Kamis, 24 Desember 2020

UK and EU reach post-Brexit trade agreement - CNA

BRUSSELS: Britain and the European Union struck a trade deal on Thursday (Dec 24) after 10 months of intense negotiation allowed them to soften the economic shock of Brexit.

When the UK leaves the EU single market at the New Year it will not now face tariffs on cross-Channel commerce, despite breaking off half a century of close partnership.

"We've taken back control of our laws and our destiny. We've taken back control of every jot and tittle of our regulation in a way that is complete, and unfettered," British Prime Minister Boris Johnson declared.

READ: COVID-19 vaccine could be airlifted to UK if Brexit snarls ports - Minister

EU Commission president Ursula von der Leyen was more measured.

"At the end of a successful negotiations journey I normally feel joy. But today, I only feel quiet satisfaction and, frankly speaking, relief," she said, citing British playwright Shakespeare: "Parting is such sweet sorrow."

But she also showed her steely side, warning that, protected by the deal from unfair British competition, "The single market will be fair and remain so."

And she urged the 440 million Europeans remaining in the 27-nation union to put the drama of the four years since Britain's Brexit referendum behind them and to look to the future.

"I say it is time to leave Brexit behind. Our future is made in Europe," she said.

READ: Deal or no deal, Britain to pay high price for Brexit

Britain formally left the EU in January after a divisive referendum in 2016, the first country to split from the political and economic project that was born as the continent rebuilt in the aftermath of World War II.

But London remains tied to the EU's rules during a transition period that runs until midnight on Dec 31, when the UK will leave the bloc's single market and customs union.

'SOLID FOUNDATIONS'

The final 2,000-page agreement was held up by a last-minute dispute over fishing as both sides haggled over the access EU fishermen will get to Britain's waters after the end of the year.

Von der Leyen said that although the UK would become a "third country" it would be a trusted partner.

READ: UK universities will lose cachet post-Brexit, EU students warn

READ: How will Brexit rules affect the Premier League?

Johnson - who rode to power pledging to "get Brexit done" - insisted it was a "good deal for the whole of Europe and for our friends and partners as well".

"It will not be a bad thing in my view to have a prosperous, dynamic and contented UK on your doorstep," he said from Downing Street.

Leaders around the continent were quick to herald the 11th-hour accord that heads off the threat of Britain crashing out of the EU after 47 years of shared history with no follow-on rules.

Irish premier Micheal Martin - whose EU member state would have been hard hit by a no-deal - said the accord was the "least bad version of Brexit possible".

"There is no such thing as a 'good Brexit' for Ireland. But we have worked hard to minimise the negative consequences," he said.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel said she was "confident" that the deal was a "good outcome" as it now goes over to EU member states to agree.

For French President Emmanuel Macron - often portrayed as a bogeyman by the British tabloids - "Europe's unity and firmness paid off".

EU STATES TO RATIFY

Following the announcement of the political accord, von der Leyen's Commission will send the text to the remaining 27 European member states.

Their ambassadors will meet on Friday, Christmas Day, and are expected to take two or three days to analyse the agreement and decide whether to approve its provisional implementation.

The UK parliament will also have to interrupt its end of year holidays to vote on the deal on Dec 30, and with the opposition backing its implementation is should pass easily.

Assuming the process goes as planned, the negotiating teams will have agreed the mammoth deal in record time.

But with Britain outside the EU single market and customs area, cross-Channel traders will still face a battery of new regulations and delays.

Economists expect both economies, already weakened by the coronavirus epidemic, to take a hit as supply chains are disrupted and costs mount.

Despite this, the threat of a return to tariffs will have been removed, and relations between the former partners will rest on a surer footing.

All sides will look to put a positive spin on the deal to make it look like they did not give too much away.

But it will be seen as win by Johnson, as well as a success for von der Leyen and her chief negotiator Michel Barnier, who led almost 10 months of intense talks with Britain's David Frost.

After the shock 2016 referendum, in which British voters narrowly chose to leave the union, Brexiteers boasted that they could win the "easiest trade deal in history".

