Rabu, 19 Juni 2019

Khashoggi murder: Independent investigation blames Saudi Arabia for 'extrajudicial killing' of journalist - CNN

In a much anticipated report, released Wednesday, UN extrajudicial executions investigator Agnes Callamard said that Saudi Arabia was responsible under international law for Khashoggi's "extrajudicial killing."
A prominent writer and Washington Post columnist, Khashoggi died after entering the Saudi consulate in Istanbul in October 2018. While Riyadh initially denied any knowledge of the incident, Saudi officials later claimed that a group of rogue operators, many of whom belong to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's inner circle, were responsible for the journalist's death.
The Saudi attorney general later acknowledged that Khashoggi was killed in a premeditated murder.
The special rapporteur does not make any conclusions on the guilt of the Saudi Crown Prince and King. Instead, Callamard says that there is "credible evidence meriting further investigation by a proper authority" as to whether the "threshold of criminal responsibility has been met."
She goes on to say that Khashoggi was "fully aware of the powers held by the Crown Prince" and had expressed fears about what would happen to him if he returned to the kingdom.
CNN has reached out to the Saudi government for a response to Wednesday's report.
Riyadh has maintained that neither bin Salman nor King Salman knew of the operation to target Khashoggi. US officials, however, have said such a mission -- including 15 men sent from Riyadh -- could not have been carried out without the authorization of bin Salman.
According to the report -- which cites evidence from Turkish and other intelligence agencies -- after entering the consulate, Khashoggi was injected with a sedative and then his head put inside a plastic bag and suffocated.
It quotes an audio recording from inside the consulate, in which Khashoggi is heard being told he will be taken to Saudi Arabia.
"We will have to take you back. There is an order from Interpol," a Saudi man tells the journalist, who replies that "there isn't a case against me" and warns them that people are waiting for him outside the consulate.
The men instruct Khashoggi to write a text message to his son, and argue over what he should say before a voice says "Cut it short."
"There is a towel here. Are you going to give me drugs?" Khashoggi asks.
"We will anesthetize you," a man responds.
A struggle can then be heard, after which a man asks whether Khashoggi has passed out.
"He raises his head."
"Keep pushing."
"Push here; don't remove your hand; push it."
It has previously been reported that after Khashoggi was killed his body was dismembered and removed from the consulate in separate bags. It has not been found.
The special rapporteur found credible evidence pointing to the crime scenes having been "thoroughly, even forensically, cleaned" -- indicating that the Saudi investigation was "not conducted in good faith, and that it may amount to obstructing justice."

Repercussions for Riyadh

Khashoggi's killing and the continued fallout from it has caused a diplomatic crisis for Riyadh, ruining Saudi Arabia's already shaky international reputation and leading many allies to distance themselves from bin Salman.
While US President Donald Trump has shied away from taking a hard line against bin Salman, wishing to retain Riyadh's support in pressuring Iran and flow of money for arms sales, other American politicians have sought to punish the Saudis.
Weeks after the killing, top US officials called for a ceasefire in the Saudi-led but US-supported war in Yemen, and Congress has voted to end US involvement in that conflict entirely -- though Trump vetoed that motion.
Bin Salman's "Davos in the Desert" summit weeks after the Khashoggi killing was a failure after many high profile guests pulled out, and investment in the Kingdom has also suffered since Khashoggi's killing, at a time when the Crown Prince is desperately trying to get foreign backing for his Vision 2030 plan.
Washington has also eased up on Saudi rival Qatar, after initially backing Riyadh's attempts to blockade its fellow Gulf monarchy.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/19/middleeast/khashoggi-saudi-arabia-report-intl/index.html

2019-06-19 10:30:00Z
52780316893549

Hungry polar bear roams around Russian factory - BBC News

A starving and exhausted polar bear has been spotted wandering in Russia's northern city of Norilsk - hundreds of kilometres from its natural habitat.

The female bear was roaming around a factory, under observation by officials in the world's northernmost city.

