when asked by journalists. He said once "the culprits" were identified they would "be held accountable".

Saudi oil attacks

Saudi defence ministry spokesman Colonel Turki Al-Malik displays on a screen drones which the Saudi government says attacked an Aramco oil facility [Hamad I Mohammed/Reuters] 

Trump and Saudi officials have stressed the need for caution in their response to the attacks. The US president has said he does not want war and is coordinating with the Gulf and European states.

Hillary Mann Leverett, chief executive of political risk consultancy Stratega and a former US diplomat, told Al Jazeera the Saudis use of the word "sponsorship" indicated a certain level of caution amid its current diplomatic isolation.

"They have no guarantee the US will back them up to retaliate against Iran or anyone else," she said. "They are in a really tough position with very few options. They are trying to lay out what evidence they can but there is a lot of doubt here in Washington, and I think around the world, about what the Saudis have to say given their record with Yemen, the Khashoggi killing and other issues."

Earlier on Wednesday, Trump said he ordered a major increase in sanctions on Iran, but gave no details. 

It is not clear yet what Pompeo's comments mean for the US response to the attacks.

US media, citing unnamed US officials, reported on Tuesday that evidence showed Saturday's attacks originated in southwestern Iran.

Three officials said they involved cruise missiles and drones, indicating a higher degree of complexity and sophistication than initially thought. The US has not made its evidence public.

The officials also did not provide evidence or explain what US intelligence they were using for evaluating the attack, which cut five percent of the world's oil production.

The new violence has led to fears that further action on any side could rapidly escalate a confrontation that has been raging just below the surface in the wider region in recent months. 

In June, Trump called off a military attack on Iran at the last minute after Tehran shot down an unmanned US military drone. Iran maintains the drone was in Iranian airspace. The US says it was in international territory.

Those tensions have been boiling since Trump pulled the US out of the 2015 nuclear agreement that curtailed Tehran's nuclear activities, and reimposed sanctions that sent Iran's economy into a tailspin.

SOURCE: Al Jazeera and news agencies

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/09/supports-saudi-defend-pompeo-190919014947414.html

2019-09-19 06:42:00Z
52780382632806

Rabu, 18 September 2019

Israel election: Netanyahu and rival Gantz headed for deadlock - BBC News

No clear winner has emerged from Israel's election, leaving a question mark over who will be prime minister, partial official results confirm.

With about 60% of votes counted, the party of incumbent Benjamin Netanyahu is neck and neck with that of his centre-left main challenger.

The results indicate that each will struggle to form a majority coalition with smaller parties.

Mr Netanyahu is vying to stay in power for a record fifth term.

The latest results from Tuesday's vote suggest his Likud party won 31 seats, while his opponent Benny Gantz's Blue and White party garnered 32 seats, the Kan public broadcaster says.

A prime minister needs to command a 61-seat majority in the Knesset (parliament).

Mr Netanyahu, Israel's longest-serving prime minister, has been in office for 10 years.

The 69 year old has pledged to annex Jewish settlements and a swathe of other territory in the occupied West Bank if he is returned to power.

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Palestinians, who seek a state in the West Bank and Gaza, with its capital in occupied East Jerusalem, have warned such a move will kill any hopes for peace.

Mr Gantz has not advocated any form of annexation, though his position on the creation of a Palestinian state is unclear. Like Mr Netanyahu, he has ruled out ever dividing Jerusalem.

What are the latest results?

Official results have been slow to be released, with only 60% of votes counted by 12:53 (09:53 GMT).

They put Blue and White slightly ahead of Likud, with an alliance of Arab parties third, the ultra-Orthodox Shas party fourth and Yisrael Beiteinu, a nationalist party, in fifth place. The tally does not say how this translates into seats in the Knesset.

Based on these reported results, neither leader can form a majority coalition without support from Yisrael Beiteinu.

That party's leader, Avigdor Lieberman, reiterated that he would only support a government comprising both Likud and Blue and White. However, Blue and White has ruled out sitting with Mr Netanyahu in a coalition.

Exit polls earlier presented a similar picture.

Netanyahu weakened

Analysis by Tom Bateman, BBC Middle East correspondent, Jerusalem

The prime minister is well short of being able to form a governing bloc of right-wing and religious parties that are prepared to sit with him. In fact the result leaves him in an even weaker position than he was after April's vote.

It's almost impossible to predict the outcome, with frenetic horse trading on the way and even the chance of parties fragmenting or politicians shifting allegiances. But as it stands, three broad themes seem among the possibilities:

  • A dominant new governing bloc of the two big rival parties: Likud with Blue and White. This only seems possible without Mr Netanyahu as Likud leader. Needless to say that's a deal breaker for him and, so far at least, for his party
  • Mr Netanyahu's political rival Avigdor Lieberman miraculously changes his mind and agrees to join a right-wing and religious Netanyahu government - something his voters understood would never happen
  • A third election - which nobody here has an appetite for.

In the meantime, Mr Netanyahu stays on, but watch this space. For a few weeks.

There was a muted response at Likud's election night headquarters in Tel Aviv.

Hundreds of chairs for party supporters remained empty as activists were kept outside the hall and leaders digested the numbers.

"There is no point starting to work out a coalition based on these numbers as they will change," Likud foreign affairs director Eli Hazan said.

But Blue and White was "cautiously optimistic" that Israel would get new leadership, spokeswoman Melody Sucharewicz told the Times of Israel.