But European capitals were concerned that if such a large rival on their doorstep were to deregulate its industry their firms would face unfair competition.

Brussels insisted the only way to keep the land border between Ireland and the UK open was to keep Northern Ireland, a British province, within its customs union.

And members balked at giving up access to Britain's rich fishing waters, which support fleets in France, Belgium, Denmark, Ireland and the Netherlands.

It was the question of fish that emerged as the last stumbling block as late as this week, when member states - led by France - rebuffed UK demands.

London pushed to reduce EU fishing fleets' share of the estimated €650-million annual haul by more than a third, with changes phased in over three years. The EU was insisting on 25 per cent over at least six years.

In the end, the final agreement settled on the EU's figure but cut the length of the transition period during which it would be phased in to five-and-a-half years, an EU official said.

After this time access to Britain's fishing grounds will be negotiated on an annual basis.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiW2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNoYW5uZWxuZXdzYXNpYS5jb20vbmV3cy93b3JsZC91ay1ldS1yZWFjaC1wb3N0LWJyZXhpdC10cmFkZS1hZ3JlZW1lbnQtMTM4Mzg2NjTSAQA?oc=5

2020-12-24 18:11:15Z
52781259169935

‘The deal is done’: Britain seals narrow Brexit accord with EU - South China Morning Post

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. ‘The deal is done’: Britain seals narrow Brexit accord with EU  South China Morning Post
  2. On the cusp of Brexit trade deal, EU and UK hash out final details  CNA
  3. Scotland's papers: UK and EU 'ready to sign deal' and freezing Christmas  BBC News
  4. At long last we have a Brexit deal – and it's as bad as you thought  The Guardian
  5. The Guardian view on a Brexit deal: relief that leaves a bitter taste  The Guardian
  6. View Full coverage on Google News

https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiY2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnNjbXAuY29tL25ld3Mvd29ybGQvZXVyb3BlL2FydGljbGUvMzExNTMxMy9icml0YWluLWFuZC1ldS1zdHJpa2UtcG9zdC1icmV4aXQtdHJhZGUtZGVhbNIBY2h0dHBzOi8vYW1wLnNjbXAuY29tL25ld3Mvd29ybGQvZXVyb3BlL2FydGljbGUvMzExNTMxMy9icml0YWluLWFuZC1ldS1zdHJpa2UtcG9zdC1icmV4aXQtdHJhZGUtZGVhbA?oc=5

2020-12-24 17:19:46Z
52781259169935

Taiwan fines EVA Air US$35000 after pilot blamed for COVID-19 infection - channelnewsasia.com

TAIPEI: Taiwan's Transport Ministry on Thursday (Dec 24) fined EVA Airways Corp NT$1 million (US$35,000) after the government blamed one of its pilots for a rare locally transmitted case of COVID-19 because he failed to follow disease prevention rules.

Taiwan had until this week not reported domestic transmission since Apr 12, thanks to early and effective moves to stop the virus, including mass mask-wearing and strict quarantines for all arrivals.

READ: Airline sacks pilot blamed for Taiwan's first local COVID-19 infection since April

But the government was jolted by Tuesday's announcement of the domestic infection of a woman who is a friend of a New Zealand pilot confirmed to have been infected earlier this week having flown routes to the United States.

EVA Air has sacked the pilot, who has not been named and is being treated in hospital.

The case has ignited public anger after the government said he had not reported all his contacts and the places he had been, nor worn a face mask in the cockpit when he should have.

In a statement referring to the "uproar" caused by the case, the Transport Ministry cited its minister Lin Chia-lung as saying the airline had not fully put in place epidemic prevention measures.

READ: Keep calm, Taiwan says after first local COVID-19 case in 8 months

For breaching rules related to COVID-19, the ministry will fine the airline NT$1 million, the maximum statutory fine it can make, it added.

The ministry will require airlines tighten their epidemic prevention measures for air crew while also issuing its own new rules, it said.

EVA Air, which has already apologised for the incident, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It has not been possible to reach the pilot for comment.

EVA Air, like most airlines, is operating a very reduced schedule due to border restrictions globally.