They say the animal could have simply got lost. Wildlife experts will soon inspect the bear and decide its fate.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-europe-48685015/hungry-polar-bear-roams-around-russian-factory

2019-06-19 04:10:36Z
52780316965432

Selasa, 18 Juni 2019

Angela Merkel shakes during national anthem, blaming dehydration - Guardian News

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mM2yX8NxEvE

2019-06-18 14:11:48Z
CCAiC21NMnlYOE54RXZFmAEB

Trump downplays tanker attacks in contrast to his national security team - CNN

The disconnect between Trump's comments in an interview with Time magazine -- in which he also warned that he would "certainly" go to war with Iran were the country to develop nuclear weapons -- and recent statements by national security adviser John Bolton and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo come at a time of escalating military posturing between the two countries and a heightened risk of confrontation.
Last week, two tankers -- one carrying oil and the other transporting chemicals -- were attacked near the strategically important Strait of Hormuz, a vital shipping route that has been the focal point of regional tensions for decades. Roughly 30% of the world's sea-borne crude oil passes through the strategic choke point, making it a flashpoint for political and economic friction.
The United States has blamed Iran for the attack on the tankers in the Gulf of Oman, releasing video footage that it claims shows an Iranian patrol boat removing an unexploded mine from one of the vessels' hulls. Both Pompeo and Bolton have issued statements blaming Iran for the most recent attack, and Trump himself last week accused Iran of being behind the latest provocation, telling Fox News, "it was them that did it."
Tehran has categorically denied the accusations. In the Time interview, Trump downplayed the incidents.
"So far, it's been very minor," Trump said.
He also downplayed the importance of the Gulf of Oman, suggesting that the US doesn't rely on the region for oil and energy as much as other countries.
"We're not in the position that we used to be in in the Middle East," Trump said.
CNN has reached out to the White House for comment on Trump's remarks.
Recent actions by Washington and Tehran have again raised the possibility of military confrontation in the Persian Gulf. On Monday, acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan said the US will send 1,000 additional US forces and more military resources to the Middle East, hours after Iran said it was ramping up enrichment of low-grade uranium and will pass the limit it is allowed to stockpile under the nuclear deal in 10 days, the latest blow to the nuclear deal agreed between Tehran and world powers in 2015.
And last month, Bolton announced that the Pentagon was deploying the USS Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group and a bomber task force to the region in response to a "number of troubling and escalatory indications and warnings" from Iran.
Asked by Time what moves would lead him to consider going to war with Iran, he said, "I would certainly go over nuclear weapons, and I would keep the other a question mark," referring to the possibility of military action to protect oil supplies.
But when asked if he was considering military action against Iran, the President told Time, "I wouldn't say that. I can't say that at all."
The mixed signals coming from the Trump administration have unnerved allies, House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff said Tuesday.
"The bigger problem is that the administration has been going it alone, escalating pressure on Iran, reneging on the Iran nuclear deal," Schiff, a California Democrat, told CNN's John Berman on "New Day." "And now, when you have Iran engaged in these provocative and belligerent acts attacking shipping, we can't find our allies anywhere. They're worried about this administration rushing to war. They don't have trust in the administration. The administration has ignored their warnings."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/18/politics/donald-trump-iran-tanker/index.html

2019-06-18 13:41:00Z
52780316583109

Trump characterizes alleged attacks by Iran on oil tankers as ‘very minor’ - The Washington Post

President Trump in an interview published Monday night characterized alleged attacks by Iran against two oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman as “very minor” and suggested that the United States might not go to war to protect international oil supplies.

Trump’s assessment in Time magazine reflected a softer posture than that of senior administration officials at the Pentagon and the State Department, as well as some congressional Republicans, as tensions between the United States and Iran have flared recently.

In the interview, Trump said he would “certainly” go to war to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon.

“I would keep the other a question mark,” he said when asked whether he would take military action in response to attacks on oil tankers.

Last week, Trump administration officials blamed Iran for attacks against Norwegian and Japanese oil tankers.

“So far, it’s been very minor,” he told Time, referring to those and other recent attacks the United States has blamed on Iran.

[Iran threatens to surpass uranium limits as tensions with the U.S. continue to grow]

In its effort to convince other nations of Iran’s culpability, the Pentagon released several photographs Monday that it said showed Iran’s involvement in the tanker attacks more clearly than a grainy video released last week.

Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan also announced Monday that he was sending about 1,000 additional troops to the Middle East “for defensive purposes to address air, naval, and ground-based threats.”

“The recent Iranian attacks validate the reliable, credible intelligence we have received on hostile behavior by Iranian forces and their proxy groups that threaten United States personnel and interests across the region,” he said in a statement.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said Sunday that the Trump administration is considering a “full range of options” in response to the oil tanker attacks beyond the crippling sanctions it already has imposed, including on Iran’s oil exports.

“Of course, of course,” Pompeo told CBS’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday when asked if those options include military action.

Trump told Time that the Gulf of Oman is less strategically important for the United States than it used to be.

“Other places get such vast amounts of oil there,” he said. “We get very little. We have made tremendous progress in the last two and a half years in energy. . . . So we’re not in the position that we used to be in the Middle East where . . . some people would say we were there for the oil.”