Mr Lieberman prevented Mr Netanyahu from forming a coalition after the previous vote because he refused to back down over a longstanding dispute with religious parties over exempting ultra-Orthodox young men from military service.

However Mr Gantz could have an even more complex job to form a government, because of differences between left-wing parties.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-49740981

2019-09-18 12:13:55Z
52780386271566

Israel election deadlock, Lewandowski's testimony, and a 'Princess Bride' remake? Inconceivable!: The Morning Rundown - NBCNews.com

Good morning, NBC News readers.

The Israeli elections appear too close to call, the Trump administration is considering action against Iran, and Democrats are fuming over former Trump aide Corey Lewandowski stonewalling Congress.

Here's what we're watching today.


Israeli election deadlock leaves Netanyahu's fate uncertain

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared to fall short of a governing majority in Israel's election Wednesday, raising doubts over whether he can maintain his decadelong grip on power.

Partial results suggested Netanyahu's right-wing Likud party and its main rival, the centrist Blue and White party, were expected to win 32 seats each, according to Israel's election committee.

Final results are expected Wednesday and could swing either way — setting up a period of uncertainty in Israeli politics at a time of renewed tension between the United States' Mideast allies and Iran.

The results could also result in dire consequences for Netanyahu, who is facing possible indictments in three corruption cases.

If he remains prime minister Netanyahu may be able to pass legislation that would grant him immunity, but if he loses he may face jail time.


Trump admin weighing retaliatory action against Iran after Saudi oil attack

In a national security meeting on Monday, U.S. military leaders provided President Donald Trump with a menu of possible actions against Iran in response to the attack on Saudi Arabian oil facilities.

The options included a cyberattack or physical strike on Iranian oil facilities or Revolutionary Guard assets, U.S. officials and others briefed on the deliberations told NBC News.

There were no indications that any U.S. military action was imminent, and officials said that no decision has been made.

Trump's call for options comes amid growing confidence by the U.S. intelligence community that Iran was behind Sunday's unprecedented attack on Saudi oil facilities.

But any U.S. military action to retaliate for a strike against Saudi Arabia could face resistance in Congress.

"We don't have a defense treaty with Saudi Arabia," said Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn. "We are under no obligation to defend Saudi Arabia and we have no interest in getting involved in an escalating regional conflict between those two countries."

Sept. 18, 201901:58

'You're not going to stonewall me!': Dems press Lewandowski at fiery hearing

Democrats pressed Corey Lewandowski at a contentious House hearing on Tuesday, with Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., threatening contempt against Trump's former campaign manager for following a White House directive to limit the scope of his testimony.

While the congressional testimony may have felt a bit circus-like at times for House Democrats, NBC News' Jonathan Allen writes in an analysis that Lewandowski put flesh on the bones of special counsel Robert Mueller's report.

Sept. 18, 201901:49

Draining Arizona: Residents say corporate mega-farms are drying up their wells

A battle for water in Arizona is pitting some longtime residents and family farmers against big corporations.

Those who can afford to drill the deepest wells are the ones who get the water, while those who can’t are forced to abandon their property.

“They’ve just taken the water,” one displaced resident said of the big farms, “and when they use up the water, they’ll be gone.”

Sept. 17, 201915:31

Want to receive the Morning Rundown in your inbox? Sign up here.


Plus


THINK about it

Trump finally deserves credit for something: Making the Middle East worse, Brett Bruen, former director of global engagement in the Obama White House, writes in an opinion piece.


Science + Tech = MACH

NBC News reporter Denise Chow planned a day trip to one of Greenland's fast-melting glaciers with scientists who are studying climate change in Greenland.

But then the weather turned, and she got stuck. Here's the story of her unexpected adventure.

The sun sets over Helheim Glacier in Greenland. Not a bad place to spend the night.Denise Chow / NBC News

Live BETTER

Almost every successful person has failed. Here's why it matters. (Video)


One fun thing

A remake of the "The Princess Bride"?

"Inconceivable!"

The rumor, started after Sony Pictures CEO floated the idea in an interview, set the Twitterverse and loyal fans of the 1987 cult classic into pits of despair.

Cary Elwes, who played Westley in Rob Reiner's famously quotable film, succinctly dismissed the notion.

"There’s a shortage of perfect movies in this world," Elwes tweeted. "It would be a pity to damage this one."

Cary Elwes and Robin Wright in The Princess Bride.MGM

Thanks for reading the Morning Rundown.

If you have any comments — likes, dislikes — drop me an email at: petra@nbcuni.com

If you'd like to receive this newsletter in your inbox Monday to Friday, please sign up here.

Thanks, Petra Cahill

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nbcnews.com/news/morning-briefing/israel-election-deadlock-lewandowski-s-testimony-princess-bride-remake-inconceivable-n1055741

2019-09-18 11:57:00Z
CBMiiwFodHRwczovL3d3dy5uYmNuZXdzLmNvbS9uZXdzL21vcm5pbmctYnJpZWZpbmcvaXNyYWVsLWVsZWN0aW9uLWRlYWRsb2NrLWxld2FuZG93c2tpLXMtdGVzdGltb255LXByaW5jZXNzLWJyaWRlLXJlbWFrZS1pbmNvbmNlaXZhYmxlLW4xMDU1NzQx0gEsaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cubmJjbmV3cy5jb20vbmV3cy9hbXAvbmNuYTEwNTU3NDE