BOOKMARK THIS: Our comprehensive coverage of the coronavirus outbreak and its developments

Download our app or subscribe to our Telegram channel for the latest updates on the coronavirus outbreak: https://cna.asia/telegram​​​​​​

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiVmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNoYW5uZWxuZXdzYXNpYS5jb20vbmV3cy9hc2lhL3RhaXdhbi1jb3ZpZC0xOS1ldmEtYWlyLWZpbmVkLXBpbG90LTEzODM3Mzgy0gEA?oc=5

2020-12-24 09:58:31Z
52781258927828

South Korea to import J&J, Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines for 16 million people - CNA

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. South Korea to import J&J, Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines for 16 million people  CNA
  2. Ninety-year-old woman first in Switzerland to get COVID-19 shot  Yahoo Singapore News
  3. How Singapore procured the Covid-19 vaccine  The Straits Times
  4. South Korea signs COVID vaccine deals as tougher curbs kick in  Al Jazeera English
  5. COVID-19 mutation 'unlikely' to affect vaccine response: Health expert  CNA
  6. View Full coverage on Google News

https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMicWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNoYW5uZWxuZXdzYXNpYS5jb20vbmV3cy9hc2lhL2NvdmlkLTE5LXNvdXRoLWtvcmVhLXNpZ25zLWRlYWxzLWltcG9ydC1wZml6ZXItamFuc3Nlbi12YWNjaW5lLTEzODM0OTQw0gEA?oc=5

2020-12-24 07:12:39Z
52781264050504

Rabu, 23 Desember 2020

Defying Congress, Trump vetoes defense bill, threatens government shutdown - CNA

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump vetoed a bipartisan defence policy Bill on Wednesday (Dec 24) and raised the prospect that the United States could face a government shutdown during a pandemic, stirring new turmoil in Washington as he headed to Florida for Christmas.

Angry at his fellow Republicans in Congress, Trump sought to refashion two complex pieces of legislation that passed Congress by wide, bipartisan margins after months of negotiation.

Trump followed through on a threat to veto the defence Bill and demanded dramatic changes to a US$2.3 trillion package that funds the federal government and provides nearly US$900 billion in coronavirus aid.

If Trump blocks the spending package, large parts of the US government could start to shut down next week for lack of funds at a time when officials are distributing two coronavirus vaccines and working to respond to a massive hacking attack.

READ: COVID-19 relief deal in Congress slips to Sunday as new funding deadline looms

READ: Trump's COVID bill delay leaves millions of desperate Americans in limbo

With less than a month left in office, Trump is angry that some Republicans have acknowledged his loss to Democrat Joe Biden in the Nov 3 election. Biden will be sworn in as president on Jan 20.

Trump said he vetoed the defence policy Bill, which has passed every year since 1961, because he objected to liability protections for social media companies unrelated to national security and did not want to rename military bases that are currently named for generals who fought for the pro-slavery Confederacy during the Civil War.

Democrats and Republicans objected to Trump's veto of the National Defense Authorization Act.

"I look forward to overriding the president’s fruitless and ridiculous attempt to undermine our national security," Democratic Senator Mark Warner said in a statement.

Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Jim Inhofe, a Republican, also blasted Trump's veto.

"The NDAA has become law every year for 59 years straight because it’s absolutely vital to our national security and our troops," Inhofe said. "This year must not be an exception."

US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on Wednesday the House would return on Dec 28 to vote on whether to override Trump's veto. That is the same day government funding is due to expire. A Senate vote is expected shortly thereafter.

TRUMP SURPRISED ALLIES

In a video posted to social media on Tuesday evening, Trump surprised some of his closest officials by demanding lawmakers change the coronavirus aid part of the spending Bill to include US$2,000 payments to each American, more than triple the US$600 per person provided.

A source familiar with the situation said aides thought they had talked Trump out of the US$2,000 demand last week. The video surprised even Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, who took part in the talks and backed the US$600 figure.

Members of Congress had been discussing the US$600 figure for almost a week before voting to approve it late on Monday night.