Meanwhile, Iran said Monday that its stockpile of enriched uranium will surpass limits set by the 2015 international nuclear deal in 10 days unless European partners in the agreement do more to help it circumvent U.S. sanctions.

The announcement, made by the spokesman for Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, was the first time Tehran explicitly said it was on track to violate the agreement. The increase in both quantity and quality of the enriched fuel could shorten the time, estimated at one year, that it would take to produce enough for a nuclear weapon.

Karen DeYoung contributed to this report.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-characterizes-alleged-attacks-by-iran-on-oil-tankers-as-very-minor/2019/06/18/4f2796f4-91c7-11e9-aadb-74e6b2b46f6a_story.html

2019-06-18 13:26:28Z
52780316583109

Hong Kong protests may continue as leaders reject Carrie Lam apology for China extradition bill turmoil today - CBS News

Hong Kong -- The leader of Hong Kong has apologized in person for the first time for the chaos and violence of the past week. Massive demonstrations forced her to hold up a controversial bill that would have paved the way for extraditions from the island to the China.

Protesters fear it could allow people accused of crimes in the semi-autonomous Chinese region to be transferred into the mainland's opaque legal system.

CBS News correspondent Ramy Inocencio reports that Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam, the Beijing-appointed leader of the island, offered her "most sincere apology" and said she was "sad" about the recent mass protests and violence. On Sunday some 2 million people took to the streets in Hong Kong, demanding a complete retraction of the extradition bill.

Inocencio said Lam's apology only brought more questions about her ability to carry on in the role.

The idea of losing face -- being publicly embarrassed -- is a major cultural touchstone in China. The fact that Lam showed her face at all on Tuesday was surprising, said Inocencio, but it appeared to be too little, too late for protesters, who want her to withdrawal the bill and step down.

Hong Kong residents protest increasing Chinese control

Asked by CBS News during her news conference whether her decision not to retract the bill might deepen distrust in her among Hong Kong residents, Lam said she would "not proceed again with this legislative exercise if these fears and anxieties cannot be adequately addressed."

After the news conference, protest organizers said they did not accept her apology, as Lam hasn't met any of their demands.

© 2019 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hong-kong-protest-carrie-lam-apology-china-extradition-bill-turmoil-today-2019-06/

2019-06-18 12:22:00Z
52780315047681

Trump Has Brilliantly Cornered Himself Where He’s Now Demanding Iran Abide by a Deal He Already Reneged On - Slate

President Trump walks out of the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, DC, on June 11, 2019.

We’re still winning, right? Right?

JIM WATSON/Getty Images

The Trump administration announced Monday it is sending an additional 1,000 American troops to the Middle East after it accused Iran of orchestrating attacks on two tankers in the Gulf of Oman last week. The Defense Department said the troops would be deployed for “defensive purposes” and, NPR reports, would be primarily comprised of intelligence, reconnaissance and surveillance (ISR), as well as force protection and engineers. The increase in troop levels is part of a more general, though still modest buildup that began last month after another series of attacks on ships in the region that the U.S. similarly suspects is Iran’s doing.

The U.S., it’s worth noting, is still without a confirmed Secretary of Defense as relations in the region are increasingly strained. “In response to a request from the US Central Command for additional forces, and with the advice of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and in consultation with the White House, I have authorized approximately 1,000 additional troops for defensive purposes to address air, naval, and ground-based threats in the Middle East,” acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan said in a statement. “The recent Iranian attacks validate the reliable, credible intelligence we have received on hostile behavior by Iranian forces and their proxy groups that threaten United States personnel and interests across the region.”

The move comes as Iran has threatened to disregard uranium restrictions outlined in the 2015 nuclear deal that aimed at curbing Tehran’s nuclear ambitions in return for sanctions relief. After years of deriding the nuclear deal as “the worst deal in history,” President Trump withdrew the U.S. from what’s formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and reinstated sanctions on Iran. The Trump administration, already suffering from a serious credibility deficit with allies, is now in the awkward position of demanding that Tehran comply with an agreement the American president has not only derided, but pulled out of! “Administration officials found themselves Monday grappling with whether to press the remaining parties to the deal, including Britain, France and Germany, to demand that Iran stay in compliance,” the Associated Press reports. “They must also consider if such a stance would essentially concede that the restrictions imposed during the Obama administration, while short of ideal, are better than none.”

It’s almost like the previous administration weighed up the pros and cons and made a decision in the best strategic interest of the country. That feeling you have right now is nostalgia for competence.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/06/trump-iran-deal-pulled-out-troops-middle-east-uranium-tehran.html

2019-06-18 12:12:00Z
52780315687635