Trump did not explicitly say he would veto the Bill, apparently holding out hope Congress would modify a package that took months to negotiate. The White House had said on Sunday that Trump would sign it into law.

Trump has 10 days, not counting Sundays, to veto the Bill once he receives it from Congress, which is still processing the massive legislation.

If he vetoes it, Congress can promptly vote to override him. If Trump takes no action within 10 days of receipt, excluding Sundays, it would automatically become law unless Congress is adjourned. If no action occurs by Jan 3 when the new Congress is sworn in, the Bill would die.

READ: New York City enforces quarantine for UK travellers, rolls out COVID-19 vaccine to paramedics

READ: Pfizer to supply US with additional 100 million COVID-19 vaccine doses

Trump sparked a record 35-day government shutdown two years ago when he rejected a federal spending Bill over what he said was insufficient funding for building a US-Mexico border wall.

Trump also demanded the Bill be stripped of foreign aid, which is included in every annual federal spending Bill - and was requested by his own administration last year. He objected to other government activities funded by the 5,500-page Bill, such as fish breeding and funding for the Smithsonian museums.

Some congressional Democrats - who had viewed the relief package as too small a response to a crisis that has killed more than 320,000 Americans and thrown millions of people out of work - welcomed Trump's call for larger payments.

Pelosi said the House could vote to raise the payments on Thursday if House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy agreed.

McCarthy aides did not respond to a request for comment.

The disagreement over the amount of stimulus payments have put Republicans in an awkward position. Many of them opposed US$2,000 as too expensive, and they would have to either defy their party's leader or change their position on those payments.

"Let's get this into law, and we can have an ongoing discussion about whether there should be additional direct payments or not," Republican Senator Pat Toomey said on Fox News.

In Georgia, where control of the US Senate hangs on a pair of Jan 5 runoff elections, Democrats pressed incumbent Republican Senators David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler to say whether they agreed with Trump that the US$600 payments were too low. Neither campaign responded to a request for comment.

BOOKMARK THIS: Our comprehensive coverage of the coronavirus outbreak and its developments

Download our app or subscribe to our Telegram channel for the latest updates on the coronavirus outbreak: https://cna.asia/telegram​​​​​​

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMic2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNoYW5uZWxuZXdzYXNpYS5jb20vbmV3cy93b3JsZC9kZWZ5aW5nLWNvbmdyZXNzLXRydW1wLXZldG9lcy1kZWZlbnNlLWJpbGwtdGhyZWF0ZW5zLWdvdmVybm1lbnQtMTM4MzI5MTTSAQA?oc=5

2020-12-23 23:15:00Z
52781261915580

Trump vetoes sweeping US defence Bill - CNA

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump vetoed a broad defence funding Bill sent to him by Congress on Wednesday (Dec 23), complaining that it helps Russia and China and objecting to provisions to rename military bases.

The bipartisan Bill was passed by high enough margins in both chambers of Congress for lawmakers to - in theory - override the president's rejection.

The veto of the US$740 billion measure to fund the military for fiscal 2021 came a day after the US leader, with less than one month left in office, threw a separate US$900 billion COVID-19 relief Bill and overall funding for the government into question.

Trump criticised the annual National Defense Authorization Act for not responding to his demand to end liability protections for social media companies, known as Section 230 - an issue with no relationship to the US Defense Department.

He also objected to a provision in the NDAA to rename military bases bearing the names of generals from the secessionist, slavery-supporting South in the 19th century US civil war.

And he objected to a provision which could impede his decision to sharply cut US troop levels in Germany, Afghanistan and elsewhere.

The NDAA "fails to include critical national security measures, includes provisions that fail to respect our veterans and our military's history, and contradicts efforts by my Administration to put America first in our national security and foreign policy actions," Trump said in a statement.

Without the changes to Section 230, Trump said, the NDAA "is a 'gift' to China and Russia."

'RECKLESSNESS'

The Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi slammed Trump's veto as "an act of recklessness that harms our troops, endangers our security & undermines the will of Congress".

Both the House and the Senate set aside time next week to vote to override the veto - which would be the first such rebuff from Congress in his nearly four years in office.

But with the omnibus funding Bill, including general government finance and COVID-19 relief, still up in the air, it was not clear whether Trump was leveraging both for concessions.

"I will not approve this Bill, which would put the interests of the Washington, DC establishment over those of the American people," Trump said.

Trump has repeatedly demanded that the NDAA include changes to Section 230, a part of US communications legislation that protects social media giants like Facebook and Twitter from responsibility for content posted by their users.

Since early this year Trump has become angered by social media for censoring or raising questions about the factuality of his own posts, especially about the coronavirus pandemic.

But Trump said changing Section 230 was an issue of national security.

"Your failure to terminate the very dangerous national security risk of Section 230 will make our intelligence virtually impossible to conduct without everyone knowing what we are doing at every step," he said in the statement.

He called the move to change base names - which is supported generally in the Pentagon - "politically motivated", making no mention of the legacy of racism and slavery carried by the names.

The veto does not immediately choke off funds to the Pentagon but if the NDAA isn't passed soon, funding could be tightened.

"The NDAA has become law every year for 59 years straight because it's absolutely vital to our national security and our troops," said Republican Senator Jim Inhofe.

"This year must not be an exception. Our men and women who volunteer to wear the uniform shouldn't be denied what they need - ever."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiWWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNoYW5uZWxuZXdzYXNpYS5jb20vbmV3cy93b3JsZC90cnVtcC12ZXRvZXMtc3dlZXBpbmctdXMtZGVmZW5jZS1iaWxsLTEzODM0MDU00gEA?oc=5

2020-12-23 22:01:01Z
52781261915580

Another new variant of COVID-19 virus found in the UK: Health minister - CNA

LONDON: A new, potentially more infectious variant of the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19 has been found in Britain in cases linked to South Africa, British Health Secretary Matt Hancock said on Wednesday (Dec 23).

South Africa's health department said last week that a new genetic mutation of the virus had been discovered and might be responsible for a recent surge in infections there.

"Thanks to the impressive genomic capability of the South Africans, we've detected two cases of another new variant of coronavirus here in the UK," Hancock told a media briefing.

"Both are contacts of cases who have travelled from South Africa over the past few weeks."

READ: What we know about the new strain of coronavirus found in Britain

Britain is already trying to curb the spread of a mutated strain of the virus which is up to 70 per cent more transmissible, and further studies aerie being carried out on the new variant.

"This new variant is highly concerning, because it is yet more transmissible, and it appears to have mutated further than the new variant has been discovered in the UK," he said.

Close contacts of those with the new variant and all those who have been in South Africa in the last fortnight, or were in close contact with someone who had, must quarantine, he said.

Immediate restrictions were being imposed on travel from South Africa, he added.

Countries around the world have in recent days closed their borders to both Britain and South Africa following the identification of the new, fast-spreading variants of the coronavirus.

"So the new variant in the UK, which we've identified, is very different to the variant in South Africa, it's got different mutations," said Susan Hopkins from Public Health England.

"Both of them look like they're more transmissible. We have more evidence on the transmission for the UK variant because we've been studying that with great detail with academic partners. We're still learning about the South African variant."

She expressed confidence that the spread of the South Africa-linked variant would be controlled and said vaccines that have already been developed should be effective.

"We have no evidence at the moment that the vaccine will not work, so actually what that means in fact is that there's strong evidence that it will work, because the vaccine produces a strong immune response and it's broad and acts against lots of variation in the virus," she said. 

BOOKMARK THIS: Our comprehensive coverage of the coronavirus outbreak and its developments

Download our app or subscribe to our Telegram channel for the latest updates on the coronavirus outbreak: https://cna.asia/telegram

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiaGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNoYW5uZWxuZXdzYXNpYS5jb20vbmV3cy93b3JsZC9hbm90aGVyLW5ldy1jb3ZpZC0xOS1jb3JvbmF2aXJ1cy12YXJpYW50LWRldGVjdGVkLXVrLTEzODMyMTE40gEA?oc=5

2020-12-23 16:18:45Z
52781258663103